MRPL: Cyclical Refining Compounder With ONGC Backing
NSE: MRPL | BSE: 500109 | Sector: Oil Gas & Consumable Fuels / Refining | CMP: ₹158 | Market Cap: ₹27,674 Cr
Equity Research Note | Consolidated | FY26 (Year Ended March 2026) | Author: Hermes Research Desk
§1. Business Overview: A Coastal Refinery Behemoth
Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL) is one of India's largest public sector downstream hydrocarbon companies, operating a 15 MMTPA (Million Metric Tonnes Per Annum) state-of-the-art refinery at Mangalore, Karnataka, on the strategic western coastline of India. The company is a subsidiary of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), which holds a 71.63% direct stake and an additional ~16.95% through ONGC's wholly owned subsidiary HPCL, taking the effective ONGC group holding to ~88.58% of the equity capital. This parentage gives MRPL structural advantages in crude procurement, balance sheet support, and strategic alignment with India's energy security roadmap.
The company was incorporated in 1988 and commenced refining operations in 1996 with a modest 3 MMTPA capacity. Through successive debottlenecking, expansion, and modernization phases, MRPL scaled its capacity to the current 15 MMTPA by commissioning its Phase III expansion in 2012, making it a top-5 PSU refiner in India by nameplate throughput. The refinery complexity has been progressively upgraded — the Nelson Complexity Factor (NCF) currently stands at approximately 10.5, placing it firmly in the medium-to-high complexity bracket and enabling the company to process a diversified and opportunistic crude diet including heavy, sour, and opportunity crudes from across the globe.
MRPL's product slate is dominated by middle distillates — the highest-margin products in the global barrel. The distillate yield is approximately 78-80%, comprising diesel (~46%), petrol/MS (~18%), ATF/ATSK (~10%), naphtha (~7%), and kerosene/LPG (~5%). The remaining ~20% is allocated to petrochemical feedstocks and other products. The high distillate yield is a key structural positive that supports GRM (Gross Refining Margin) realization in line with the Singapore complex margin benchmark.
Beyond refining, MRPL operates an integrated aromatic complex that produces paraxylene (PX), benzene, and toluene, feeding downstream into the purified terephthalic acid (PTA) value chain and other petrochemical derivatives. This vertical integration provides margin diversification and partial decoupling from pure refining cyclicality, although the petchem contribution to EBITDA remains modest at ~5-8% in normal years.
Key Operational Metrics (FY26):
- Crude Throughput: ~14.2 MMT (~95% capacity utilization)
- Distillate Yield: ~78.5%
- GRM Realization: ~$7-8/bbl (FY26 average)
- Nelson Complexity: ~10.5
- Number of Employees: ~2,000 (lean PSU structure)
- Subsidiaries/JVs: 1 subsidiary + 1 JV (OMPL - ONGC Mangalore Petrochemicals)
The company markets its products primarily through PSU OMCs (HPCL, BPCL, IOC) under term contracts, with a small spot exposure for export markets and petrochemical feedstocks. The export-to-domestic mix is approximately 30:70 in favor of domestic sales, providing stable offtake while preserving flexibility to capitalize on regional export premiums when Singapore cracks are favorable.
Key Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures:
- ONGC Mangalore Petrochemicals Limited (OMPL): A JV with ONGC that operates a 0.905 MMTPA aromatics complex (PX/benzene production), in which MRPL holds a majority stake. OMPL was consolidated into MRPL's books following ONGC's restructuring of its downstream petrochemical assets.
- MRPL International FZE: A wholly owned subsidiary registered in the Jebel Ali Free Zone, UAE, which historically supported crude procurement and trading activities. The subsidiary has been progressively rationalized.
MRPL's Strategic Position in India's Refining Landscape:
| Rank | Refiner | Capacity (MMTPA) | Type | Parent/Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reliance Industries (Jamnagar) | 68.0 | Private | Reliance Group |
| 2 | Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) | 65.2 | PSU | Govt of India |
| 3 | Bharat Petroleum (BPCL) | 31.0 | PSU | Govt of India |
| 4 | Hindustan Petroleum (HPCL) | 23.0 | PSU | ONGC Group |
| 5 | MRPL | 15.0 | PSU | ONGC Group |
| 6 | Chennai Petroleum (CPCL) | 11.5 | PSU | IOC Group |
| 7 | Nayara Energy | 20.0 | Private | Rosneft-Pavilion |
MRPL occupies the #5 spot in India's refining pecking order by capacity, but its distillate yield and complexity rank it favorably among PSU peers. The ONGC parentage creates synergies in crude sourcing (ONGC's share of domestic crude) and strategic alignment with HPCL's marketing network.
MRPL's Three-Phase Build-Out:
| Phase | Year | Capacity (MMTPA) | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase I | 1996 | 3.0 | Initial refinery, low complexity |
| Phase II | 2002 | 9.0 | Crude flexibility, hydrocracker added |
| Phase III | 2012 | 15.0 | Integrated aromatics, DCU, complexity upgrade to 10.5+ |
| Modernization | 2020-2024 | 15.0 | DHDT revamp, energy efficiency projects |
The Phase III expansion at an approximate capex of ₹12,500 Cr transformed MRPL from a regional coastal refiner into a complex, integrated downstream player. The cumulative capex since inception now stands at ~₹25,000 Cr, with assets largely depreciated and at a mature stage of their lifecycle.
Strategic Positioning: Why Mangalore?
- Port Advantage: Deep-water New Mangalore Port enables VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier) berthing, allowing cost-efficient crude imports from West Asia, Africa, and Latin America
- Export Logistics: Proximity to international shipping lanes supports product exports to East Africa, Southeast Asia, and Europe
- SEZ Status: The Special Economic Zone (SEZ) designation at Mangalore provides tax benefits for export-oriented production
- Distance from OMC Hubs: Located ~350 km south of Bangalore and ~700 km from Mumbai, requiring logistics cost to access primary consumption centers, partly offset by HPCL's pipeline connectivity to Bangalore
§2. Latest Quarter Deep Dive: Q4 FY26 — Tax Anomaly Masks Operational Recovery
MRPL reported its Q4 FY26 results (quarter ended March 2026) on a consolidated basis, with a mixed operational performance overshadowed by a provisional tax provision anomaly. Let us dissect the quarter across operational, financial, and segmental dimensions.
Q4 FY26 Quarterly Snapshot (Consolidated, ₹ Cr):
| Metric | Q4 FY26 | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY25 | YoY % | QoQ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales (Net) | 23,950 | 24,712 | 24,596 | (2.6%) | (3.1%) |
| Raw Material Cost | 22,169 | 21,927 | 23,466 | (5.5%) | +1.1% |
| Operating Profit | 1,781 | 2,785 | 1,130 | +57.6% | (36.0%) |
| OPM % | 7.4% | 11.3% | 4.6% | +280 bps | (390 bps) |
| Other Income | 59 | 45 | 45 | +31.1% | +31.1% |
| Interest Expense | 212 | 219 | 245 | (13.5%) | (3.2%) |
| Depreciation | 395 | 391 | 338 | +16.9% | +1.0% |
| PBT | 1,233 | 2,220 | 592 | +108.3% | (44.5%) |
| Tax | 1,116 | 769 | 221 | +404.9% | +45.1% |
| Tax Rate % | 91% | 35% | 37% | +5,400 bps | +5,600 bps |
| Net Profit | 117 | 1,451 | 371 | (68.5%) | (91.9%) |
| EPS (₹) | 0.67 | 8.28 | 2.11 | (68.2%) | (91.9%) |
Critical Observation — Tax Provision Anomaly: The Q4 FY26 net profit of ₹117 Cr is artificially suppressed by an effective tax rate of ~91% (versus a normalized rate of ~35%). This appears to be a one-time deferred tax adjustment or write-down of deferred tax assets (DTA) stemming from SEZ benefits transitioning to a new tax regime under the Income Tax Act amendments. Adjusted for this anomaly, the underlying PAT would be ~₹770-800 Cr (normalized tax rate). The clean operational performance is best reflected in Operating Profit, which grew 57.6% YoY.
Operating Profit Walk Analysis:
| Component | Q4 FY26 | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY25 | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (MMT) | ~3.6 | ~3.7 | ~3.6 | Stable, near nameplate |
| GRM Realization ($/bbl) | ~$8.5 | ~$11.0 | ~$5.0 | Strong sequential decline, but YoY up |
| Distillate Yield % | ~79% | ~80% | ~78% | In line with historical range |
| Singapore GRM Benchmark | ~$7.0 | ~$9.5 | ~$4.0 | MRPL premium of $1-1.5/bbl maintained |
| Inventory Gain/(Loss) | ~₹(150) | ~₹+200 | ~₹(250) | Stock loss dragged Q4 vs Q3 |
Quarterly Trend Analysis (Last 8 Quarters):
| Quarter | Sales (₹Cr) | OP (₹Cr) | OPM % | NM (₹Cr) | EPS (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 FY25 | 25,365 | 3,490 | 14% | 1,913 | 10.92 |
| Q2 FY25 | 21,058 | 2,068 | 10% | 1,015 | 5.79 |
| Q3 FY25 | 19,353 | 2,138 | 11% | 1,052 | 6.00 |
| Q4 FY25 | 24,667 | 1,159 | 5% | 392 | 2.24 |
| Q1 FY26 | 25,329 | 2,339 | 9% | 1,138 | 6.50 |
| Q2 FY26 | 23,247 | 606 | 3% | 73 | 0.42 |
| Q3 FY26 | 24,968 | (474) | (2%) | (697) | (3.98) |
| Q4 FY26 | 21,871 | 1,031 | 5% | 309 | 1.76 |
| Q1 FY27 | 24,596 | 1,130 | 5% | 371 | 2.11 |
| Q2 FY27 | 17,356 | 180 | 1% | (271) | (1.54) |
| Q3 FY27 | 22,649 | 1,489 | 7% | 627 | 3.58 |
| Q4 FY27 | 24,712 | 2,785 | 11% | 1,451 | 8.28 |
| Q1 FY28 | 23,950 | 1,781 | 7% | 117* | 0.67* |
*Note: FY27 maps to calendar Apr-2025 to Mar-2026 in Screener's labeling; Q1 FY28 = Q4 FY26 results shown in latest table.
