Back to Exploring

Sammaan Capital Ltd: A Strained Mortgage Lender at a Crossroads — Re-Rating Story or Value Trap?

company
By NiftyBrief Research TeamJune 13, 202624 min read

Sammaan Capital Ltd: A Strained Mortgage Lender at a Crossroads — Re-Rating Story or Value Trap?

NSE: SAMMAANCAP | BSE: 544078 | Sector: Financial Services | CMP: ₹174.35 | Market Cap: ₹20,204.65 Cr


1. Business Overview

Sammaan Capital Ltd (formerly Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited) is one of India's largest pure-play housing finance companies, having recently completed a strategic rebranding that marks a deliberate break from its embattled past. Listed on both the NSE and BSE under the ticker SAMMAANCAP, the company operates in the NBFC-HFC (Non-Banking Financial Company – Housing Finance Company) classification, with a face value of ₹2.0 per share and ISIN INE0O5601014. As of the latest close, the stock trades at ₹174.35, giving the company a market capitalisation of approximately ₹20,204.65 Cr, placing it firmly in the mid-cap segment of India's financial services universe.

The company's core business revolves around providing mortgage loans to retail and commercial borrowers, with a primary focus on the affordable and mid-income housing segments. The loan book is broadly diversified across home loans, loan against property (LAP), commercial real estate (CRE), and corporate mortgage finance, with a strategic tilt toward secured retail assets. Sammaan Capital's distribution footprint spans over 200 branches across India, with meaningful concentration in metropolitan and Tier-1 cities including Mumbai, Delhi-NCR, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Pune, and Ahmedabad, alongside a growing presence in Tier-2 markets.

The rebrand from Indiabulls Housing Finance to Sammaan Capital was not merely cosmetic. It signalled a clean break from the controversies surrounding the original promoter, Sameer Gehlaut, and his association with the now-disgraced Cayman Islands-registered Indiabulls Group entities. The new identity, helmed by the recently acquired majority shareholder Blackstone Inc. — which took control of the company following a deeply discounted rights issue — represents one of the most significant private equity interventions in the Indian NBFC space in recent memory. The capital infusion, the leadership overhaul, and the rebranding are all part of an orchestrated attempt to reposition the franchise as a professionally-managed, institutionally-owned mortgage lender.

In terms of asset size, the company manages an AUM (assets under management) in the range of ₹60,000–65,000 Cr, with the on-book loan book estimated at ₹50,000–55,000 Cr. The balance sheet is a hybrid model, with a meaningful share of loans directly on the books (with the residual in co-lending and assigned pools). The borrowings mix is dominated by secured NCDs (non-convertible debentures), bank term loans, NHB (National Housing Bank) refinance, and ECBs (external commercial borrowings). Given the housing finance classification, the company benefits from a lower risk weight on certain categories of housing loans and access to NHB's refinance window.

Operationally, Sammaan Capital is in transition. Under Blackstone's stewardship, the company has been aggressively cleaning up its legacy book, accelerating write-offs of stressed assets, and refocusing its origination engine on prime, salaried home loan customers. The secured book now constitutes the bulk of disbursements, with the company having consciously stepped away from riskier construction finance and developer loan exposures that weighed on the predecessor entity. The asset quality normalisation, while painful in the near term, is intended to lay the foundation for a healthier, more sustainable franchise that can command a higher multiple once profitability returns.

The Blackstone Strategic Playbook

Blackstone's entry into Sammaan Capital is best understood through the lens of the firm's broader India strategy. Blackstone has committed over $50 billion in capital across India over the past decade, with the bulk deployed in real estate, private equity, and now, selectively, in financial services. The Sammaan Capital investment represents a contrarian, contrarian-value play — the firm is buying a franchise that is operationally challenged but structurally sound, at a price that bakes in a significant discount to book value. The strategic logic rests on four pillars: (a) cleaning up legacy asset quality, (b) rebuilding the retail distribution network, (c) optimising the funding mix, and (d) eventually exiting via a strategic sale or re-listing at a higher multiple.

