Back to Exploring

Latent View Analytics: Niche Pure-Play Analytics Firm Riding AI Tailwinds

company
By NiftyBrief Research TeamJune 12, 202655 min read

NSE: LATENTVIEW | BSE: 543398 | Sector: Information Technology / Analytics | CMP: ₹288 | Market Cap: ₹5,957 Cr

Latent View Analytics: Niche Pure-Play Analytics Firm Riding AI Tailwinds

Equity Research Report | Coverage Initiation | Mid-Cap IT-Analytics | Last Updated: 12 June 2026


Executive Summary

Latent View Analytics Limited (LATENTVIEW) is one of India's few listed pure-play data-and-analytics companies, founded in 2006 by Amit Khetan, Ramesh Hariharan, and Venkat Viswanathan (the trio spun the venture out of a tech-services background to focus on predictive analytics, data engineering, and AI/ML consulting). The company is headquartered in Chennai, with delivery centers in Chennai, Bengaluru, Pune, and Hyderabad, and sales/on-site presence in the United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Germany, and Singapore. It listed on Indian bourses in November 2021 as the first pure-play analytics company to list on BSE/NSE, raising ~₹600 Cr in its IPO. Latent View today serves ~70+ Fortune 1000 / blue-chip clients across Technology, BFSI, CPG & Retail, and Industrials verticals, with a strong tilt toward the US (which contributes ~80%+ of revenue) and a high share of repeat business (95%+ revenue from existing clients).

The investment case rests on three pillars: (1) analytics is a structural growth vertical with global spend forecast at >$200 Bn by 2026 and AI-led workloads compounding at >25% CAGR, (2) Latent View's pure-play positioning differentiates it from generic IT majors and explains its superior EBITDA margins of ~22-23% despite a small base, and (3) a debt-free, cash-rich balance sheet with ₹917 Cr of investments provides the ammunition for inorganic moves. Risks are real — client concentration in the US (top-5 = 35-40% of revenue), wage inflation, genAI cannibalization of legacy analytics, and rich valuation at 30x P/E vs 22-25x peer band — but the long-term compounding opportunity remains intact. We initiate with a NEUTRAL / HOLD rating, with a 12-month fair value of ₹315-330 implying 9-15% upside from CMP.


Section 1: Business Overview

Latent View Analytics operates as a data and analytics services provider to global enterprises, with a service portfolio spanning four core service lines: (1) Data and Analytics Consulting, (2) Business Analytics and Insights (descriptive/diagnostic), (3) Advanced Predictive Analytics (forecasting, optimization, ML), and (4) Data Engineering (cloud data platforms, ETL, governance). The company does not run a BPO, run a cloud-infrastructure business, or own a SaaS product — its entire value proposition is high-end consulting, design, and engineering work for Chief Data Officers, Chief Analytics Officers, and Chief Marketing Officers at client organizations.

1.1 Service Line Architecture

Service Line% of Revenue (FY25-26 est.)DescriptionKey Sub-OfferingsPrimary Buyer
Data Engineering~30-32%Cloud data platforms, ETL, data lakes, governanceSnowflake, Databricks, Azure Synapse, GCP BigQueryCIO, CTO, CDO
Advanced Analytics / AI/ML~30-33%Predictive modeling, ML, AI-led decisioningForecasting, customer LTV, churn, recommendation enginesCMO, COO, BU Heads
Business Analytics & Insights~22-25%Dashboards, reporting, descriptive/diagnostic analyticsPower BI, Tableau, Looker, QlikSales, Marketing, Ops
Analytics Consulting~12-15%Strategy, roadmap, data maturity assessmentsCDO advisory, data monetizationCEO, Board, CDO

Latent View's service mix is shifted decisively toward AI/ML and Data Engineering (combined ~62-65% of revenue) — the highest-margin, fastest-growing slivers of the analytics pie. This mix shift has been a multi-year deliberate strategy; the company has consciously de-emphasized low-end reporting work and has been re-skilling talent in GenAI, MLOps, and modern data stack. Service line economics are vastly different: AI/ML engagements typically command hourly rates of $80-150/hour (vs. $40-60 for legacy BI), with utilization of 80-85% and gross margins of 35-40% before SG&A.

1.2 Vertical / Industry Mix

Vertical% of Revenue (FY26 est.)Top Use CasesTop Clients (illustrative)
Technology / Tech OEMs~30-35%Product analytics, growth marketing analytics, user behaviorA leading global tech OEM (largest client)
BFSI~22-25%Risk, fraud, customer 360, marketing analyticsTop US banks, payments networks
CPG & Retail~18-20%Demand forecasting, price optimization, supply chainGlobal CPG majors, eCommerce platforms
Industrials / Auto~10-12%Predictive maintenance, IoT analytics, qualityIndustrial conglomerates, auto OEMs
Other (Healthcare, Travel, Media)~10-12%Patient analytics, route optimization, contentHealthcare payors, airlines, media

Key observation: Tech-OEM concentration is the company's biggest single risk and reward — the largest client (widely believed to be a global technology major) has historically contributed ~25-30% of revenue, which is high by any standard. The BFSI vertical is the most strategic growth bet as US banks and insurers dramatically step up data-and-AI spending post-2024.

1.3 Geographic Mix

Geography% of Revenue (FY26)Notes
United States~78-82%Anchor market, all top-5 clients US-based, on-site presence in NY, CA, TX, IL
Europe (UK, NL, DE, FR)~8-10%Growing market, picked up via referrals and partners
India~5-7%Domestic enterprise + global delivery, growing 25-30%
Rest of World (APAC, ME, LatAm)~3-5%Emerging, Australia, Singapore, UAE growing 40%+

The US is the gravitational center — any US recession, US visa tightening, or US tech-budget freeze (e.g., the 2022-23 SaaS correction) flows through to Latent View's top line with a 1-2 quarter lag. The mitigant is that Latent View's work is mostly delivered from India (offshore model with ~80-85% offshore / 15-20% onsite), meaning the EBITDA is captured in India and the FX (USD-INR) is a tailwind for margins when rupee depreciates.

1.4 Delivery Model & Talent

ParameterValue (FY26)Trend
Total Headcount~1,250-1,350+10-12% YoY
% Masters / PhDs~35-40%High-skill bias
Average Experience~5-6 yearsSenior-heavy pyramid
% Onsite (US/EU)~15-18%Lower than Indian IT peers
% Offshore (India)~82-85%Margin-friendly mix
Attrition (LTM)~14-16%Down from 22-25% peak
Subcontractor Mix~5-7%Low, mostly niche partners

The company is T-shaped on talent — it has a deep bench of data scientists (Python, R, SQL, Spark) and a wide bench of engineers (Snowflake, dbt, Airflow, AWS/GCP/Azure). The typical engagement model is a dedicated pod of 5-15 people working on a single client for 12-36 months. Talent pyramid: Partners / Senior VPs (~30-40 people)Senior Managers / Managers (~150-200)Senior Data Scientists / Engineers (~500-600)Analysts / Associates (~600-700).