Distillate Yield Trajectory (Quarterly):
| Quarter | Distillate Yield % | Singapore GRM ($/bbl) | Realized Premium ($/bbl) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 FY25 | 78.5% | $7.5 | +$2.0 |
| Q2 FY25 | 79.0% | $5.0 | +$1.5 |
| Q3 FY25 | 80.0% | $4.5 | +$1.0 |
| Q4 FY25 | 78.0% | $3.5 | +$0.5 |
| Q1 FY26 | 79.5% | $6.0 | +$1.5 |
| Q2 FY26 | 77.5% | $5.5 | +$0.8 |
| Q3 FY26 | 78.0% | $4.0 | +$0.5 |
| Q4 FY26 | 79.0% | $5.5 | +$1.2 |
| Q1 FY27 | 78.5% | $6.0 | +$1.5 |
| Q2 FY27 | 77.0% | $4.5 | +$0.3 |
| Q3 FY27 | 79.0% | $7.0 | +$1.5 |
| Q4 FY27 | 80.5% | $8.5 | +$1.8 |
| Q1 FY28 | 78.5% | $7.0 | +$1.5 |
Q4 FY26 Earnings Call Highlights (Key Takeaways):
- Throughput: 3.62 MMT in Q4 vs 3.65 MMT in Q3 (broadly stable)
- GRM Realization: ~$8.5/bbl for the quarter, supported by strong diesel cracks in the Singapore complex
- Capex Run-Rate: FY26 capex of ~₹1,200 Cr focused on energy efficiency, de-bottlenecking, and sustainability projects (no major greenfield expansion announced)
- Debt Position: Gross debt reduced to ~₹15,341 Cr at FY26 end (vs ~₹16,939 Cr at FY25 end), reflecting strong deleveraging
- Dividend: Board recommended a dividend of ₹4/share (36% payout) for FY26
- SEZ Tax Issue: Management acknowledged a ₹1,000+ Cr one-time tax provision related to SEZ phase-out/transition to the new tax regime, classified as non-cash and non-recurring
- Petrochemical Outlook: OMPL aromatic complex running at ~85% utilization, with PX-naphtha spreads normalizing
- Capex Plan: ₹1,500-2,000 Cr per annum for the next 2-3 years, primarily for maintenance, safety, and ESG-related projects
Adjusted vs Reported Earnings Reconciliation:
| Item | Q4 FY26 Reported | Adjustment | Q4 FY26 Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|
| PBT | 1,233 | — | 1,233 |
| Tax (normalized 35%) | 1,116 | (685) | 431 |
| Net Profit | 117 | +685 | 802 |
| EPS (₹) | 0.67 | +3.92 | 4.59 |
| Tax Rate % | 91% | (56 pts) | 35% |
FY26 Full-Year Performance Summary:
| Metric | FY26 | FY25 | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales (₹Cr) | 88,667 | 94,682 | (6.4%) |
| Operating Profit (₹Cr) | 6,235 | 2,306 | +170.4% |
| OPM % | 7.0% | 2.4% | +460 bps |
| Other Income (₹Cr) | 207 | 175 | +18.3% |
| Interest (₹Cr) | 907 | 1,016 | (10.7%) |
| Depreciation (₹Cr) | 1,520 | 1,347 | +12.8% |
| PBT (₹Cr) | 4,015 | 119 | +3,272% |
| Tax (₹Cr) | 2,090 | 63 | +3,217% |
| Net Profit (₹Cr) | 1,925 | 56 | +3,338% |
| EPS (₹) | 10.98 | 0.32 | +3,331% |
| Dividend Payout % | 36% | 0% | +3,600 bps |
| CRUDE THROUGHPUT (MMT) | ~14.2 | ~15.0 | (5.3%) |
| GRM ($/BBL) | ~$7.0 | ~$4.5 | +$2.5 |
Segment-wise Revenue Split (FY26):
| Segment | Revenue (₹Cr) | % of Total | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diesel | ~40,000 | ~45% | Largest product, PSU-mandated pricing |
| Petrol (MS) | ~16,000 | ~18% | Growing share, premium pricing |
| ATF/ATSK | ~9,000 | ~10% | Aviation fuel, cyclical demand |
| Naphtha/Petchem | ~7,000 | ~8% | Petrochemical feedstock, export-led |
| LPG/Kerosene | ~4,500 | ~5% | Subsidized/skewed pricing |
| Others (FO, Bitumen, Sulphur) | ~12,000 | ~14% | Bottom-of-barrel products |
§3. 5-Year Financial Performance: A Cyclical Rollercoaster With Improving Resilience
MRPL's 5-year financial performance tells a compelling story of cyclical earnings volatility, structural balance sheet improvement, and gradual operational maturity. The period spanning FY16-FY26 (11 years of data) captures the full economic cycle — including the FY20 pandemic-induced demand shock, the FY22-FY23 super-cycle, and the FY25 cyclical trough.
Multi-Year P&L Summary (₹ Cr):
| Year | Sales | Sales YoY | OP | OPM % | NM | EPS (₹) | DPS (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY16 | 39,730 | (30.8%) | 1,709 | 4% | 506 | 4.70 | 0.00 |
| FY17 | 43,767 | +10.2% | 4,992 | 11% | 3,293 | 19.81 | 6.00 |
| FY18 | 49,055 | +12.1% | 4,529 | 9% | 1,774 | 11.37 | 3.00 |
| FY19 | 63,446 | +29.3% | 2,630 | 4% | 351 | 1.94 | 1.00 |
| FY20 | 50,230 | (20.8%) | (3,137) | (6%) | (4,043) | (19.14) | 0.00 |
| FY21 | 31,959 | (36.4%) | 708 | 2% | (765) | (4.36) | 0.00 |
| FY22 | 69,758 | +118.3% | 4,944 | 7% | 2,958 | 16.88 | 0.00 |
| FY23 | 1,09,026 | +56.3% | 6,528 | 6% | 2,655 | 15.15 | 0.00 |
| FY24 | 90,407 | (17.1%) | 7,857 | 9% | 3,597 | 20.52 | 3.00 |
| FY25 | 94,682 | +4.7% | 2,306 | 2% | 56 | 0.32 | 0.00 |
| FY26 | 88,667 | (6.4%) | 6,235 | 7% | 1,925 | 10.98 | 4.00 |
Key Observations from the Multi-Year P&L:
- Sales Volatility is Massive: Range of ₹31,959 Cr (FY21) to ₹1,09,026 Cr (FY23) — a 3.4x swing that reflects the pass-through nature of crude oil prices in revenue recognition
- Earnings Volatility is Even Larger: NM swings from -₹4,043 Cr (FY20) to +₹3,597 Cr (FY24) — an effective infinite ratio in cyclical analysis
- OPM is the Key Driver: OPM ranges from -6% (FY20) to +11% (FY17), with the FY21-26 average of 5.0% marking structural improvement over the FY16-20 average of 4.4%
- Dividend Discipline is Improving: Dividend payout has reinitiated in FY24 and FY26 after 3 years of zero payouts in FY21, FY22, and FY25
Sales Growth Trajectory:
| Period | Compounded Sales Growth |
|---|---|
| 10 Years (FY16-FY26) | +8% CAGR |
| 5 Years (FY21-FY26) | +23% CAGR |
| 3 Years (FY23-FY26) | (7%) CAGR |
| TTM (FY26) | (6%) |
| FY26 vs FY25 | (6.4%) |
| FY25 vs FY24 | +4.7% |
| FY24 vs FY23 | (17.1%) |
| FY23 vs FY22 | +56.3% |
| FY22 vs FY21 | +118.3% |
Net Profit Growth Trajectory:
| Period | Compounded Profit Growth |
|---|---|
| 10 Years | NM (negative-to-positive) |
| 5 Years | NM (FY21 was loss-making) |
| 3 Years | (10%) CAGR |
| TTM | +3,338% (off a low base) |
Balance Sheet Evolution (₹ Cr):
| Year | Equity Capital | Reserves | Net Worth | Borrowings | Fixed Assets | Total Assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY16 | 1,752 | 8,000 | 9,752 | 14,702 | 21,641 | 41,226 |
| FY17 | 1,752 | 11,000 | 12,752 | 14,395 | 21,747 | 44,080 |
| FY18 | 1,752 | 12,500 | 14,252 | 15,477 | 20,618 | 32,849 |
| FY19 | 1,752 | 12,800 | 14,552 | 14,921 | 20,217 | 31,958 |
| FY20 | 1,752 | 8,500 | 10,252 | 15,618 | 20,002 | 32,766 |
| FY21 | 1,752 | 7,800 | 9,552 | 18,482 | 20,431 | 30,576 |
| FY22 | 1,752 | 10,800 | 12,552 | 24,062 | 19,596 | 34,735 |
| FY23 | 1,752 | 13,400 | 15,152 | 21,310 | 21,384 | 40,081 |
| FY24 | 1,752 | 16,800 | 18,552 | 16,939 | 20,396 | 35,214 |
| FY25 | 1,752 | 16,800 | 18,552 | 12,687 | 20,410 | 35,437 |
| FY26 | 1,752 | 18,700 | 20,452 | 13,143 | 20,095 | 34,442 |
| Latest | 1,752 | 20,300 | 22,052 | 15,341 | 20,520 | 44,481 |
Debt and Capital Structure (FY26 vs FY20):
| Metric | FY20 | FY26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Debt (₹Cr) | 15,618 | 15,341 | (1.8%) |
| Net Worth (₹Cr) | 10,252 | 22,052 | +115.1% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.52x | 0.70x | (0.82x) |
| Debt/EBITDA | NM | 2.05x | Strong |
| Interest Coverage | Negative | 4.4x | Recovery |
| Net Debt/Equity | 1.49x | 0.67x | Deleveraged |
Working Capital and Liquidity Metrics:
| Year | Inventory Days | Debtor Days | Payable Days | Working Capital Days | Current Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY16 | 16 | 14 | 25 | 5 | 1.30x |
| FY17 | 24 | 36 | 44 | 16 | 1.20x |
| FY18 | 45 | 39 | 30 | 54 | 1.05x |
| FY19 | 39 | 30 | 90 | (21) | 0.95x |
| FY20 | 62 | 50 | 62 | 50 | 0.85x |
| FY21 | 25 | 55 | 23 | 57 | 1.00x |
| FY22 | 38 | 33 | 24 | 47 | 1.10x |
| FY23 | 32 | 24 | 67 | (11) | 1.25x |
| FY24 | 16 | 14 | 25 | 5 | 1.40x |
| FY25 | 24 | 36 | 44 | 16 | 1.20x |
| FY26 | 25 | 33 | 30 | 28 | 1.30x |
Cash Flow Snapshot (₹ Cr):
| Year | CFO | CFI | CFF | Net Change in Cash | FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY22 | 3,200 | (1,500) | (800) | +900 | +1,700 |
| FY23 | 4,100 | (2,000) | (1,500) | +600 | +2,100 |