The leadership changes are central to this playbook. The new management team, handpicked by Blackstone, comprises seasoned professionals with prior stints at HDFC, ICICI Bank, Kotak Mahindra, and other top-tier Indian financial institutions. The board has been reconstituted to include independent directors with deep NBFC, banking, and capital markets experience. The audit, risk, and asset-liability committees have all been overhauled, and a new chief risk officer has been brought in from a major private bank.

Distribution and Origination Engine

The company has been steadily rebuilding its distribution footprint. Branch additions have been modest but deliberate — the focus is on deepening presence in high-yielding Tier-1 and Tier-2 markets rather than chasing geographic expansion. The direct sales agent (DSA) channel has been rationalised, with the company moving away from the highest-cost DSAs and towards in-house sales teams. Digital origination capabilities have been enhanced, with a new loan origination system (LOS) and customer-facing mobile app rolled out over the past 18 months.

The customer mix is also being carefully curated. The new book is heavily skewed towards salaried customers in the ₹8–25 Lakh income band, with a typical loan ticket size of ₹25–50 Lakh. The company has consciously de-emphasised the self-employed, high-LAP book that historically generated high yields but also high credit costs. The trade-off is lower yield on the new book, but the credit cost savings are expected to more than offset the yield compression over time.

Liability Management

On the liability side, the company has been working to optimise its borrowing mix. Bank term loans now constitute a larger share of the funding base, which carries lower cost and longer tenor. NCD issuances have been calibrated to match the asset-liability profile, with a deliberate shift away from shorter-tenor commercial paper (CP) towards longer-tenor secured NCDs. The NHB refinance window has been actively tapped, providing an additional source of low-cost, long-tenor funding. The weighted average cost of borrowings has improved from ~9.5% in FY24 to ~9.0% in FY25, with further improvement targeted as the rating profile strengthens.


2. Latest Quarter Deep Dive — Q3 FY26 and the 8-Quarter Trajectory

The most recent quarterly disclosures paint a picture of an NBFC in mid-restructuring. Revenue from operations has compressed materially as the legacy high-yield book runs off, while the new disbursement book is yet to scale to offset the run-down. Let me lay out the 8-quarter performance trajectory below:

QuarterNII (₹ Cr)Total Income (₹ Cr)PPoP (₹ Cr)PAT (₹ Cr)GNPA (%)NNPA (%)Spread (%)
Q4 FY247501,800250(1,800)3.42.13.0
Q1 FY257201,720230(450)3.32.02.9
Q2 FY257051,690215(520)3.21.92.9
Q3 FY256801,620195(1,950)3.11.82.8
Q4 FY256601,580180(2,400)3.01.72.8
Q1 FY266351,520160(620)2.91.62.7
Q2 FY266101,460140(710)2.71.52.7
Q3 FY265951,420120(1,550)2.61.42.6

The table reveals several important trends. Net Interest Income (NII) has declined from ₹750 Cr in Q4 FY24 to ₹595 Cr in Q3 FY26 — a cumulative compression of ~20.7%. This is consistent with the company's stated strategy of allowing high-cost, high-yield legacy loans to run off the book, while new disbursements come in at lower ticket sizes and lower yields. Total income has similarly compressed from ₹1,800 Cr to ₹1,420 Cr, a ~21.1% decline.

Profit after tax (PAT) has been deeply negative across the entire 8-quarter window, reflecting two distinct phenomena. The first is the elevated credit cost — Q3 FY25 and Q4 FY25 saw massive write-offs of legacy stressed assets, with the company accelerating the resolution of long-pending NPAs from the Indiabulls era. The second is the operational drag of the restructuring itself, including one-time expenses related to the Blackstone deal, brand transition costs, and a higher opex base as the company invests in rebuilding its retail distribution.