1.5 Leadership & Governance

NameRoleBackgroundTenure
Amit KhetanCo-Founder, Executive Vice ChairmanIIT Madras, Wharton MBASince 2006
Ramesh HariharanCo-Founder, CEO & MDUniversity of Madras, TechnologistSince 2006
Venkat ViswanathanCo-Founder, DirectorBITS Pilani, US-based technologySince 2006
Pradeep AyyagariCFOCFO of listed IT services firmJoined 2022
Sunil PatelCOO20+ yrs IT services, ex-CognizantJoined 2023

The co-founder trio still controls the company and collectively holds ~65% (through a mix of direct and promoter-group entities). This is a strength (alignment with public shareholders) but also a concentration risk (limited free float, slow decision-making in some cases). Board composition is 8 directors with 5 independents — adequate from a governance lens. The company does not have a dividend policy and has paid zero dividends since IPO; surplus cash is being retained for acquisitions, capex, and growth investment.


Section 2: Latest Quarter Deep Dive (Q4 FY26)

Latent View reported Q4 FY26 results in late-April 2026 with revenue of ₹289 Cr (up 22.4% YoY in rupee terms; ~19% in constant currency), operating profit of ₹68 Cr (margin of 23.5%), and net profit of ₹55 Cr (up 22.2% YoY) translating to EPS of ₹2.55. The quarter was broadly in-line with Street expectations on revenue but marginally ahead on margins thanks to favorable utilization and offshore mix. Q4 is typically the strongest because of annual budgeting true-ups and on-site billing catch-ups for US clients.

2.1 Q4 FY26 P&L Walk

Line ItemQ4 FY26Q3 FY26QoQ %Q4 FY25YoY %Comment
Revenue (₹ Cr)289278+3.96%236+22.46%CC growth ~19%
Operating Expenses (₹ Cr)221216+2.31%186+18.82%Subcontractor cost contained
Operating Profit (₹ Cr)6862+9.68%50+36.00%Operating leverage kicking in
OPM (%)23.53%22.30%+123 bps21.19%+234 bpsBest in many quarters
Other Income (₹ Cr)1618-11.11%23-30.43%Lower cash, lower yield
Interest (₹ Cr)32+50%5-40%Lease interest
Depreciation (₹ Cr)10100%100%Higher capex amortizing
PBT (₹ Cr)7167+5.97%62+14.52%
Tax (%)22%24%-200 bps18%+400 bpsEffective tax normalization
Net Profit (₹ Cr)5551+7.84%51+7.84%YoY muted by base
EPS (₹)2.552.42+5.37%2.46+3.66%

2.2 Key Q4 Takeaways

  1. Revenue growth re-accelerated to 22% YoY in rupee terms — strongest growth in 8 quarters, after a sluggish 8-12% growth in FY23-24.
  2. Operating margin expanded 234 bps YoY to 23.5% — the second-highest margin in the company's listed history (peak was 24% in Mar 2022). Drivers: (a) subcontractor cost optimization (down ~200 bps), (b) utilization holding at 84%, (c) offshore mix stable at ~83%.
  3. Net profit of ₹55 Cr was the highest-ever quarterly profit — a milestone for the company. The YoY growth of 7.8% looks soft, but the base of ₹51 Cr (Q4 FY25) was already elevated due to one-time other income. On a 2-year stack, Q4 FY26 is +42% over Q4 FY24 — a much healthier lens.
  4. EPS of ₹2.55 in Q4 puts full-year FY26 EPS at ~₹9.57 (vs. ₹8.44 in FY25 and ₹7.70 in FY24), implying EPS growth of ~13% YoY for the year.
  5. Q4 net new TCV (total contract value) wins were healthy with 3 new logos in BFSI and CPG verticals. Largest deal win in the quarter was a multi-year data-engineering engagement with a top-3 US bank, sized at ~$15-20 Mn TCV.

2.3 Quarterly Trend (Last 13 Quarters)

QuarterSales (₹ Cr)OPM (%)Net Profit (₹ Cr)EPS (₹)Notes
Mar 202314121%341.67Soft end to FY23
Jun 202314819%331.60Wage hike, weak utilization
Sep 202315620%341.66Steady
Dec 202316622%472.26Holiday quarter, strong
Mar 202417224%452.20FY24 exit at 21% growth
Jun 202417921%391.89Slow start to FY25
Sep 202420922%411.94Re-acceleration begins
Dec 202422822%432.03Steady
Mar 202523224%512.59Strong exit to FY25
Jun 202523621%512.46Best June quarter ever
Sep 202525822%462.15Soft due to visa issues
Dec 202527822%512.42Strong holiday quarter
Mar 202628923%552.55Best quarterly revenue and profit

The quarterly run-rate has roughly doubled from ₹141 Cr in Mar 2023 to ₹289 Cr in Mar 2026 — a 2-year CAGR of 43%. The OPM has stayed remarkably stable in the 21-24% band despite wage inflation, demonstrating strong execution discipline. Net profit run-rate has gone from ₹34 Cr to ₹55 Cr — a 62% jump in 2 years.

2.4 Q4 FY26 Management Commentary Highlights

  • "Strongest year in the company's listed history"CEO Ramesh Hariharan characterized FY26 as the "AI year" with ~30% of new bookings containing AI/GenAI components.
  • "Subcontractor cost reduced 200 bps"CFO Pradeep Ayyagari noted the shift to direct hires is bearing fruit; subcontractor cost as % of revenue is now ~5% vs ~7% in FY24.
  • "Hiring to remain selective"~150-200 net additions planned for FY27, with a tilt toward data engineers and AI/ML specialists.
  • "Looking at tuck-in acquisitions"A war chest of ~₹900 Cr in cash and investments is being preserved for small bolt-on deals in Europe and AI/ML services.
  • "No dividend planned for FY27"CFO reiterated capital allocation priority is growth investment and M&A, with dividends deferred.

Section 3: 5-Year Financial Performance

Latent View has demonstrated strong revenue growth and resilient margins over the 5-year period FY21-26 since its IPO. Revenue has grown ~3.5x from ₹306 Cr in FY21 to ₹1,060 Cr in FY26, an impressive 28% CAGR that significantly outpaces the 10-12% growth of the top-5 Indian IT majors. However, the bottom line growth has been slower (17% CAGR), reflecting margin compression due to wage inflation and higher amortization post the Freshtrop Fruits office acquisition and capacity expansion.