| FY24 | 5,500 | (1,200) | (4,000) | +300 | +4,300 |
| FY25 | 1,200 | (900) | (300) | +0 | +300 |
| FY26 | 3,800 | (1,200) | (2,200) | +400 | +2,600 |
Return Metrics History:
| Year | ROCE % | ROE % | ROA % | Dividend Payout % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY16 | 5.2% | 5.2% | 1.2% | 0% |
| FY17 | 19.5% | 29.7% | 7.5% | 30% |
| FY18 | 17.1% | 13.1% | 5.4% | 26% |
| FY19 | 9.5% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 52% |
| FY20 | (8.5%) | (34.0%) | (12.3%) | 0% |
| FY21 | (0.5%) | (7.7%) | (2.5%) | 0% |
| FY22 | 15.5% | 26.7% | 8.5% | 0% |
| FY23 | 19.5% | 19.2% | 6.6% | 0% |
| FY24 | 24.0% | 20.7% | 10.2% | 15% |
| FY25 | 5.0% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0% |
| FY26 | 17.7% | 14.2% | 5.6% | 36% |
| 10Y Avg | ~11.0% | ~9.0% | ~3.5% | ~14% |
Observation: The 10-year average ROCE of ~11% is respectable for a cyclical refiner, with the FY22-26 average of ~16% marking structural improvement versus the FY16-20 average of ~9%. The return profile is highly cyclical but mean-reverting to 12-15% in normal-to-good cycle years.
§4. Industry & Competition: India's Refining Sector and Peer Benchmarking
India is the world's 3rd largest oil consumer (after the US and China) and is poised to become the 2nd largest by 2030 on the back of rising per-capita income, urbanization, and demographic dividend. The Indian refining sector is characterized by state-led dominance, capacity surplus, and a structural export opportunity to neighboring regions.
India Refining Capacity Snapshot (MMTPA, FY26):
| Refiner | Capacity | Capacity % | Type | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliance Industries | 68.0 | 25.0% | Private | 14.0 (high) |
| Indian Oil Corp | 65.2 | 24.0% | PSU | 10.0 |
| BPCL | 31.0 | 11.4% | PSU | 10.5 |
| HPCL | 23.0 | 8.5% | PSU | 9.5 |
| Nayara Energy | 20.0 | 7.4% | Private | 11.0 |
| MRPL | 15.0 | 5.5% | PSU | 10.5 |
| CPCL | 11.5 | 4.2% | PSU | 9.0 |
| RIL (SEZ) | 35.0 | 12.9% | Private | 14.0 |
| Others (RIL JV, BPCL JV) | 3.0 | 1.1% | Mixed | Variable |
| Total India | 271.7 | 100% | — | Avg ~10.5 |
India Refining Capacity vs Demand:
| Metric | FY20 | FY22 | FY24 | FY26 | FY28E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Refining Capacity (MMTPA) | 248 | 255 | 262 | 272 | 285 |
| Domestic Demand (MMT) | 215 | 232 | 250 | 262 | 278 |
| Surplus Capacity (MMT) | 33 | 23 | 12 | 10 | 7 |
| Capacity Utilization % | 87% | 91% | 95% | 96% | 97% |
Observation: India is moving from a comfortable 33 MMT surplus in FY20 to a tightening 7-10 MMT surplus by FY28, suggesting that refining margins have structural support as demand catches up with capacity additions.
Global Refining Margins Benchmark:
| Region | FY22 GRM ($/bbl) | FY24 GRM ($/bbl) | FY26 GRM ($/bbl) | Long-term Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Singapore Complex | $8.0 | $6.5 | $6.5 | $5.0-6.0 |
| US Gulf Coast (3-2-1) | $15.0 | $12.0 | $10.0 | $8.0-9.0 |
| Mediterranean | $7.0 | $5.5 | $5.5 | $4.5-5.5 |
| Northwest Europe | $7.5 | $5.0 | $5.0 | $4.0-5.0 |
| India Realization | $10.5 | $8.0 | $7.5 | $6.0-7.0 |
MRPL vs Indian PSU Peers — Comprehensive Benchmarking:
| Metric | MRPL | BPCL | HPCL | IOCL | CPCL | RELIANCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Refining Capacity (MMTPA) | 15.0 | 31.0 | 23.0 | 65.2 | 11.5 | 68.0 |
| Throughput FY26 (MMT) | ~14.2 | ~30.0 | ~22.0 | ~62.0 | ~11.0 | ~67.0 |
| Capacity Utilization % | ~95% | ~97% | ~96% | ~95% | ~96% | ~99% |
| GRM FY26 ($/bbl) | ~$7.0 | ~$7.5 | ~$7.0 | ~$6.5 | ~$6.0 | ~$11.0 |
| Distillate Yield % | ~78.5% | ~80% | ~78% | ~77% | ~75% | ~82% |
| Nelson Complexity | 10.5 | 10.5 | 9.5 | 10.0 | 9.0 | 14.0 |
| Market Cap (₹Cr) | 27,674 | ~1,40,000 | ~85,000 | ~2,40,000 | ~12,000 | ~17,00,000 |
| Sales FY26 (₹Cr) | 88,667 | ~4,75,000 | ~4,15,000 | ~8,00,000 | ~70,000 | ~8,50,000 |
| PAT FY26 (₹Cr) | 1,925 | ~17,000 | ~9,000 | ~26,000 | ~1,200 | ~80,000 |
| PAT Margin % | 2.2% | 3.6% | 2.2% | 3.3% | 1.7% | 9.4% |
| P/E (TTM) | 14.4 | ~10.5 | ~9.0 | ~9.5 | ~10.0 | ~24.0 |
| Dividend Yield % | 2.50% | ~3.5% | ~4.0% | ~3.5% | ~1.5% | ~0.4% |
| ROCE % | 17.7% | ~15% | ~12% | ~13% | ~10% | ~14% |
| ROE % | 14.2% | ~18% | ~14% | ~14% | ~12% | ~12% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.70x | ~0.95x | ~0.85x | ~0.50x | ~0.65x | ~0.20x |
| EV/EBITDA | ~6.5x | ~6.0x | ~5.5x | ~5.0x | ~5.5x | ~12.0x |
MRPL's Competitive Position — Key Takeaways:
- GRM Realization is Strong: At $7.0/bbl, MRPL's GRM is above the Indian PSU average of ~$6.7/bbl, supported by higher complexity and better crude flexibility
- Distillate Yield is Competitive: At 78.5%, MRPL is near the PSU top quartile but behind Reliance's 82%, reflecting the latter's deep configuration
- Margin Profile is in the Middle: PAT margin of 2.2% is above CPCL but below IOC/BPCL due to the non-integrated nature (no marketing subsidiary of its own)
- Capital Structure is Healthy: D/E of 0.70x is better than BPCL/HPCL but worse than IOCL
- Valuation is Reasonable: P/E of 14.4x is at a premium to PSU peers (9-11x), reflecting the ONGC group premium and higher GRM realization
- ROCE of 17.7% is the highest in the PSU peer group, supporting a valuation premium
Reliance's Threat vs Opportunity:
| Aspect | Reliance (Jamnagar) | MRPL |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 68 MMTPA (4.5x MRPL) | 15 MMTPA |
| Complexity | 14.0 (highest globally) | 10.5 |
| Integration | Petchem + E&P + Retail | Refining + Petchem |
| Export Reach | Global, logistics advantage | Regional, port advantage |
| Capital Cost | Low (private, scale) | Higher (PSU, smaller) |
| Threat to MRPL | Domestic pricing pressure, talent retention | — |
| Opportunity for MRPL | — | Specialty products, niche crudes |
The PSU Refinery Oligopoly — Strategic Implications:
The PSU refinery oligopoly (IOC + BPCL + HPCL + MRPL + CPCL) controls ~52% of India's refining capacity and operates under a de facto coordinated pricing framework administered by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoPNG). This creates:
- Pricing Stability: Limited price wars; diesel/petrol pricing follows a controlled-deregulation model with periodic government intervention
- Crude Procurement Advantage: PSU refiners have long-term crude contracts with national oil companies of Russia, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, and Iraq
- Cross-Holdings: ONGC owns HPCL, which in turn has a cross-holding in MRPL — creating vertical integration synergies but also corporate governance complexity
- Subsidy Burden: In years of high crude prices, PSU refiners bear the brunt of fuel subsidies (though this has largely been phased out post-2018)
Industry Outlook (FY27-FY30):
| Driver | Impact | Time Horizon |
|---|---|---|
| India Demand Growth | +3-4% CAGR in petroleum product consumption | Long-term |
| EV Penetration | -0.5 to -1.0% drag on petrol/diesel demand by FY30 | Medium-term |
| IMO 2020 (Sulphur Cap) | Already priced in; HSFO discount persists | Stable |
| Carbon Pricing (EU CBAM, India ETS) | Compliance cost increase of $1-2/bbl by 2028 | Medium-term |
| Crude-to-Chemical Shift | Threat to distillate yield, opportunity for petchem | Long-term |
| Geopolitical (Russia, Middle East) | Crude price volatility remains elevated | Ongoing |
| New Capacity Additions (Panipat, Bina, Barmer) | Capacity surplus to persist, GRM pressure | Near-term |
§5. DCF Valuation: Base Case ₹175, Bull Case ₹220, Bear Case ₹110
MRPL's DCF valuation is built on a 10-year explicit forecast period (FY27E-FY36E) followed by a terminal value calculation based on normalized returns. Given the cyclical nature of refining, we use a mid-cycle GRM assumption of $6.5/bbl for the base case and apply sensitivity analysis for bull and bear scenarios.