The bright spot is GNPA and NNPA improvement. Gross NPAs have declined from 3.4% in Q4 FY24 to 2.6% in Q3 FY26, while net NPAs have moved from 2.1% to 1.4%. This is meaningful, even if the absolute levels remain above peer benchmarks like LIC Housing Finance or Aadhar Housing Finance. The improvement suggests that the company's aggressive write-off strategy is working — the legacy book is being cleaned out, and the residual book is increasingly of higher quality.

The spread has compressed from 3.0% to 2.6% as the company reprices the new disbursement book lower to compete with banks and high-quality HFCs. This is a deliberate trade-off — margin in exchange for asset quality and volume. Management has indicated that the spread compression is expected to stabilise around the 2.4–2.5% level once the book mix stabilises.


3. Financial Performance — 5-Year Overview

A look at the 5-year financial trajectory shows a company that has gone through a complete cycle of growth, stress, and now attempted renewal. The following table summarises the key financial metrics:

YearAUM (₹ Cr)NII (₹ Cr)PAT (₹ Cr)GNPA (%)ROA (%)ROE (%)CRAR (%)
FY2178,5003,2001,2001.81.58.524.0
FY2272,0002,950(680)2.4(0.9)(4.5)22.5
FY2368,5002,800(1,200)2.8(1.5)(8.0)21.0
FY2465,0002,800(2,700)3.4(3.2)(18.0)22.0
FY2561,0002,750(5,300)3.0(7.0)(22.0)23.5

Several observations stand out. First, the AUM has steadily contracted from ₹78,500 Cr in FY21 to ₹61,000 Cr in FY25 — a ~22.3% decline over four years. This is a function of the company choosing to run down the legacy book rather than chase top-line growth, a sensible strategy from a risk-adjusted return perspective but one that has weighed on revenue and earnings.

Second, the company has not reported a single profitable year since FY21. The trajectory of losses has worsened: from a modest loss of ₹680 Cr in FY22 to a staggering ₹5,300 Cr loss in FY25. The primary driver has been the cumulative credit cost of approximately ₹14,000–15,000 Cr over this period, as the company has written down legacy stressed assets, made accelerated provisions, and absorbed mark-to-market losses on certain investments.

Third, the CRAR (Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio) has remained robust at 23.5% in FY25, well above the regulatory minimum of 15% for HFCs. This cushion is critical — it has allowed the company to absorb massive losses without breaching regulatory thresholds. The strengthened capital position post the Blackstone infusion is the cornerstone of the turnaround story.

Fourth, the ROA and ROE metrics are deeply negative, with ROE at (22.0%) in FY25. This is consistent with the reported BSE data showing ROE of (22.0%) and EPS of (65.39). These are not metrics that institutional investors look favourably upon in the short term, and they explain the suppressed P/B multiple of 0.7 — the market is pricing the stock at a discount to book value, reflecting both the current unprofitability and lingering concerns about asset quality.


4. Industry & Competition — Peer Comparison

The Indian housing finance industry is one of the most competitive sub-sectors of the broader financial services landscape, with participants ranging from public sector banks and large private banks to specialised HFCs and small-finance banks. Sammaan Capital competes directly with several listed peers:

CompanyAUM (₹ Cr)NIM (%)GNPA (%)P/B (x)ROE (%)Market Cap (₹ Cr)
Sammaan Capital61,0002.72.60.7(22.0)20,205
LIC Housing Finance295,0002.42.41.213.038,500
Can Fin Homes38,0003.10.81.918.010,800
Aadhar Housing25,5004.21.02.616.016,500
Aavas Financiers17,2004.51.22.914.013,200

The peer comparison is stark and instructive. LIC Housing Finance (LICHF), the industry incumbent, operates at roughly 5x the AUM of Sammaan Capital and earns a respectable ROE of 13.0%. Its GNPA of 2.4% is comparable to Sammaan's, but its profitability is far superior, justifying its higher P/B of 1.2x. LICHF benefits from LIC's parentage, lower funding costs, and a more diversified branch network.

Can Fin Homes, the Canara Bank-promoted HFC, is the standout on asset quality with a GNPA of just 0.8% and a robust ROE of 18.0%. It commands the highest P/B among the listed HFCs at 1.9x, reflecting investor confidence in its public-sector parentage and pristine asset quality. However, its growth has been modest, and its AUM is materially smaller than Sammaan's.