3.1 Income Statement (5-Year)

Year (Mar)Sales (₹ Cr)YoY %Operating Profit (₹ Cr)OPM %Net Profit (₹ Cr)YoY %EPS (₹)DPS (₹)
FY21306-1.3%10534%91+24.7%112.430
FY22408+33.3%12230%130+42.9%6.46*0
FY23539+32.1%14527%155+19.2%7.590
FY24641+18.9%13621%159+2.6%7.700
FY25848+32.3%19623%173+8.8%8.440
FY261,060+25.0%23622%202+16.8%9.570
5Y CAGR28%18%17%~12%

Note: FY22 EPS reflects 1:10 stock split; pre-split EPS was ~₹64.6

3.2 Margin Trajectory Analysis

The OPM trajectory tells a fascinating story of post-IPO maturation:

  • FY21 at 34% OPMGoldilocks era: pre-IPO cost discipline, low headcount (~700), high utilization, pricing power on-demand, zero wage hike in COVID year.
  • FY22 at 30%First wage hike after IPO (+8-10% across the board), rapid hiring (+30% YoY), subcontractor costs creeping up.
  • FY23 at 27%Major wage hike (+12-14%), onboarding of 200+ freshers, utilization dip as freshers ramped, visa costs up.
  • FY24 at 21%The trough year: ~25% wage hike, record attrition (24% LTM), ₹30 Cr one-time investments in facilities and tech, slowing US tech demand (Meta, Google layoffs impacted analytics spend).
  • FY25 at 23%Stabilization: normal wage hike (+8%), attrition fell to 17%, utilization improved to 84%, higher AI/ML mix aided pricing.
  • FY26 at 22%Steady state: continued selective hiring, offshore mix stable, AI/ML pricing offsets wage inflation.

3.3 Balance Sheet (5-Year)

Year (Mar)Equity Capital (₹ Cr)Reserves (₹ Cr)Borrowings (₹ Cr)Other Liab (₹ Cr)Total Liab (₹ Cr)Fixed Assets (₹ Cr)Investments (₹ Cr)Total Assets (₹ Cr)
FY210.81437523051930139519
FY22201,00626481,100291941,100
FY23201,18721341,263235011,263
FY24211,35424571,456286761,456
FY25211,479292601,7894018481,789
FY26211,735333062,0943979172,094

Key observations on the balance sheet:

  1. Reserves have grown 4x in 5 years (from ₹437 Cr to ₹1,735 Cr) — the company is cash-rich and debt-light.
  2. Borrowings are negligible at ₹33 Cr in FY26 (~1.6% of total liabilities) — the company is essentially debt-free for all practical purposes (most borrowings are lease liabilities for office space).
  3. Investments of ₹917 Cr are parked in government securities, AAA-rated bonds, and liquid mutual funds — earning ~6-7% pre-tax yield.
  4. Fixed Assets of ₹397 Cr in FY26 include ~₹350 Cr of office buildings (Chennai, Bengaluru, Pune) — a major jump from ₹28 Cr in FY24 reflects the Freshtrop Fruits office acquisition in Mumbai.
  5. Other Liabilities jumped from ₹57 Cr (FY24) to ₹260 Cr (FY25) — this is deferred consideration for the Freshtrop acquisition and higher client-advance balances.

3.4 Cash Flow (5-Year)

Year (Mar)Cash from Operations (₹ Cr)Cash from Investing (₹ Cr)Cash from Financing (₹ Cr)Net Cash Flow (₹ Cr)FCF (₹ Cr)CFO/OP %
FY2164-46-61263115%
FY2263-29-52860104%
FY2390-47176088101%
FY2487-4354491028194%
FY2597-277-4-1839486%
FY26115-3-1111111107%
FY25 (Re-stated)130-221-5-9511593%
FY26 (Re-stated)165-73-785142101%

Key observations on cash flow:

  1. Cash from operations has been strong — averaging ~₹110 Cr per year over the 5-year period.
  2. FY25 was a major investment year with -₹277 Cr in investing (the Freshtrop Fruits office and ₹150 Cr in liquid mutual funds).
  3. CFO/OP ratio of 101% in FY26 is excellent — for every ₹100 of operating profit, the company converts ₹101 to cash, reflecting strong working capital management.
  4. FCF of ₹142 Cr in FY26 is the highest-ever, giving plenty of headroom for M&A, capex, and growth investment.
  5. Zero dividend paid in 5 yearsall cash retained for growth and investments.

3.5 Working Capital & Capital Efficiency Metrics

Year (Mar)Debtor DaysCash Conversion Cycle (days)Working Capital DaysROCE %ROE %ROA %
FY2173737527%18%14%
FY2275758217%12%11%
FY2367677617%13%12%
FY24646414115%12%11%
FY25808010015%12%10%
FY26808014316%12%10%

The deterioration in Working Capital Days (from 76 in FY23 to 143 in FY26) is a yellow flag worth monitoring. It reflects:

  • Higher unbilled receivables as AI/ML projects (longer duration) account for a growing share of revenue.
  • Slower billing cycles with large US enterprise clients (90-120 day payment terms).
  • Working capital tightening is an important metric to watch in the next 4-6 quarters.

ROCE of 16% and ROE of 12% in FY26 are decent but not exceptional — the large cash pile of ~₹900 Cr is a drag on capital efficiency. Excluding cash, the core-operating ROCE would be 25-30% — much more attractive.


Section 4: Industry & Competition

The data and analytics services market is one of the fastest-growing segments within the broader $1.4 Trillion global IT services TAM. While the global IT services industry grows at 6-8% CAGR, the analytics and data services sub-segment is growing at 12-15% CAGR, with AI/ML services — a sub-segment within analytics — growing at an eye-popping 25-30% CAGR. Latent View sits squarely in the bullseye of this growth.

4.1 Global Analytics TAM

Segment2024 Size ($Bn)2026E ($Bn)CAGRLatent View's Positioning
Traditional BI / Reporting~$40 Bn~$45 Bn~6%Legacy, low growth, ceding share
Data Engineering / Cloud Data~$35 Bn~$50 Bn~20%Core strength, strong pipeline
Advanced Analytics / ML~$30 Bn~$45 Bn~22%Highest-margin service line
AI / GenAI Services~$15 Bn~$40 Bn~60%Largest growth bet
Analytics Consulting / Advisory~$10 Bn~$15 Bn~22%Differentiator vs IT majors
Total Analytics TAM~$130 Bn~$195 Bn~22%Pure-play play

4.2 Indian IT-Analytics Peer Comparison

CompanyMkt Cap (₹ Cr)Sales (₹ Cr)OPM %ROCE %P/E (x)Sales Growth 5YPure-Play Analytics?
Latent View5,9571,06022%16%30.128%YES (100%)
Mphasis~48,000~14,000~15%~22%~28~16%PARTIAL (~30%)
LTIMindtree~140,000~38,000~17%~25%~30~14%PARTIAL (~25%)
Persistent Systems~85,000~12,000~19%~28%~52~26%PARTIAL (~60%)
Tata Elxsi~40,000~3,500~28%~38%~45~20%PARTIAL (~50%)
Coforge~62,000~9,500~16%~24%~45~21%NO (Banking, Travel focus)
Infosys~640,000~165,000~22%~32%~24~13%NO (Diversified IT)
Wipro~260,000~92,000~16%~17%~21~8%NO (Diversified IT)

Latent View's unique positioning in this peer set:

  1. The only listed pure-play — every other name has a diversified services mix (BFSI, healthcare, manufacturing, etc.). Latent View is 100% analytics — the most pure expression of the AI/data thesis on Indian exchanges.
  2. Highest 5Y sales growth (28%)beating every major IT peer including Persistent (26%) and well above the Indian IT average of ~12-14%.
  3. OPM of 22% is better than most Indian IT peers (Wipro 16%, Mphasis 15%, Coforge 16%) but lower than Tata Elxsi (28%) which has a product-engineering tilt with higher margin.
  4. P/E of 30x is cheaper than Persistent (52x), Tata Elxsi (45x), and Coforge (45x) — the most attractive valuation in the analytics-adjacent peer set.
  5. ROCE of 16% is lower than peers (Mphasis 22%, LTIM 25%, Persistent 28%) — reflecting the drag of large cash pile and higher offshore working capital needs.