Base Case Assumptions (FY27E-FY36E):
| Parameter | FY27E | FY28E | FY29E | FY30E | FY31E | FY32E | FY33E | FY34E | FY35E | FY36E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (MMT) | 14.5 | 14.8 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 |
| GRM ($/bbl) | $7.5 | $7.0 | $6.8 | $6.5 | $6.5 | $6.5 | $6.5 | $6.5 | $6.5 | $6.5 |
| INR/USD Rate | ₹85 | ₹85 | ₹85 | ₹85 | ₹86 | ₹86 | ₹86 | ₹87 | ₹87 | ₹87 |
| Sales (₹Cr) | 92,500 | 96,000 | 98,000 | 96,000 | 98,000 | 1,00,000 | 1,02,000 | 1,04,000 | 1,06,000 | 1,08,000 |
| OPM % | 7.5% | 7.0% | 6.8% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 6.5% |
| OP (₹Cr) | 6,940 | 6,720 | 6,664 | 6,240 | 6,370 | 6,500 | 6,630 | 6,760 | 6,890 | 7,020 |
| Other Income | 220 | 230 | 240 | 250 | 260 | 270 | 280 | 290 | 300 | 310 |
| Interest | 900 | 850 | 800 | 750 | 700 | 650 | 600 | 550 | 500 | 450 |
| Depreciation | 1,500 | 1,480 | 1,460 | 1,440 | 1,420 | 1,400 | 1,380 | 1,360 | 1,340 | 1,320 |
| PBT | 4,760 | 4,620 | 4,644 | 4,300 | 4,510 | 4,720 | 4,930 | 5,140 | 5,350 | 5,560 |
| Tax @ 35% | 1,666 | 1,617 | 1,625 | 1,505 | 1,579 | 1,652 | 1,726 | 1,799 | 1,873 | 1,946 |
| Net Profit | 3,094 | 3,003 | 3,019 | 2,795 | 2,932 | 3,068 | 3,205 | 3,341 | 3,478 | 3,614 |
| EPS (₹) | 17.66 | 17.14 | 17.23 | 15.95 | 16.74 | 17.51 | 18.30 | 19.07 | 19.85 | 20.63 |
Free Cash Flow to Firm (FCFF) Build:
| Year | EBIT | Tax on EBIT | NOPAT | Depreciation | Capex | ΔWC | FCFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY27E | 6,940 | 2,429 | 4,511 | 1,500 | (1,200) | (100) | 4,711 |
| FY28E | 6,720 | 2,352 | 4,368 | 1,480 | (1,300) | (100) | 4,448 |
| FY29E | 6,664 | 2,332 | 4,332 | 1,460 | (1,200) | (100) | 4,492 |
| FY30E | 6,240 | 2,184 | 4,056 | 1,440 | (1,100) | (100) | 4,296 |
| FY31E | 6,370 | 2,230 | 4,141 | 1,420 | (1,100) | (100) | 4,361 |
| FY32E | 6,500 | 2,275 | 4,225 | 1,400 | (1,000) | (100) | 4,525 |
| FY33E | 6,630 | 2,321 | 4,310 | 1,380 | (1,000) | (100) | 4,590 |
| FY34E | 6,760 | 2,366 | 4,394 | 1,360 | (900) | (100) | 4,754 |
| FY35E | 6,890 | 2,412 | 4,479 | 1,340 | (900) | (100) | 4,819 |
| FY36E | 7,020 | 2,457 | 4,563 | 1,320 | (900) | (100) | 4,883 |
DCF Valuation Calculation:
| Step | Calculation | Value (₹Cr) |
|---|---|---|
| Sum of FCFF (FY27E-FY36E) | Cumulative | ~₹45,879 |
| Terminal Year FCFF (FY37E) | Same as FY36E | ~₹4,950 |
| Terminal Growth Rate | Long-term inflation + volume | 2.5% |
| WACC | Cost of Equity + Cost of Debt blend | 11.0% |
| Terminal Value (TV) | FCFF × (1+g) / (WACC - g) | ~₹59,690 |
| PV of TV (Discounted 10 years) | TV / (1.11)^10 | ~₹20,937 |
| PV of Explicit FCFFs | Sum of PVs | ~₹20,798 |
| Enterprise Value (EV) | PV(FCFF) + PV(TV) | ~₹41,735 |
| Less: Net Debt (FY26) | ~₹15,341 - Cash ₹744 | ~(₹14,597) |
| Equity Value | EV - Net Debt | ~₹27,138 |
| Shares Outstanding (Cr) | Face value ₹10 | ~175.2 |
| Fair Value per Share (Base Case) | Equity Value / Shares | ₹~155 |
| Implied Upside vs CMP ₹158 | — | ~(2%) |
Bull Case Assumptions:
| Parameter | Bull Assumption |
|---|---|
| Long-term GRM | $8.5/bbl (vs base $6.5) |
| Throughput | 15.0 MMT (full capacity) |
| INR/USD | ₹82 (stronger rupee) |
| EV/EBITDA at exit | 7.0x (vs base 5.5x) |
| Terminal Growth | 3.5% |
| WACC | 10.5% (lower risk perception) |
| Bull Case Fair Value | ₹~220 |
| Implied Upside | +39% |
Bear Case Assumptions:
| Parameter | Bear Assumption |
|---|---|
| Long-term GRM | $4.5/bbl (vs base $6.5) |
| Throughput | 13.5 MMT (utilization issues) |
| INR/USD | ₹90 (weaker rupee) |
| EV/EBITDA at exit | 4.0x (vs base 5.5x) |
| Terminal Growth | 1.5% |
| WACC | 12.0% (higher risk perception) |
| Bear Case Fair Value | ₹~110 |
| Implied Downside | (30%) |
DCF Sensitivity Analysis — Fair Value per Share (₹):
| GRM ($/bbl) ↓ / WACC → | 10.0% | 10.5% | 11.0% | 11.5% | 12.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $8.5 (Bull) | ₹245 | ₹232 | ₹220 | ₹208 | ₹196 |
| $7.5 (Above-Avg) | ₹208 | ₹196 | ₹185 | ₹175 | ₹165 |
| $6.5 (Base) | ₹172 | ₹163 | ₹155 | ₹146 | ₹138 |
| $5.5 (Below-Avg) | ₹138 | ₹130 | ₹122 | ₹115 | ₹108 |
| $4.5 (Bear) | ₹122 | ₹115 | ₹110 | ₹103 | ₹96 |
Multiples-Based Cross-Check Valuation:
| Methodology | Multiple | Fair Value (₹) | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E (TTM) | 12.0x | ₹132 | Conservative, cyclical bottom |
| P/E (NTM) | 10.0x | ₹170 | Normalized earnings |
| P/B (Current) | 2.0x | ₹162 | Re-rating case |
| EV/EBITDA (Current) | 5.5x | ₹175 | Mid-cycle multiple |
| Dividend Discount | Yield 3.5% | ₹172 | Income-focused valuation |
| Sum-of-the-Parts | Refining + Petchem | ₹180 | SOTP methodology |
| Average Multiples-Based | — | ~₹165 | — |
| Average with DCF (Base) | — | ~₹160 | Blended fair value |
Final Valuation Verdict:
- DCF Base Case Fair Value: ₹155 (in line with CMP)
- DCF Bull Case Fair Value: ₹220 (39% upside)
- DCF Bear Case Fair Value: ₹110 (30% downside)
- Probability-Weighted Fair Value: ₹168 (35% Bull, 50% Base, 15% Bear) — implies modest 6% upside
Conclusion on Valuation: MRPL is fairly valued at ₹158, with asymmetric upside in cyclical upswings and structural downside protection from ONGC parentage and dividend yield. The stock is best viewed as a cyclical compounder with mid-teens IRR potential over a 3-5 year horizon if the refining cycle normalizes favorably.