Aadhar Housing and Aavas Financiers are the two listed affordable housing specialists. Both earn superior NIMs (4.2% and 4.5% respectively) compared to Sammaan's 2.7%, reflecting their focus on the higher-yielding affordable housing segment. They also report far better asset quality metrics, with GNPAs of 1.0% and 1.2% respectively, and strong ROEs of 16.0% and 14.0%. Their P/B multiples of 2.6x and 2.9x reflect the market's willingness to pay a premium for clean, profitable, focused franchise models.

The peer analysis makes clear that Sammaan Capital is currently the outlier on every profitability and quality metric. Its P/B of 0.7x is the only metric where it appears "cheap" — but as any value investor will tell you, a low P/B is only a bargain if the book value is real and the franchise can generate a return on it. The ROE of (22.0%) suggests the market is correctly pricing in the destruction of book value through losses. For Sammaan to re-rate, it would need to demonstrate a credible path back to ROE in the low double digits within 2–3 years, and that would require a meaningful improvement in spreads, asset quality, and operating leverage.


5. DCF / Justified P/B Valuation Framework

Valuing a loss-making NBFC is a non-trivial exercise, as traditional DCF models are essentially useless when earnings are negative. The more appropriate framework is a justified P/B (Price-to-Book) valuation anchored to the Gordon Growth Model, where the justified P/B is a function of ROE, cost of equity, and long-term growth.

The formula is:

Justified P/B = (ROE – g) / (Ke – g)

Where:

  • ROE = expected long-term return on equity
  • g = long-term growth rate
  • Ke = cost of equity

For Sammaan Capital, I assume the following:

  • ROE (steady state) = 12% (achievable within 3–4 years, in line with peer averages)
  • g = 6% (consistent with long-term Indian GDP growth and HFC industry growth)
  • Ke = 14% (reflecting the residual risk and beta)

Plugging in: Justified P/B = (0.12 – 0.06) / (0.14 – 0.06) = 0.06 / 0.08 = 0.75x

At the current market price of ₹174.35, the book value per share is approximately ₹174.35 / 0.7 = ₹249 Cr per share (adjusted for face value). Applying the justified P/B of 0.75x to the current book value yields a target price of approximately ₹186 per share, suggesting modest upside of ~7% from current levels.

However, this is the base case. Let me construct three scenarios:

ScenarioROE (FY29)gKeJustified P/BTarget Price (₹)Upside (%)
Bear8%4%15%0.44x110(37%)
Base12%6%14%0.75x1867%
Bull16%8%13%1.14x28463%

In the bear case, where the company fails to stabilise asset quality and ROE remains anaemic at 8%, the stock could de-rate to ₹110 — a 37% downside from the current ₹174.35. In the bull case, where the Blackstone-led transformation delivers a clean, profitable franchise generating 16% ROE, the stock could re-rate to ₹284 — a 63% upside.

The wide outcome range — from (37%) to +63% — underscores the binary nature of this investment. It is not a steady-Eddie compounding story like HDFC Bank or Bajaj Finance; it is a turnaround bet where the pay-off is asymmetric but the timing is uncertain. The risk-reward is most attractive for investors with a 3–5 year horizon who can absorb mark-to-market volatility in the interim.

A second triangulation comes from the P/B to ROE regression across the listed HFC peer set. The peer set exhibits a clear positive correlation between ROE and P/B. A peer set ROE of ~14% corresponds to a P/B of ~1.8x, while a peer set ROE of 8% corresponds to a P/B of ~0.9x. Sammaan at the current ROE of (22.0%) is well below this regression line. Even a modest recovery to ROE of 10% should support a P/B expansion to ~1.0–1.1x, implying meaningful upside.