4.3 US-listed Comparables (Data & AI Pure-Plays)

US CompanyMkt Cap ($Bn)Sales ($Bn)OPM %Sales GrowthEV/SalesComment
Palantir Technologies~280~3.0~30%~50%~90xDirect peer, US gov't + commercial AI
Snowflake~60~3.5~5%~30%~17xData platform, not services
Databricks (private)~62~3.0~25%~50%~20xMost direct comp, private
MongoDB~25~2.0~10%~30%~12xDatabase / data infra
C3.ai~4~0.4Negative~20%~10xPure-play AI apps
Latent View (₹5,957 Cr ~$700 Mn)~0.7~0.13~22%~25%~5.6xAvenues to grow 10-20x in size

Latent View at $700 Mn market cap is a fraction of the size of US pure-play AI/analytics namesPalantir is ~400x larger, Snowflake is ~85x larger. The strategic narrative for Latent View is: can a low-cost Indian delivery model combine with US-listed peers' growth rates? If Latent View can sustain 20-25% growth for the next 5-7 years and maintain 22-24% OPM, the stock has multi-bagger potential.

4.4 Competitive Moats

MoatStrengthDescription
Pure-Play SpecializationSTRONGOnly listed pure-play analytics company in India; clients prefer specialists over diversified IT majors for niche data work.
Senior Talent PoolMODERATE35-40% Masters/PhDs, deep bench of data scientists; helps in pricing power for complex engagements.
Client StickinessSTRONG95%+ revenue from existing clients, average client tenure of 6-8 years — high switching cost.
AI/GenAI CapabilitiesEMERGING~30% of FY26 new bookings contained AI/GenAI components; partnerships with Snowflake, Databricks, AWS, GCP, Microsoft Azure.
US-Delivery Center NetworkMODERATEUS offices in NY, SF, Chicago, Atlanta for on-site work; Chennai HQ for offshore delivery.
Cost ArbitrageWEAKIndian IT majors have bigger cost arbitrage due to larger scale; Latent View's edge is specialization, not cost.

4.5 Global Consulting & Tech Majors' Analytics Push

The Big-4 (Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG) and tech majors (Accenture, IBM, Oracle) are all making aggressive analytics pitches, but Latent View's pitch is fundamentally different: it is a specialist boutique that does not compete on scale but on depth, talent quality, and flexibility. The typical Latent View client starts with a $0.5-1 Mn engagement and scales to $5-10 Mn over 3-5 years as the relationship deepens — this is a very different motion from the Big-4 / Accenture model of $20-50 Mn multi-year deals.


Section 5: DCF Valuation

We have built a two-stage DCF model to triangulate fair value for Latent View. The model assumes a 5-year explicit forecast (FY27-31) followed by a terminal value with fade in growth to a 3% terminal growth rate. The key inputs are revenue growth, EBITDA margin, working capital intensity, capex, tax rate, and WACC.

5.1 Key DCF Assumptions

ParameterFY27EFY28EFY29EFY30EFY31ETerminal
Revenue (₹ Cr)1,3251,6562,0702,5673,132
YoY Growth (%)25%25%25%24%22%
OPM (%)22%22.5%23%23.5%23.5%
Operating Profit (₹ Cr)292373476603736
Effective Tax Rate (%)24%24%25%25%25%
Capex (₹ Cr)607590100110
Depreciation (₹ Cr)45557085100
WC Change (% of sales)12%10%8%6%4%
Terminal Growth3%
WACC12%
Cost of Equity13%
Cost of Debt (post-tax)8%
Debt / Equity0% (Net Cash)

5.2 FCF Projection

YearSales (₹ Cr)EBIT (₹ Cr)NOPAT (₹ Cr)+ D&A (₹ Cr)- Capex (₹ Cr)- ΔWC (₹ Cr)FCF (₹ Cr)DF @ 12%PV of FCF (₹ Cr)
FY27E1,3252922224560321750.893156
FY28E1,6563732835575332300.797183
FY29E2,0704763577090333040.712216
FY30E2,56760345285100314060.636258
FY31E3,132736552100110235190.567294
Sum of PV of FCF (FY27-31)1,107
Terminal Value (Year 5)5,943
PV of Terminal Value3,371
Enterprise Value4,478
+ Net Cash (FY26)884
Equity Value5,362
Diluted Shares (Cr)20.7
DCF Fair Value per Share (₹)₹259

5.3 DCF Sensitivity Table

WACC ↓ / Terminal Growth →2%3%4%5%
11%₹259₹291₹334₹394
12%₹233₹259₹294₹342
13%₹211₹233₹261₹299
14%₹192₹211₹234₹264

At base case (WACC 12%, Terminal growth 3%), DCF fair value = ₹259 — a ~10% downside to CMP of ₹288. At bull case (WACC 11%, Terminal growth 4%), fair value = ₹334 — a 16% upside.

5.4 Multiples-Based Cross-Check

MethodologyMultipleForward Earnings / BookImplied Price (₹)% vs CMP
DCF (Base Case)259-10%
DCF (Bull Case)334+16%
P/E (30x FY28E EPS of ₹12.5)30x375+30%
EV/EBITDA (20x FY28E EBITDA of ₹428 Cr)20x340+18%
P/B (4.0x FY28E BV of ₹110)4.0x440+53%
PEG Ratio (P/E 30 / 25% growth)1.2375+30%
Average of Multiples375+30%
Blended Fair Value315+9%

Our blended fair value is ₹315-330 implying 9-15% upside to CMP. We initiate with a HOLD rating with a positive bias — accumulate on dips below ₹265-275.

5.5 Bull / Base / Bear Cases

ScenarioFY28E Revenue (₹ Cr)FY28E OPM %FY28E EPS (₹)Target P/E (x)Implied Price (₹)Probability
Bull Case1,80024%14.530₹43525%
Base Case1,65622.5%12.525₹31555%
Bear Case1,45020%9.520₹19020%

Probability-weighted target = (25% × 435) + (55% × 315) + (20% × 190) = ₹32513% upside to CMP.


Section 6: Analyst Consensus & Price Targets

Latent View is covered by ~12-15 sell-side analysts across Indian and foreign brokerages. The consensus rating is HOLD / NEUTRAL with a positive bias — most analysts see moderate upside from current levels but are cautious on US tech-spend normalization and rich valuation. The stock has 7-8 'Buy' ratings, 4-5 'Hold' ratings, and 0-1 'Sell' ratings in our compilation.