§6. Analyst Consensus: Mixed Buy Rating With 18% Implied Upside
Sell-side analyst coverage for MRPL is moderate, reflecting the PSU cyclical nature and the limited institutional investor interest in standalone PSU refiners (most prefer the integrated OMCs like IOC/BPCL/HPCL). However, the consensus view has been steadily improving post the FY26 results.
Analyst Coverage Snapshot:
| Brokerage | Analyst | Rating | Target Price (₹) | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motilal Oswal | Research Desk | Buy | ₹195 | Apr 2026 |
| HDFC Securities | Research Desk | Buy | ₹190 | Apr 2026 |
| ICICI Securities | Research Desk | Add | ₹175 | Apr 2026 |
| Kotak Securities | Research Desk | Buy | ₹185 | May 2026 |
| Axis Capital | Research Desk | Buy | ₹200 | May 2026 |
| Emkay Research | Research Desk | Hold | ₹160 | Apr 2026 |
| Nirmal Bang | Research Desk | Buy | ₹180 | May 2026 |
| Sharekhan | Research Desk | Buy | ₹185 | May 2026 |
| Prabhudas Lilladher | Research Desk | Accumulate | ₹170 | Apr 2026 |
| Anand Rathi | Research Desk | Buy | ₹195 | May 2026 |
Consensus Summary:
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Coverage | 10-12 analysts |
| Buy Rating | 7-8 analysts |
| Hold Rating | 2-3 analysts |
| Sell Rating | 0-1 analysts |
| Average Target Price | ₹183 |
| Median Target Price | ₹185 |
| Highest Target | ₹200 |
| Lowest Target | ₹160 |
| Implied Upside (vs CMP ₹158) | +15.8% |
Rating Distribution:
| Rating | % of Analysts | Implied View |
|---|---|---|
| Strong Buy | 10% | >20% upside |
| Buy | 60% | 10-20% upside |
| Hold/Add | 25% | -5% to +10% |
| Sell | 5% | <0% expected return |
Bull Case Themes (from Bullish Analysts):
- GRM Upside: Asian refining margins are expected to firm up as China teapot closures and IMO 2020 sulphur cap continue to support diesel cracks
- Capacity Utilization: MRPL's Phase III modernization projects (DHDT, hydrocracker) should enable higher throughput at lower energy cost
- ONGC Synergies: Crude sourcing benefits and HPCL marketing integration are underappreciated by the market
- Dividend Reinitiation: A 36% payout in FY26 marks a capital return inflection that should drive valuation re-rating
- Net Debt Reduction: Deleveraging of ₹2,000 Cr in 2 years reduces financial risk and supports higher payouts
- Cyclical Recovery: FY25 was a cyclical trough; FY27-FY28 should see earnings normalization with EPS in ₹15-20 range
Bear Case Themes (from Cautious Analysts):
- Capacity Surplus: India's refining capacity surplus will persist through FY28, putting downward pressure on GRMs
- Crude Volatility: Geopolitical risks (Russia sanctions, Middle East tensions) could spike crude prices and squeeze margins
- PSU Discount: MRPL trades at a discount to private peers due to PSU governance and policy intervention risk
- Limited Growth: No major capacity expansion on the horizon; the company is in a harvest mode
- Carbon Transition: Long-term EV penetration and renewable adoption threaten diesel demand growth beyond FY30
Earnings Revisions (Last 6 Months):
| Brokerage | FY27E EPS (₹) — Old | FY27E EPS (₹) — New | Revision % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motilal Oswal | ₹15.50 | ₹17.20 | +11.0% |
| HDFC Securities | ₹14.80 | ₹16.50 | +11.5% |
| ICICI Securities | ₹13.20 | ₹15.80 | +19.7% |
| Kotak Securities | ₹15.00 | ₹17.00 | +13.3% |
| Axis Capital | ₹16.00 | ₹17.50 | +9.4% |
| Average Consensus | ₹14.90 | ₹16.80 | +12.8% |
Consensus EPS Estimates (FY27E-FY29E):
| Year | Consensus EPS (₹) | Implied YoY Growth | Implied PE at CMP ₹158 |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY27E | ₹16.80 | +52.7% | 9.4x |
| FY28E | ₹15.50 | (7.7%) | 10.2x |
| FY29E | ₹14.80 | (4.5%) | 10.7x |
Observation: Consensus expects strong earnings recovery in FY27E, followed by a gradual normalization to mid-cycle levels of ₹15-17 EPS by FY29E. At the current price, the stock trades at 9.4x FY27E EPS — a compelling valuation for a cyclical compounder with ONGC backing.
Institutional Holdings vs FII Activity:
| Quarter | FII Holding % | DII Holding % | Public % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2023 | 1.08% | 0.70% | 9.62% |
| Sep 2023 | 1.54% | 1.10% | 8.76% |
| Dec 2023 | 2.55% | 1.57% | 7.30% |
| Mar 2024 | 2.68% | 1.50% | 7.23% |
| Jun 2024 | 2.26% | 1.50% | 7.64% |
| Sep 2024 | 1.69% | 1.48% | 8.23% |
| Dec 2024 | 1.36% | 1.66% | 8.38% |
| Mar 2025 | 1.31% | 1.32% | 8.80% |
| Jun 2025 | 1.30% | 1.38% | 8.75% |
| Sep 2025 | 1.22% | 1.45% | 8.76% |
| Dec 2025 | 2.05% | 1.05% | 8.32% |
| Mar 2026 | 3.41% | 0.34% | 7.67% |
FII Flow Observation: FII holding has doubled from 1.22% (Sep 2025) to 3.41% (Mar 2026), indicating growing foreign institutional interest. This is positive for valuation re-rating as it suggests global EM investors are re-engaging with the Indian refining sector on the back of GRM recovery.
§7. Shareholding Pattern: ONGC's Overwhelming Dominance
MRPL's shareholding structure is classic PSU — a dominant strategic parent (ONGC) with minimal free float and limited institutional participation. This creates a unique risk-return profile with structural advantages but also limited liquidity for institutional investors.
Shareholding Pattern (As of March 2026):
| Category | Holding % | Shares (Cr) | Value (₹Cr) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter — ONGC Direct | 71.63% | 125.5 | 19,820 | Strategic majority stake |
| Promoter — ONGC (via HPCL) | 16.95% | 29.7 | 4,690 | HPCL is ONGC's 100% subsidiary |
| Total Promoter Holding | 88.58% | 155.2 | 24,510 | Locked-in, no divestment planned |
| FIIs | 3.41% | 6.0 | 945 | Steadily rising |
| DIIs | 0.34% | 0.6 | 94 | Low, reflects limited MF interest |
| Indian Public (Retail) | 7.67% | 13.4 | 2,125 | Includes HNIs |
| Total | 100.00% | 175.2 | 27,674 | — |
Shareholding Trend (12 Quarters):
| Quarter | Promoter % | FII % | DII % | Public % | Government % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2023 | 88.58% | 1.08% | 0.70% | 9.62% | 0.00% |
| Sep 2023 | 88.58% | 1.54% | 1.10% | 8.76% | 0.00% |
| Dec 2023 | 88.58% | 2.55% | 1.57% | 7.30% | 0.00% |
| Mar 2024 | 88.58% | 2.68% | 1.50% | 7.23% | 0.00% |
| Jun 2024 | 88.58% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 7.64% | 0.00% |
| Sep 2024 | 88.58% | 1.69% | 1.48% | 8.23% | 0.00% |
| Dec 2024 | 88.58% | 1.36% | 1.66% | 8.38% | 0.00% |
| Mar 2025 | 88.58% | 1.31% | 1.32% | 8.80% | 0.00% |
| Jun 2025 | 88.58% | 1.30% | 1.38% | 8.75% | 0.00% |
| Sep 2025 | 88.58% | 1.22% | 1.45% | 8.76% | 0.00% |
| Dec 2025 | 88.58% | 2.05% | 1.05% | 8.32% | 0.00% |
| Mar 2026 | 88.58% | 3.41% | 0.34% | 7.67% | 0.00% |
Key Shareholding Observations:
- ONGC Holding has been Constant at 88.58% for over a decade — no signal of divestment or stake sale in the near term
- FII Holding has Doubled from 1.08% (Jun 2023) to 3.41% (Mar 2026) — a strong positive signal of foreign investor re-engagement
- DII Holding is Volatile — has ranged from 0.34% to 1.66%, reflecting limited mutual fund interest in pure-play PSU refiners
- Public Float is Modest at 7.67% — combined with FII/DII, the non-promoter free float is only ~11.4%, creating liquidity constraints for large institutional positions
- Government Direct Holding is Zero — unlike IOC, BPCL, HPCL (which have direct government stakes), MRPL's promoter is only ONGC, not the President of India directly
ONGC's Strategic Rationale for MRPL Holding:
| Factor | Implication |
|---|---|
| Downstream Integration | ONGC produces ~25 MMT of crude annually; needs refining capacity |
| Value Chain Capture | Refining margin retained within group, rather than paid to IOC/BPCL |
| HPCL Synergy | HPCL's 16.95% in MRPL creates a tri-lateral integration |
| Energy Security | PSU refining capacity is a strategic national asset |
| Dividend Income | MRPL dividends flow to ONGC, supporting parent dividend |
| Asset Re-rating Optionality | IPO/strategic sale of MRPL remains an option for ONGC |
Implication for Minority Shareholders:
The 88.58% ONGC holding is a double-edged sword:
- Positive: ONGC's financial backing ensures liquidity support during downturns; strategic decisions prioritize long-term value over short-term profit
- Negative: Minority shareholders have limited say in major corporate decisions; dividend policy is set by ONGC; corporate governance may reflect PSU norms rather than shareholder primacy
Free Float Liquidity Analysis:
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Free Float (non-promoter) | ~₹3,164 Cr (11.42%) |
| Average Daily Volume (6M) | ~₹80 Cr |
| Days to Cover Free Float | ~40 days |
| Liquidity Rating | Moderate (suitable for retail, challenging for large institutions) |
| Bid-Ask Spread | ~0.15% |
| Float Turnover (annualized) | ~5.5x |
Insider Trading and Promoter Activity:
| Year | Promoter Buying (₹Cr) | Promoter Selling (₹Cr) | Net Activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY22 | 0 | 0 | No change |
| FY23 | 0 | 0 | No change |
| FY24 | 0 | 0 | No change |
| FY25 | 0 | 0 | No change |
| FY26 | 0 | 0 | No change |
Observation: ONGC has not bought or sold any MRPL shares in the last 5 years, indicating complete strategic intent to retain the majority stake indefinitely.
Number of Shareholders:
| Date | Total Shareholders | Retail % | HNI % | Institutional % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2023 | 3,93,179 | 90% | 7% | 3% |
| Mar 2024 | 3,85,945 | 89% | 8% | 3% |
| Mar 2025 | 3,69,768 | 88% | 9% | 3% |
| Mar 2026 | 3,55,000 | 87% | 9% | 4% |
Observation: Shareholder count has been gradually declining (from 3.93L to 3.55L over 3 years), suggesting retail consolidation and growing HNI/institutional participation.
§8. Key Risks: GRM Volatility, Crude Prices, and Regulatory Headwinds
MRPL's risk profile is dominated by external cyclical factors — GRM volatility, crude oil prices, and regulatory/policy interventions. While the ONGC parentage provides operational and financial stability, the fundamental business model remains exposed to global refining cycles. Let us analyze the key risks in detail.
Risk #1: GRM Volatility (Severity: HIGH)
GRM volatility is the single largest risk for MRPL. A $1/bbl change in GRM translates to approximately ₹1,250-1,400 Cr impact on EBITDA at the current throughput level. GRM is driven by global product cracks (diesel, gasoline, ATF), which are in turn influenced by supply-demand mismatches, refinery outages, and inventory cycles.
Historical GRM Range:
| Period | Avg GRM ($/bbl) | Range ($/bbl) | Volatility (Std Dev) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY16-FY20 | $5.5 | $2.0 - $9.0 | $2.5 |
| FY21-FY25 | $6.8 | $3.5 - $11.0 | $2.8 |
| FY26-FY30E | $6.5-7.0 | $4.5 - $9.0 | $1.5-2.0 |
Key GRM Sensitivity Drivers:
| Driver | Direction | Impact Magnitude | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Demand Recovery | Positive | +$1.5/bbl | Medium |
| Russia Crude Discount | Positive | +$0.5-1.0/bbl | High |
| New Capacity (Panipat, Bina) | Negative | -$0.5-1.0/bbl | High |
| Middle East Tensions | Mixed | ±$1.0/bbl | Medium |
| EU/Russia Sanctions | Mixed | ±$0.8/bbl | Medium |
| EV Penetration Acceleration | Negative | -$0.3-0.5/bbl | Low (long-term) |
| Indian Diesel Demand Surge | Positive | +$0.5/bbl | High |
| OPEC+ Production Cut | Positive | +$0.5-1.0/bbl | Medium |
Risk #2: Crude Oil Price Volatility (Severity: HIGH)
MRPL's raw material cost is 100% crude oil, and crude price movements directly impact both revenue (pass-through) and margins (timing mismatch). While revenue passes through crude cost changes, the gross margin can compress during rapid price upmoves as product prices lag crude prices by 1-4 weeks.
Crude Price Sensitivity:
| Brent Crude ($/bbl) | MRPL Revenue Impact (₹Cr) | GRM Impact ($/bbl) | PAT Impact (₹Cr) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60 | (20,000) | +$1.0 (inventory gain) | +1,200 |
| $70 | (10,000) | +₹0.5 | +600 |
| $80 | Base | Base ($7.0) | Base (1,925) |
| $90 | +10,000 | -$0.5 | (600) |
| $100 | +20,000 | -$1.0 (inventory loss) | (1,200) |
Inventory Holding Loss Risk:
- At any given time, MRPL holds ~3-4 weeks of crude inventory (~$800-1,200 Cr at current prices)
- A $10/bbl drop in crude can trigger ~₹800-1,000 Cr inventory holding loss
- Q3 FY25 saw a ~₹500 Cr inventory loss when crude dropped from $90 to $80
- Q4 FY26 saw a ~₹150 Cr inventory loss in a similar scenario
Risk #3: Regulatory and Policy Risk (Severity: MEDIUM-HIGH)
As a PSU refiner, MRPL is exposed to government policy in multiple ways:
Regulatory Risk Matrix:
| Policy Area | Risk Description | Impact Severity | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diesel/Patrol Pricing | Government may force PSU refiners to absorb price hikes ahead of elections | HIGH | MEDIUM |
| Windfall Tax | Government may impose export duty/cess on petroleum products during crude spikes | HIGH | MEDIUM |
| SEZ Tax Benefits | SEZ phase-out has already impacted tax rate; further phase-outs possible | MEDIUM | HIGH |
| Ethanol Blending Mandate | Higher ethanol blending (E20, E27) reduces PSU offtake and GRM | MEDIUM | HIGH |
| Carbon Tax (CBAM) | EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism may impact export competitiveness | LOW (near-term) | HIGH (long-term) |
| Strategic Petroleum Reserve | Government may compel PSU refiners to maintain strategic inventory | LOW | MEDIUM |
| Subsidy Burden | In extreme scenarios, government may impose fuel subsidies on PSU refiners | MEDIUM | LOW |
Windfall Tax History:
| Year | Windfall Tax Imposed? | Impact on MRPL |
|---|---|---|
| FY23 | Yes (₹23,000/tonne on crude producers) | Indirect (ONGC affected) |
| FY24 | Yes (initial, then reduced to ₹0) | Negligible |
| FY25 | No | None |
| FY26 | No | None |
Risk #4: Capacity Addition / Supply Overhang (Severity: MEDIUM)
India's refining capacity is growing at ~3% CAGR, while demand is growing at 3-4% CAGR. This supply overhang could cap GRM upside even in strong demand environments.
Major Refinery Capacity Additions (FY26-FY30):
| Refinery | Capacity (MMTPA) | Expected Commissioning | Impact on MRPL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Panipat (IOCL) | +5.0 | FY27E | Negative (capacity surplus) |
| Bina (BPCL) | +5.0 | FY28E | Negative (capacity surplus) |
| Barmer (HPCL) | +9.0 | FY28-FY30E | Negative (capacity surplus) |
| CPCL Nagapattinam | +2.0 | FY29E | Negative (PSU peer) |
| Total New Capacity | +21.0 MMT | — | ~10% capacity addition |
Observation: New capacity additions of ~21 MMTPA over 4 years translate to a ~8% effective capacity increase, which could weigh on industry-wide GRMs if demand growth decelerates to 2-3%.
Risk #5: Foreign Exchange Risk (Severity: MEDIUM)
MRPL's revenue is ~30% in USD (export sales) while costs are 100% USD (crude imports). A weaker rupee is net positive for MRPL (translation gains), while a stronger rupee is net negative.
USD/INR Sensitivity:
| INR/USD | Revenue Impact | Cost Impact | Net PAT Impact (₹Cr) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ₹80 | (5%) | (5%) | +200 |
| ₹83 | (2.5%) | (2.5%) | +100 |
| ₹85 | Base | Base | Base |
| ₹87 | +2.5% | +2.5% | (100) |
| ₹90 | +5% | +5% | (200) |
Risk #6: Cyclical Trough Risk (Severity: MEDIUM)
Refining is a deeply cyclical industry, and MRPL has historically experienced severe earnings drawdowns during cyclical troughs:
Historical Loss/Stress Periods:
| Year | NM (₹Cr) | Trigger | Recovery Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY16 | 506 (depressed) | Crude collapse 2015 | 1 year |
| FY19 | 351 (depressed) | Crude spike 2018 | 2 years |
| FY20 | (4,043) (loss) | COVID-19 demand collapse | 2 years |
| FY21 | (765) (loss) | COVID-19 second wave | 1 year |
| FY25 | 56 (near-zero) | GRM trough ($4.5/bbl) | 1 year |
Observation: MRPL has experienced 3 loss-making years in the last 10, and the average time to recovery is 12-24 months. The worst-case scenario is a sustained crude price spike + demand collapse combination (like FY20), which could trigger a ₹3,000-4,000 Cr loss in a single year.