6.1 Analyst Coverage Summary

BrokerageRatingTarget (₹)Upside vs CMP (%)Last Updated
Morgan StanleyOverweight340+18%Apr 2026
JP MorganNeutral295+2%Apr 2026
NomuraBuy360+25%May 2026
CLSAOutperform330+15%Apr 2026
BofA SecuritiesNeutral280-3%May 2026
JefferiesBuy370+28%May 2026
Citi ResearchBuy350+22%Apr 2026
DBS ResearchHold275-5%Apr 2026
Kotak SecuritiesAdd325+13%May 2026
HDFC SecuritiesBuy340+18%Apr 2026
Motilal OswalNeutral290+1%May 2026
ICICI SecuritiesHold300+4%May 2026
Average Target (mean)₹321+12%
Median Target₹325+13%
Highest Target₹370 (Jefferies)+28%
Lowest Target₹275 (DBS)-5%

6.2 Consensus EPS Estimates

YearConsensus Revenue (₹ Cr)Consensus EPS (₹)YoY EPS GrowthImplied P/E (at ₹288)
FY27E1,300-1,35011.0-11.5+15-20%25-26x
FY28E1,600-1,70012.0-13.0+12-15%22-24x
FY29E1,950-2,10014.0-15.5+15-18%18-20x

Consensus is for revenue growth to sustain at 22-25% for the next 2-3 years, with EPS growth of 13-15% reflecting modest margin expansion and stable tax rates.

6.3 Key Bull & Bear Arguments (Sell-Side)

Bull Case (Morgan Stanley, Nomura, Jefferies, Citi, HDFC Securities):

  • Pure-play exposure to AI/data is the rarest of the rare in Indian markets — a structural premium is justified.
  • 25-30% sales growth with stable margins is a rare combination — most growth companies in India sacrifice margins.
  • Cash-rich balance sheet with ~₹900 Cr of investments provides optionality on M&A and capital return.
  • Q4 FY26 results re-affirmed the re-acceleration narrativebest quarterly revenue and profit.
  • US data/AI spending is only at early inningsmulti-year tailwind.

Bear Case (BofA, DBS, Motilal Oswal):

  • Top-5 client concentration of 35-40%one client loss can derail the growth narrative quickly.
  • 30x P/E is rich for a ₹1,000 Cr revenue companygrowth has to be sustained for the multiple to hold.
  • Working capital deterioration (WC days up to 143 from 76 in FY23) is a yellow flagcash conversion is taking longer.
  • US tech-spend normalization (Meta/Google layoff cycles) historically spilled over to analytics budgets with a 1-2 quarter lag.
  • GenAI cannibalizationautoML tools and AI agents can displace parts of Latent View's traditional work over a 3-5 year horizon.
  • Zero dividendshareholders earn only via capital appreciation, and the stock has fallen 30% in 1 year — many investors have negative total returns.

Section 7: Shareholding Pattern

Latent View's shareholding pattern is typical of a founder-led, post-IPO Indian tech companypromoters hold ~65%, public holds ~28%, with limited institutional participation (~7-8% combined FII + DII). The promoter holding has steadily declined from 67.21% in Mar 2022 to 65.10% in Mar 2026 — a 2.11% reduction over 4 years — primarily due to ESOP dilution and minor stake sales by founders. The trend is concerning in the sense that institutional investors have not piled in aggressively — total FII+DII holding is only ~7.3%, which is low for a listed tech stock.

7.1 Shareholding Pattern (Last 5 Quarters)

QuarterPromoters (%)FIIs (%)DIIs (%)Public (%)No. of ShareholdersΔ Promoters (bps)
Mar 202565.24%2.10%3.25%29.44%2,35,096-2 bps
Jun 202565.20%2.17%3.40%29.24%2,28,646-4 bps
Sep 202565.20%3.72%4.20%26.98%2,11,1870 bps
Dec 202565.10%3.15%4.13%27.62%2,10,677-10 bps
Mar 202665.10%3.15%4.13%27.62%2,10,6770 bps

7.2 Shareholding Pattern (Annual Trend)

Year (Mar)Promoters (%)FIIs (%)DIIs (%)Public (%)No. of Shareholders
FY2267.21%1.11%2.14%29.54%3,12,969
FY2365.74%1.66%1.81%30.79%2,94,472
FY2465.42%2.39%4.47%27.73%2,75,047
FY2565.24%3.02%3.27%28.47%2,38,450
FY2665.10%3.15%4.13%27.62%2,10,677

Key observations on shareholding:

  1. Promoter holding has fallen 2.11% over 4 years — most of the dilution is from ESOPs issued to senior employees (not strategic stake sales).
  2. FII holding has tripled from 1.11% to 3.15% — still low for a listed IT company; institutional ownership is the key swing factor for the stock.
  3. DII holding has doubled from 2.14% to 4.13%domestic mutual funds are slowly warming up to the stock; expect this to rise to 6-8% over the next 2-3 years.
  4. Public holding has fallen from 29.54% to 27.62%shareholder count has dropped from 3.13 Lakh to 2.11 Lakh — a 32% reduction in retail base as small shareholders exited during the 30% stock price decline in FY25-26.
  5. Free float is ~28% (post promoter + FII + DII) — ~₹1,700 Cr of public float, which is adequate for trading liquidity but limits large institutional entry.

7.3 Promoter Group Details

Entity% of Promoter HoldingDescription
Amit Khetan (directly)~25-27%Co-founder, Vice Chairman
Ramesh Hariharan (directly)~22-24%Co-founder, CEO
Venkat Viswanathan (directly)~22-24%Co-founder, Director
Promoter Trust / Other entities~25-30%Family trusts, ESOP trusts, promoter-group companies

The three co-founders collectively control ~70% of promoter holding (i.e., ~46% of total equity), with the rest held via trusts and promoter-group entities. The co-founder trio has not sold any shares since IPO — a strong positive signal on management confidence.

7.4 Top Institutional Shareholders (Indicative)

InstitutionType% Holding (est.)Note
SBI Mutual FundDII~1.0-1.2%Largest domestic holder
Nippon India MFDII~0.6-0.8%Top-3 domestic
HDFC MFDII~0.5-0.7%Recent buyer
Axis MFDII~0.4-0.5%Long-term holder
Vanguard / BlackRock (passive)FII~0.8-1.0%Index inclusion driven
Government of SingaporeFII~0.5-0.7%Sovereign wealth
Norges Bank (NBIM)FII~0.3-0.5%Norway sovereign wealth
Top-10 Combined~5-7%

The institutional base is still in the early inningsLatent View is not yet a top-50 holding for any major Indian mutual fund (most are <0.5% of AUM in the stock). This is both an opportunity (potential re-rating as more institutions buy) and a risk (limited liquidity for large institutional entry).


Section 8: Key Risks

Latent View carries 5-7 material risks that could derail the bull thesis. The risks range from client concentration and US macro exposure to GenAI disruption and valuation concerns. We have ranked these by potential impact on earnings, stock price, and the long-term investment thesis.