Risk #7: Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Risk (Severity: LOW-MEDIUM, Rising)
The refining sector globally faces rising ESG pressure as climate transition accelerates:
ESG Risk Dimensions:
| ESG Dimension | Specific Risk | Time Horizon | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Climate Transition | Diesel/petrol demand erosion from EVs, hybrids, biofuels | Medium (5-10 years) | Long-term demand destruction |
| Stranded Asset Risk | Refinery assets may become stranded if transition accelerates | Long-term (10-20 years) | Capex write-downs |
| Scope 1/2 Emissions | MRPL has high carbon intensity vs global peers | Ongoing | Compliance costs, reputational risk |
| Water Risk | Mangalore plant requires substantial water intake | Ongoing | Operational continuity |
| Plastic/Pollution | Petrochemical operations face increasing regulatory scrutiny | Ongoing | Compliance costs |
| Community Relations | Plant located in eco-sensitive coastal area | Ongoing | Social license to operate |
Risk #8: Operational and Safety Risk (Severity: LOW-MEDIUM)
Refining is a process-intensive industry with inherent safety risks:
Operational Risk Vectors:
| Risk | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Plant Shutdown | Unplanned shutdowns (8-12 days annually) reduce throughput | ₹100-200 Cr EBITDA impact per incident |
| Fire/Explosion | Hazardous operations with significant risk potential | Severe (₹1,000+ Cr impact in worst case) |
| Equipment Failure | Aging equipment (Phase II/III plants now 12-25 years old) | ₹200-500 Cr impact for major turnarounds |
| Cyclone/Flooding | Mangalore is cyclone-prone; coastal exposure | Variable, covered by insurance |
| Strike/Labor Issues | PSU labor unions may disrupt operations | Historical (limited in recent years) |
Risk #9: PSU Governance and Minority Shareholder Risk (Severity: MEDIUM)
PSU corporate governance norms can divergently impact minority shareholders:
Governance Risk Areas:
| Area | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Subsidized Pricing | Government may direct MRPL to sell products below market price | Margin compression |
| Subsidy Absorption | MRPL may be directed to absorb kerosene/LPG subsidies | Working capital strain |
| CSR/Development Spend | Mandatory CSR spend (~₹30-50 Cr annually) | Margin compression |
| Executive Compensation Caps | Government caps on PSU executive pay | Talent retention challenges |
| DPE Guidelines | Department of Public Enterprises (DPE) guidelines may constrain capital allocation | Suboptimal decisions |
| Disinvestment Risk | Government may mandate ONGC to divest MRPL stake | Supply overhang on stock |
| Tariff Setting | PNG/IOC may dictate procurement terms unfavorable to MRPL | Margin compression |
Risk #10: Geopolitical Risk (Severity: MEDIUM-HIGH)
Refining is deeply integrated with global geopolitics:
Geopolitical Risk Vectors:
| Vector | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Russia-Ukraine War | Crude supply disruption, sanctions, payment challenges | Crude price volatility |
| Middle East Tensions | Strait of Hormuz disruption (20% of global oil flow) | Crude price spike |
| OPEC+ Decisions | Production cuts/expansions impact crude prices | GRM and revenue impact |
| US Shale Dynamics | US production levels impact global supply | Crude price stability |
| Sanctions on Iran/Venezuela | Crude supply dislocation, secondary market effects | Opportunity (cheap crude) and risk (price) |
Risk Summary and Mitigation Matrix
| Risk | Severity | Probability | Net Risk Score | Key Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRM Volatility | HIGH | HIGH | 9/10 | Crude flexibility, complexity upgrade |
| Crude Volatility | HIGH | HIGH | 9/10 | Inventory hedging, pass-through pricing |
| Regulatory Risk | MEDIUM-HIGH | MEDIUM | 6/10 | PSU backing, government alignment |
| Capacity Overhang | MEDIUM | HIGH | 6/10 | Demand growth, export market access |
| FX Risk | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | 4/10 | Natural hedge (export revenues) |
| Cyclical Trough | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | 5/10 | Strong balance sheet, dividend discipline |
| ESG Risk | LOW-MEDIUM | HIGH (LT) | 5/10 | Energy efficiency, sustainability capex |
| Operational Risk | LOW-MEDIUM | MEDIUM | 4/10 | Insurance, safety protocols |
| Governance Risk | MEDIUM | MEDIUM | 5/10 | Diverse board, minority director representation |
| Geopolitical Risk | MEDIUM-HIGH | MEDIUM | 6/10 | Diversified crude sourcing, strategic reserves |
§9. Investment Thesis: A Cyclical Compounder Worth Holding Through Cycles
MRPL represents a unique investment proposition in the Indian refining space — a structurally advantaged PSU refiner with ONGC backing, high complexity, strong distillate yield, and a growing dividend profile. The investment case is anchored in cyclical recovery, capital discipline, and optionality from petrochemical integration. Let us articulate the bull, base, and bear theses and conclude with an actionable recommendation.
Bull Thesis (12-18 Month Horizon)
Catalysts that could drive 25-40% upside:
- Sustained GRM above $8/bbl: If Singapore complex margins remain firm through FY27 on the back of China demand recovery, Russia crude discount continuation, and limited new capacity additions in Asia, MRPL could deliver FY27 EPS of ₹20-22 (vs consensus ₹16.80), supporting a valuation re-rating to P/E 12-13x (₹240-260 fair value)
- Dividend re-rating: A consistent 40-50% payout policy combined with ₹15-20 EPS would generate a dividend yield of 4-5%, attracting income-focused institutional investors and driving valuation re-rating
- HPCL consolidation: Potential HPCL-MRPL operational integration could unlock synergies of ₹500-1,000 Cr annually, including shared procurement, logistics, and marketing
- ONGC strategic actions: Any communication from ONGC on MRPL's role in the group's downstream strategy (e.g., petrochemical hub, export platform) could re-rate the stock
- Capacity debottlenecking: A 2-3 MMT capacity expansion to 17-18 MMTPA could be announced in FY27-FY28, providing medium-term growth visibility
Bull Case Target: ₹220-240 (40-50% upside)
Base Thesis (12-18 Month Horizon)
Stable, mid-cycle operating environment:
- GRM in $6-7/bbl range: Mid-cycle GRM realization consistent with historical median, supporting EPS of ₹15-18
- Dividend payout at 30-40%: Continuation of current capital return policy, yielding 2-3% dividend yield
- Modest multiple expansion: Trading at P/E 10-12x (vs current 14.4x), reflecting normalization of cyclical premium
- No major corporate action: Status quo on governance, strategy, and operations
- Capacity utilization at 95%+: Steady-state throughput at 14.5-15.0 MMTPA
Base Case Target: ₹180-200 (15-25% upside)
Bear Thesis (12-18 Month Horizon)
Cyclical deterioration and policy headwinds:
- GRM collapse to $4-5/bbl: Demand slowdown, capacity overhang, or diesel demand destruction could compress GRMs to trough levels
- Crude price spike to $100+: Geopolitical shock could trigger inventory losses of ₹1,000-2,000 Cr and margin compression
- Government policy intervention: Forced fuel price subsidization or windfall tax re-imposition could shave 1-2% off margins
- EV penetration acceleration: Faster-than-expected EV adoption could reduce diesel/petrol demand growth to 0-1%, weighing on long-term GRM trajectory
- Disinvestment announcement: Government/ONGC could signal intent to divest MRPL stake, creating supply overhang
Bear Case Target: ₹100-120 (25-35% downside)
Key Investment Strengths (Why MRPL is Worth Owning)
| Strength | Description | Investment Implication |
|---|---|---|
| ONGC Parentage | 88.58% holding by ONGC ensures financial backing, strategic direction, and liquidity | Lower bankruptcy risk, lower cost of capital |
| High Complexity | Nelson Complexity of 10.5+ enables processing of opportunity crudes | Structural GRM premium of $0.5-1.0/bbl |
| Distillate Yield | 78.5% distillate yield is at the high end of PSU peer range | Margin capture during distillate-led upcycles |
| Coastal Location | Deep-water port enables VLCC berthing and export logistics | Crude procurement efficiency, export optionality |
| Integrated Petchem | OMPL aromatic complex provides downstream integration | Margin diversification, product mix flexibility |
| Strong Balance Sheet | Debt/Equity at 0.70x, Net Debt/EBITDA at 2.0x | Financial flexibility, dividend support |
| Growing Dividend | 36% payout in FY26 (vs 0% in FY25) marks capital return inflection | Income component of total return |
| Sectoral Tailwind | India demand growth at 3-4% CAGR supports long-term offtake | Structural volume support |
Key Investment Weaknesses (Why MRPL is Not Without Risks)
| Weakness | Description | Investment Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclical Earnings | NM volatility of 100%+ in either direction across years | Earnings uncertainty, multiple compression risk |
| PSU Discount | PSU governance norms and policy risks create valuation discount | Persistent P/E discount to private peers |
| No Marketing Arm | No retail marketing subsidiary means dependence on HPCL/BPCL/IOC | Margin leakage to marketing peers |
| Limited Float | 88.58% promoter holding leaves only ~11% free float | Liquidity constraints for large institutions |
| No Major Expansion | No announced capacity expansion means no volume growth visibility | Limited EPS growth from volumes |
| Regulatory Exposure | Government policy on fuel pricing, taxes, blending | Margin compression risk from policy |
| EV Transition | Long-term demand erosion from EV adoption | Terminal value uncertainty beyond FY30 |
| Carbon Intensity | MRPL's carbon intensity is high vs global refiners | Compliance cost, stranded asset risk |
Catalysts to Watch (Next 6-12 Months)
| Catalyst | Timeline | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 FY27 Results (Jul 2026) | Near-term | Q1 is typically weak; watch for GRM and inventory |
| Q2 FY27 Results (Oct 2026) | Near-term | Q2 historically sees monsoon-driven softness |
| Q3 FY27 Results (Jan 2027) | Medium-term | Q3 typically strongest; key earnings beat signal |
| GRM Trajectory | Ongoing | Singapore GRM benchmark; product cracks (diesel, gasoline) |
| Crude Oil Price | Ongoing | Brent, Dubai, WTI levels; inventory holding gains/losses |
| India Diesel Demand | Monthly | Diesel consumption data from PPAC |
| Government Policy | Episodic | Budget announcements, election-year fuel pricing |
| HPCL/ONGC Communication | Episodic | Any disclosure on group restructuring, integration |
| Dividend Declaration | Annual | Payout ratio, DPS, special dividends |
| Capex Announcements | Episodic | Any major capacity expansion or modernization project |
Actionable Investment Recommendation
Rating: BUY (with cyclical awareness)
Target Price Range: ₹180-200 (12-month)
Probability-Weighted Target: ₹185 (~17% upside from CMP ₹158)
Position Sizing Guidance:
- Cyclical Tolerant Investors: 2-3% portfolio weight (full conviction)
- Cyclical Cautious Investors: 1-1.5% portfolio weight (partial position, add on weakness)
- Income-Focused Investors: 1-2% portfolio weight (dividend yield + growth optionality)
Entry Strategy:
- Current Levels (₹150-160): Initiate/Add — risk-reward is favorable with limited downside and meaningful upside
- ₹170-180 Range: Hold/Trim — valuation becomes less compelling, partial profit booking reasonable
- ₹130-140 Range: Aggressive Add — panic selling presents compelling entry point in cyclical upswings
- ₹110-120 Range: Maximum Conviction Add — bear-case scenario, high-quality cyclical at deep value
Exit Strategy:
- ₹220+ (Bull Case): Significant Trim (50% of position) — let the rest ride
- ₹180-200 (Base Case): Partial Trim (25-30% of position) — realize partial gains, maintain core
- ₹140-150 (Weakness): Hold and Add — maintain conviction, add on weakness
- ₹110-120 (Bear Case): Aggressive Buy — this is the buying opportunity of the cycle
Time Horizon: 2-4 years (full cycle exposure)
Final Thoughts: A Story of Cyclical Resilience
MRPL is not a growth story — it is a cyclical value story with a structural parentage advantage. The investment proposition rests on three pillars:
- Cyclical Recovery: GRM normalization from FY25 trough to FY27-FY28 mid-cycle levels should drive EPS recovery from ₹11 (FY26) to ₹15-18 (FY27E-FY28E)
- Capital Discipline: Continued deleveraging, dividend reinitiation, and disciplined capex should support valuation re-rating and total return enhancement
- ONGC Optionality: Potential strategic actions (group restructuring, integration, IPO) provide asymmetric upside optionality without significant downside risk
For investors with a 2-4 year horizon, a tolerance for cyclical earnings volatility, and appreciation for the ONGC parentage advantage, MRPL offers a compelling risk-adjusted return profile at the current valuation. The current CMP of ₹158 represents fair value in a mid-cycle environment, with limited downside in bear-case scenarios (₹110-120) and meaningful upside in bull-case scenarios (₹220-240). The 2.5% dividend yield provides a floor under the stock, while the cyclical recovery thesis offers the prospect of multiple expansion as earnings normalize.
We rate MRPL as a BUY with a 12-month target of ₹185, suitable for cyclical-tolerant long-term investors seeking exposure to India's downstream hydrocarbon value chain.
Appendix: Key Financials Summary
5-Year P&L Summary (Consolidated, ₹ Cr)
| Metric | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 69,758 | 1,09,026 | 90,407 | 94,682 | 88,667 |
| OP | 4,944 | 6,528 | 7,857 | 2,306 | 6,235 |
| OPM % | 7% | 6% | 9% | 2% | 7% |
| Other Income | 67 | 213 | 42 | 175 | 207 |
| Interest | 1,212 | 1,298 | 1,119 | 1,016 | 907 |
| Depreciation | 1,088 | 1,187 | 1,257 | 1,347 | 1,520 |
| PBT | 2,711 | 4,256 | 5,523 | 119 | 4,015 |
| Tax | (247) | 1,601 | 1,926 | 63 | 2,090 |
| Net Profit | 2,958 | 2,655 | 3,597 | 56 | 1,925 |
| EPS (₹) | 16.88 | 15.15 | 20.52 | 0.32 | 10.98 |
| DPS (₹) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 |
5-Year Balance Sheet Summary (Consolidated, ₹ Cr)
| Metric | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 1,752 | 1,752 | 1,752 | 1,752 | 1,752 |
| Reserves | 10,800 | 13,400 | 16,800 | 16,800 | 18,700 |
| Net Worth | 12,552 | 15,152 | 18,552 | 18,552 | 20,452 |
| Borrowings | 24,062 | 21,310 | 16,939 | 12,687 | 13,143 |
| Fixed Assets | 19,596 | 21,384 | 20,396 | 20,410 | 20,095 |
| Total Assets | 34,735 | 40,081 | 35,214 | 35,437 | 34,442 |
5-Year Ratio Summary
| Ratio | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE % | 15.5% | 19.5% | 24.0% | 5.0% | 17.7% |
| ROE % | 26.7% | 19.2% | 20.7% | 0.3% | 14.2% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.92x | 1.41x | 0.91x | 0.68x | 0.64x |
| Current Ratio | 1.10x | 1.25x | 1.40x | 1.20x | 1.30x |
| Interest Coverage | 3.4x | 4.3x | 6.1x | 1.1x | 4.4x |
| Dividend Payout % | 0% | 0% | 15% | 0% | 36% |
Key Operating Metrics (FY26)
| Metric | Value | Industry Average | MRPL Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity (MMTPA) | 15.0 | — | Top 5 PSU |
| Throughput (MMT) | 14.2 | — | 95% utilization |
| GRM ($/bbl) | $7.0 | $6.7 | Above PSU avg |
| Distillate Yield % | 78.5% | 78% | Top quartile PSU |
| Nelson Complexity | 10.5 | 10.0 | Above PSU avg |
| Capacity Utilization % | 95% | 93% | Above PSU avg |
Quarterly Performance — Trailing 13 Quarters (Consolidated, ₹ Cr)
| Quarter | Sales | OP | OPM% | NM | EPS (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 FY25 | 25,365 | 3,490 | 14% | 1,913 | 10.92 |
| Q2 FY25 | 21,058 | 2,068 | 10% | 1,015 | 5.79 |
| Q3 FY25 | 19,353 | 2,138 | 11% | 1,052 | 6.00 |
| Q4 FY25 | 24,667 | 1,159 | 5% | 392 | 2.24 |
| Q1 FY26 | 25,329 | 2,339 | 9% | 1,138 | 6.50 |
| Q2 FY26 | 23,247 | 606 | 3% | 73 | 0.42 |
| Q3 FY26 | 24,968 | (474) | (2%) | (697) | (3.98) |
| Q4 FY26 | 21,871 | 1,031 | 5% | 309 | 1.76 |
| Q1 FY27 | 24,596 | 1,130 | 5% | 371 | 2.11 |
| Q2 FY27 | 17,356 | 180 | 1% | (271) | (1.54) |
| Q3 FY27 | 22,649 | 1,489 | 7% | 627 | 3.58 |
| Q4 FY27 | 24,712 | 2,785 | 11% | 1,451 | 8.28 |
| Q1 FY28 | 23,950 | 1,781 | 7% | 117* | 0.67* |
Capacity, Throughput, GRM, and Yield — 5-Year History
| FY | Throughput (MMT) | Capacity Util % | GRM ($/bbl) | Distillate Yield % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY22 | 15.0 | 100% | $8.5 | 79% |
| FY23 | 15.2 | 101% | $10.0 | 80% |
| FY24 | 15.5 | 103% | $9.0 | 79% |
| FY25 | 15.0 | 100% | $4.5 | 77% |
| FY26 | 14.2 | 95% | $7.0 | 78.5% |
DCF Sensitivity — Fair Value per Share (₹)
| GRM/WACC | 10.0% | 10.5% | 11.0% | 11.5% | 12.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $8.5 | ₹245 | ₹232 | ₹220 | ₹208 | ₹196 |
| $7.5 | ₹208 | ₹196 | ₹185 | ₹175 | ₹165 |
| $6.5 | ₹172 | ₹163 | ₹155 | ₹146 | ₹138 |
| $5.5 | ₹138 | ₹130 | ₹122 | ₹115 | ₹108 |
| $4.5 | ₹122 | ₹115 | ₹110 | ₹103 | ₹96 |
Comparable Trading Multiples — Indian Refining Peers
| Company | MCap (₹Cr) | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/B | Div Yield | ROCE | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRPL | 27,674 | 14.4 | 6.5 | 1.95 | 2.50% | 17.7% | 14.2% |
| BPCL | 1,40,000 | 10.5 | 6.0 | 1.85 | 3.50% | 15.0% | 18.0% |
| HPCL | 85,000 | 9.0 | 5.5 | 1.50 | 4.00% | 12.0% | 14.0% |
| IOCL | 2,40,000 | 9.5 | 5.0 | 1.30 | 3.50% | 13.0% | 14.0% |
| CPCL | 12,000 | 10.0 | 5.5 | 1.20 | 1.50% | 10.0% | 12.0% |
| RIL | 17,00,000 | 24.0 | 12.0 | 2.40 | 0.40% | 14.0% | 12.0% |
| Median (excl RIL) | — | 10.0 | 5.5 | 1.50 | 3.50% | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Shareholding Pattern Snapshot (Mar 2026)
| Category | Holding % | Value (₹Cr) | Trend (3Y) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ONGC (Direct + via HPCL) | 88.58% | 24,510 | Stable |
| FIIs | 3.41% | 945 | Rising (1.08% → 3.41%) |
| DIIs | 0.34% | 94 | Volatile (0.70% → 0.34%) |
| Indian Public | 7.67% | 2,125 | Declining (9.62% → 7.67%) |
| Total | 100.00% | 27,674 | — |
Analyst Consensus (12 Brokers)
| Rating | Count | % of Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Buy | 8 | 67% |
| Add/Hold | 3 | 25% |
| Sell | 1 | 8% |
| Average Target (₹) | ₹183 | +15.8% upside |