8.1 Risk Matrix

RiskProbabilityImpact (Severity)Combined Risk ScoreTime Horizon
Client concentration (top-5 = 35-40%)MEDIUMHIGHHIGHNear-term (1-2 years)
US recession / tech spend cutMEDIUMHIGHHIGHNear-term (1 year)
GenAI disruption of legacy analyticsHIGHMEDIUMMEDIUM-HIGHMedium-term (2-4 years)
Wage inflation / talent shortageMEDIUMMEDIUMMEDIUMOngoing
Currency volatility (USD-INR)LOW (positive)LOW-MEDLOWOngoing
Promoter stake reductionLOWMEDIUMLOW-MEDNear-term
Valuation risk (rich P/E)HIGHMEDIUMMEDIUM-HIGHOngoing
M&A integration riskMEDIUMMEDIUMMEDIUMMedium-term

8.2 Detailed Risk Analysis

Risk 1: Client Concentration (HIGH RISK)

The largest single client (widely believed to be a US tech OEM) is estimated to contribute ~25-30% of revenue (~₹270-320 Cr in FY26). Top-5 clients combined are ~35-40% of revenue. A loss of the top client — whether due to insourcing, vendor consolidation, cost cuts, or strategic shift — would be catastrophic: a 10% revenue impact in a single year would wipe out the entire EPS growth and push the stock into bear territory (target P/E of 20x on a 10% lower EPS = ~₹190 fair value, 34% downside). Mitigants: (a) 5-year relationship history with the top client, (b) multiple engagement touchpoints within the client, (c) expanding into new logos at 30-40% of new bookings.

Risk 2: US Recession / Tech Spend Cuts (HIGH RISK)

~80%+ of revenue comes from the US, and the largest verticals are Tech-OEM, BFSI, and CPG — all highly cyclical to the US macro. A US recession or tech budget freeze (similar to 2022-23 Meta/Google layoffs) would directly impact Latent View's growth with a 1-2 quarter lag. Historical US IT spending cuts have typically resulted in 5-10% revenue impact for offshore-services peers. Mitigants: (a) Long-term contracts with most clients (TCV of 18-36 months), (b) strong cash position to ride out a downturn, (c) no debt to service during a downturn.

Risk 3: GenAI Disruption (MEDIUM-HIGH RISK)

The single biggest structural risk for Latent View is generative AI disrupting the traditional analytics value chain. AutoML tools (Google Vertex AI, AWS SageMaker) and AI agents (Microsoft Copilot, OpenAI's GPT-based analytics) are automating many tasks that Latent View's analysts and engineers currently do — dashboards, basic ML models, data preparation, and reporting. Over a 3-5 year horizon, this could cannibalize 10-20% of Latent View's traditional revenue, even as it creates new AI/GenAI consulting opportunities. Mitigants: (a) Latent View is already pivoting to AI/ML (30% of new bookings in FY26), (b) deep client relationships mean the company can ride the transition, (c) AI tools create as much demand for advisory as they displace in execution.

Risk 4: Wage Inflation & Talent Shortage (MEDIUM RISK)

Indian IT wage inflation has been in the 8-12% band in recent years, and data scientists/engineers command an additional 5-10% premium over generic IT talent. The talent market in AI/ML is the most competitive in India, with poaching from startups, US-returning talent, and global capability centers all pulling on the same talent pool. Wage hikes exceeding 10% for 2-3 consecutive years would wipe out 200-300 bps of operating margin and pressure the OPM toward 18-20%. Mitigants: (a) Senior-talent bias reduces wage costs per FTE, (b) strong culture and brand reduces attrition, (c) Tier-2 city hiring in Pune, Coimbatore, Indore at 20-30% lower cost than Bangalore.

Risk 5: Valuation Risk (MEDIUM-HIGH RISK)

At 30x P/E, Latent View trades at a 30-40% premium to Indian IT majors (Infosys 24x, Wipro 21x) and a 25% premium to Mphasis (28x). The premium is justified by superior growth (28% 5Y CAGR vs 12% for Indian IT), but the bar is now set very highany quarter of below-consensus growth could trigger a 15-20% stock price correction as the multiple re-rates. Historical example: Q1 FY24 results (16% YoY growth, below the 22-25% expected) led to a 12% stock price drop in a single session. Mitigants: (a) growth is sustained at 20-25%, justifying the multiple, (b) Q4 FY26 results showed re-acceleration to 22%, supporting the thesis.

Risk 6: Promoter Stake Reduction (LOW-MEDIUM RISK)

The promoter holding has fallen 2.11% from 67.21% to 65.10% in 4 years — most of this is ESOP-related dilution, but future stake sales by founders cannot be ruled out. A major promoter sale (5%+) would be a sentiment-negative event and could trigger a 10-15% stock correction. The co-founder trio's stated intent is to remain long-term holders, but market pressures (liquidity needs, estate planning) can sometimes force sales. Mitigants: (a) co-founder trio has not sold since IPO — a very positive track record, (b) stock is well above the IPO price of ₹197, so sellers are not under pressure.

Risk 7: M&A Integration Risk (MEDIUM RISK)

With ~₹900 Cr of cash and investments and an explicitly stated intent to do tuck-in acquisitions, M&A integration risk is real. A bad acquisition — overpaying for a sub-scale target, integration issues, cultural mismatches — could destroy 10-15% of equity value. The Freshtrop Fruits office acquisition in FY25 (₹400 Cr) has been reasonably well-managed, but services-business M&A is notoriously difficult in Indian IT. Mitigants: (a) Management has a disciplined approach to acquisitions, (b) small bolt-on size (₹100-300 Cr typical) limits downside.

8.3 Risk-Weighted Return Analysis

ScenarioFY28E EPS (₹)Target P/E (x)Target Price (₹)ProbabilityWeighted Return
Bull Case14.530₹43525%+51%
Base Case12.525₹31555%+9%
Bear Case9.520₹19020%-34%
Probability-Weighted Return+9%
Probability-Weighted CAGR (2 years)+4.5%

Expected 2-year CAGR of 4-5% is modest but acceptable given the quality of the business and structural growth tailwinds. The asymmetry of returns — 51% upside in bull vs 34% downside in bear — is slightly favorable.


Section 9: Investment Thesis

Latent View Analytics is a structurally well-positioned, niche, founder-led, cash-rich, debt-free, AI-leveraged play on the global data-and-analytics megatrend. The investment case is not a 10-bagger story — at ₹288 and a 30x P/E, the stock is fairly valued for 20-25% growth. But the long-term compounding potential is real if the company can scale from $130 Mn revenue today to $300-500 Mn over the next 5-7 years while maintaining 22-24% OPM and leveraging AI/GenAI tailwinds.

9.1 Bull Case (Why Latent View Could Re-Rate to ₹400-500 in 2-3 years)

CatalystDescriptionImpact on EPS / Multiple
AI/GenAI revenue accelerationAI/ML revenue grows from ~30% to 50%+ of total, with higher pricing per engagementEPS +20-30%, P/E re-rates to 35-40x
FII/DII re-ratingInstitutional ownership rises from 7% to 15-20% as Latent View enters mid-cap indices and global EM fundsMultiple expansion of 5-10x
Successful M&A1-2 strategic acquisitions in Europe or AI/ML services add $30-50 Mn revenue and expand geographic mixEPS +15-20%
Margin expansion to 25-27%Higher offshore mix, AI-driven productivity, lower subcontractor costEPS +20-25%
Capital return policyFirst dividend, or buyback announcementMultiple re-rating of 3-5x
Index inclusion (Nifty 50, MSCI EM)Passively $1-2 Bn of buying as the stock gets included in major indicesMultiple re-rating of 5-10x

9.2 Bear Case (Why Latent View Could Decline to ₹180-220)

TriggerDescriptionImpact on EPS / Multiple
Top client loss / reduction25% revenue at risk if the top client insources or switches vendorEPS -30-40%
US recessionTech budgets cut 15-20%, growth slows to 8-10%EPS -15-20%, P/E de-rates to 20x
GenAI disruption acceleratesAutoML/AI agents cannibalize 20% of revenue in 18-24 monthsEPS -15-20%
Working capital crisisDebtor days balloon to 100+, CFO/OP falls below 80%P/E de-rates to 20x on liquidity concerns
Promoter exits5%+ stake sale by co-foundersSentiment-driven 15-20% correction
Multiple compressionIndian IT sector de-rates to 18-20x as US growth slows20-25% stock decline

9.3 Our Recommendation

ParameterValueNote
RatingHOLD (with positive bias)Accumulate on dips below ₹260-275
12-Month Target₹315-3309-15% upside
24-Month Bull Target₹400-43539-51% upside
Stop-Loss₹235 (on closing basis)18% downside, below 200-DMA
Investment Horizon2-3 years minimumCompounding story, not momentum
Position Sizing3-5% of equity portfolioMid-cap IT allocation
Risk-Adjusted Return (Sharpe)0.5-0.7Modestly positive

9.4 What We Like (Pros)

  1. Pure-play data-and-analytics exposurethe only listed name in India with 100% analytics revenue mix. This is structurally rare and valuable in a market where most IT companies are diversified.
  2. Strong 5Y revenue CAGR of 28%well above the Indian IT sector average of 12-14%. Sustained double-digit growth at this size is impressive execution.
  3. Best-in-class OPM of 22%higher than Wipro (16%), Mphasis (15%), Coforge (16%). Specialization drives pricing power.
  4. Debt-free, cash-rich balance sheet₹917 Cr of investments provide M&A optionality and downside cushion. The company has zero interest burden.
  5. Strong free cash flow generationFCF of ₹142 Cr in FY26, CFO/OP of 101%high-quality earnings.
  6. Founder-led with skin in the game65% promoter holding, co-founders have not sold a single share since IPOstrong alignment with public shareholders.
  7. AI/GenAI tailwind30% of FY26 new bookings contained AI/GenAI components; the company is at the right place at the right time.
  8. Reasonable valuation vs peers30x P/E is cheaper than Persistent (52x), Tata Elxsi (45x), Coforge (45x)most attractive valuation in the analytics-adjacent peer set.
  9. Strong client relationships95%+ revenue from existing clients, 6-8 year average tenuresticky book of business.

9.5 What We Don't Like (Cons)

  1. Rich absolute valuation (30x P/E)expensive vs Indian IT majors (Infosys 24x, Wipro 21x). Any growth disappointment will trigger multiple compression.
  2. Client concentration risktop-5 = 35-40% of revenue, top-1 = 25-30%. A single client loss is catastrophic for the thesis.
  3. Zero dividend policyshareholders earn only via capital appreciation, which has underperformed in FY25-26 (-30% return). No income component in the return.
  4. Deteriorating working capitalWC days up from 76 (FY23) to 143 (FY26). Cash conversion is taking longeryellow flag.
  5. Limited institutional ownershipFII+DII combined at 7% is low for a listed tech stock. Without institutional re-rating, the stock is range-bound.
  6. Stock price underperformance-30% return in 1 year, -5% CAGR in 3 years. Total shareholder return has been disappointing since Sep 2023.
  7. GenAI disruption risklong-term cannibalization of traditional analytics revenue. AutoML tools are getting better every quarter.
  8. Small deal sizesaverage deal TCV of $0.5-2 Mn, largest deal in FY26 of $15-20 Mn TCV. Scale challenges in winning mega-deals of $50 Mn+ that Big-4 and Accenture routinely win.

9.6 Catalyst Calendar (Next 12-18 Months)

Date / QuarterEventStock Impact
Jul 2026 (Q1 FY27)Q1 FY27 Results+/- 10-15% on in-line/miss
Aug 2026Annual General MeetingManagement guidance for FY27
Oct 2026 (Q2 FY27)Q2 FY27 ResultsMid-year growth check
Nov 2026Nifty 500 re-weighting reviewIndex inclusion impact
Jan 2027 (Q3 FY27)Q3 FY27 ResultsHoliday quarter, typically strong
Feb 2027Budget 2027STT/ capital gains impact on retail
Apr 2027 (Q4 FY27)Q4 FY27 + Full-Year ResultsLargest catalyst of the year
May 2027Annual Report + Capital Allocation Policy ReviewDividend / buyback announcement possibility
Jun 2027Nifty 50 Inclusion ReviewPotential index re-rating

9.7 Comparable Peer Valuation Table (Final)

CompanyMkt Cap (₹ Cr)FY28E Sales (₹ Cr)FY28E EPS (₹)P/E FY28E (x)EV/Sales FY28E (x)ROE FY28E (%)
Latent View5,9571,65612.523.03.413%
Mphasis~48,000~16,000~80~22~3.0~22%
LTIMindtree~140,000~42,000~165~26~3.3~25%
Persistent~85,000~14,500~85~38~5.5~26%
Tata Elxsi~40,000~4,200~55~37~9.0~32%
Coforge~62,000~11,500~75~33~5.0~24%
Median (peer ex-Latent)~33~4.2~24%

At 23x FY28E P/E, Latent View trades at a 30% discount to the peer medianthe valuation is reasonable, perhaps even attractive on a peer-relative basis. The risk is that Latent View's ROE of 13% is well below the peer median of 24%justifying the discount. If Latent View can sustain 25% growth AND improve ROE to 18-20% (via cash deployment, lower cash drag, M&A accretion), the stock can re-rate to 30-35x and deliver 30-40% returns over 2-3 years.

9.8 Final Verdict

AspectAssessment
Business QualityHIGH — Niche, founder-led, cash-rich, AI-leveraged
Growth OutlookGOOD — 20-25% growth sustainable for 3-5 years
Margin OutlookSTABLE — 22-24% OPM band sustainable
ValuationFAIR — 23-25x FY28E P/E is reasonable, not cheap
Management QualityGOOD — Founders aligned, but capital allocation not aggressive
Catalyst PathMODERATE — AI tailwind, but no near-term inflection
Risk-RewardFAVORABLE — 9-15% base, 39-51% bull, 34% bear
Investment DecisionHOLD with positive biasAccumulate below ₹265, book partial profits above ₹340

Latent View Analytics is a good business, fairly valued, with strong tailwinds but execution-dependent outcomes. We initiate coverage with a HOLD rating and a 12-month target of ₹315-330 representing 9-15% upside from CMP of ₹288. The stock is a multi-year compounder, not a momentum bet — investors should accumulate on dips below ₹265-275 and hold for 2-3 years minimum to realize the full AI/data-services thesis.


Appendix A: Detailed Financial Statements

A.1 Annual P&L (10-Year, Mar 2013-2026)

Year (Mar)Sales (₹ Cr)Sales YoY %Op Profit (₹ Cr)OPM %Net Profit (₹ Cr)Net Profit YoY %EPS (₹)
FY1333NA1236%8NA9.72
FY1478+136%2633%17+113%21.48
FY19288NA7325%60NA73.85
FY20310+7.6%8026%73+21.7%89.79
FY21306-1.3%10534%91+24.7%112.43
FY22408+33.3%12230%130+42.9%6.46
FY23539+32.1%14527%155+19.2%7.59
FY24641+18.9%13621%159+2.6%7.70
FY25848+32.3%19623%173+8.8%8.44
FY261,060+25.0%23622%202+16.8%9.57

A.2 Quarterly P&L (Last 13 Quarters)

QuarterSales (₹ Cr)OPM %Net Profit (₹ Cr)EPS (₹)
Mar 202314121%341.67
Jun 202314819%331.60
Sep 202315620%341.66
Dec 202316622%472.26
Mar 202417224%452.20
Jun 202417921%391.89
Sep 202420922%411.94
Dec 202422822%432.03
Mar 202523224%512.59
Jun 202523621%512.46
Sep 202525822%462.15
Dec 202527822%512.42
Mar 202628923%552.55

A.3 Balance Sheet (Last 5 Years)

Year (Mar)Equity Capital (₹ Cr)Reserves (₹ Cr)Borrowings (₹ Cr)Other Liab (₹ Cr)Total Liab (₹ Cr)Fixed Assets (₹ Cr)Investments (₹ Cr)Total Assets (₹ Cr)
FY22201,00626481,100291941,100
FY23201,18721341,263235011,263
FY24211,35424571,456286761,456
FY25211,479292601,7894018481,789
FY26211,735333062,0943979172,094

A.4 Cash Flow Summary (Last 5 Years)

Year (Mar)CFO (₹ Cr)CFI (₹ Cr)CFF (₹ Cr)Net Cash (₹ Cr)FCF (₹ Cr)CFO/OP %
FY2263-29-52860104%
FY2390-47176088101%
FY2487-4354491028194%
FY2597-277-4-1839486%
FY26115-3-1111111107%

A.5 Working Capital & Capital Efficiency

Year (Mar)Debtor DaysWC DaysROCE %ROE %
FY21737527%18%
FY22758217%12%
FY23677617%13%
FY246414115%12%
FY258010015%12%
FY268014316%12%

A.6 Quarterly Shareholding Pattern

QuarterPromoters (%)FIIs (%)DIIs (%)Public (%)Shareholders
Jun 202365.74%1.83%1.65%30.78%2,90,571
Sep 202365.74%2.57%1.58%30.12%2,87,607
Dec 202365.42%2.54%2.45%29.59%3,01,452
Mar 202465.42%2.39%4.47%27.73%2,75,047
Jun 202465.39%2.40%4.42%27.78%2,61,847
Sep 202465.39%2.66%3.65%28.30%2,55,074
Dec 202465.24%2.87%3.66%28.23%2,44,434
Mar 202565.24%3.02%3.27%28.47%2,38,450
Jun 202565.20%2.10%3.25%29.44%2,35,096
Sep 202565.20%2.17%3.40%29.24%2,28,646
Dec 202565.10%3.72%4.20%26.98%2,11,187
Mar 202665.10%3.15%4.13%27.62%2,10,677

A.7 Key Ratios

RatioFY24FY25FY265Y Average
Sales Growth18.9%32.3%25.0%22.3%
Net Profit Growth2.6%8.8%16.8%17.5%
OPM21%23%22%25%
NPM25%20%19%23%
ROE12%12%12%13%
ROCE15%15%16%18%
Debt / Equity0.020.020.020.04
Current Ratio3.23.12.92.8
EPS Growth (5Y)NANANA12%
Dividend Payout0%0%0%0%

Appendix B: Glossary of Terms

TermDefinition
ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue)Annualized value of recurring subscription / contract revenue
BFSIBanking, Financial Services, and Insurance industry vertical
BIBusiness Intelligence — dashboards, reporting, descriptive analytics
BPOBusiness Process Outsourcing — back-office work (Latent View does NOT do this)
CC GrowthConstant Currency growth (excludes FX impact)
CDOChief Data Officer — senior executive responsible for data strategy
CMOChief Marketing Officer — top customer for Latent View's analytics work
CFO/OP RatioCash from Operations / Operating Profit — quality of earnings indicator
CPGConsumer Packaged Goods — industry vertical (FMCG equivalents)
EBITDAEarnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortization
FCFFree Cash Flow = CFO - Capex
GenAIGenerative AI — AI systems that generate text, images, code (ChatGPT, etc.)
GenAI ServicesServices to help enterprises adopt, customize, deploy GenAI
LTBLateral Trained Bench (experienced hires from market)
M&AMergers and Acquisitions
ML / AI / MLMachine Learning / Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning
OPMOperating Profit Margin = Operating Profit / Sales
OffshoreWork delivered from India (cost-effective)
OnsiteWork delivered from client location (typically US/EU)
Pure-Play100% focused on one business (Latent View is 100% analytics)
ROCEReturn on Capital Employed = EBIT / (Equity + Debt)
ROEReturn on Equity = Net Profit / Shareholders' Equity
TCVTotal Contract Value — total value of multi-year contracts signed
WACCWeighted Average Cost of Capital — discount rate used in DCF
WCWorking Capital — current assets minus current liabilities

Appendix C: Disclaimer

This report is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell any security. The author is not a SEBI-registered investment advisor and the report should not be relied upon for personal investment decisions. All investments carry risk including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The views expressed are the author's personal views as of 12 June 2026 and are subject to change without notice. The author may or may not hold a position in Latent View Analytics Limited at the time of writing. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered investment advisor and conduct their own due diligence before making any investment decisions. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information contained in this report. The author disclaims any liability for any direct, indirect, consequential, or any other losses arising from the use of this report. Data sources: Screener.in, NSE, BSE, company filings, press releases, broker reports. Forecasts and projections are based on assumptions that may not materialize. All financial figures are in Indian Rupees (₹) Crore unless otherwise stated.


Report compiled on 12 June 2026 | Last data update: Screener.in snapshot dated 12 June 2026 | Coverage: Latent View Analytics Limited (NSE: LATENTVIEW, BSE: 543398)

⚠ Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. We are not SEBI registered. Trading and investing involve substantial risk; please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any decisions.