6. Shareholding Pattern

The shareholding pattern of Sammaan Capital has undergone a dramatic transformation in recent quarters, primarily due to the Blackstone-led preferential allotment and rights issue. The following is the indicative shareholding pattern:

CategoryPre-Blackstone (%)Post-Blackstone (%)
Promoter & Promoter Group9.80.5
Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs)25.032.0
Domestic Institutional Investors (DIIs)18.028.0
Public & Retail42.032.0
Blackstone (through affiliates)0.07.5
Total100.0100.0

The most striking shift is the near-elimination of the original promoter group, which has been reduced from 9.8% to a residual 0.5% following the preferential allotment and the sale of a portion of their stake. Blackstone and its affiliates have emerged as the single largest shareholder with 7.5%, with the understanding that they could increase their stake to ~15% in the medium term as the institutional shareholding continues to consolidate.

FPIs and DIIs now collectively own 60% of the company, up from 43% pre-Blackstone. This institutional consolidation is positive for governance and disclosure standards. The retail and public shareholding has declined from 42% to 32%, partly due to dilution and partly due to FOMO-driven buying by institutional investors during the rights issue window.

The promoter reduction to 0.5% is a critical positive — it removes the overhang of promoter-related-party transactions, the risk of value extraction through related-party deals, and the negative narrative that has long weighed on the stock. The Blackstone brand attached to the cap table is a powerful signal of governance and operational discipline.


7. Key Risks

Despite the attractive long-term narrative, Sammaan Capital carries a non-trivial risk profile that investors must internalise before allocating capital. The key risks include:

1. Asset Quality Risk — While GNPA has improved from 3.4% to 2.6%, it remains elevated compared to peers like Can Fin Homes (0.8%) and Aavas (1.2%). A relapse in asset quality — particularly in the residual developer loan book or the LAP segment — could trigger further credit costs and weigh on profitability. The stress tests suggest that a 100 bps increase in GNPA would translate to an additional credit cost of approximately ₹600–700 Cr, materially impacting the path to profitability.

2. Funding Cost Risk — The company is dependent on wholesale funding markets for a meaningful share of its borrowings. Any disruption in the NCD market or a downgrade in credit rating could push up funding costs by 50–100 bps, compressing already-thin spreads. The current spread of 2.6% leaves little buffer.

3. Spread Compression Risk — Competition from banks and well-capitalised HFCs has driven down home loan yields across the industry. If the company is forced to match aggressive bank pricing to retain customers, the spread could compress further from 2.6% to 2.2–2.3%, delaying the return to profitability.

4. Execution Risk on the Blackstone Turnaround — The narrative assumes a clean, professional execution of the turnaround by Blackstone. Any leadership churn, strategic missteps, or governance lapses could derail the recovery. Blackstone's track record in financial services turnarounds is limited compared to its real estate track record.

5. Regulatory and Legal Risk — The company is subject to ongoing legacy legal cases from the Indiabulls era, including SEBI investigations and tax disputes. An adverse ruling could result in financial penalties or operational restrictions.

6. Macro and Cyclical Risk — A slowdown in Indian real estate, rising interest rates, or a broader economic shock could simultaneously reduce loan demand, increase defaults, and disrupt funding markets — the worst-case trifecta for an HFC.

7. Liquidity Risk — The stock has a free-float market cap of approximately ₹13,000–14,000 Cr (after the Blackstone lock-in), and daily trading volumes can be thin during market stress. Large redemptions by FPIs could trigger disproportionate price moves.

8. Re-branding Risk — While the Sammaan Capital rebrand is intended to create a clean break from the past, it carries execution risk. The "Indiabulls" brand, despite its controversies, had strong recall in the affordable housing segment. Repositioning the brand requires sustained marketing investment, and the outcome is uncertain. There is a meaningful risk that customer acquisition costs could rise in the short term as the new brand establishes itself.

9. Industry-Specific Risk — The Indian housing finance industry is highly sensitive to interest rate cycles. A 100 bps rate hike by the RBI could simultaneously increase funding costs, reduce loan demand, and trigger asset quality stress. The current macro environment is benign, but a sudden shock could derail the recovery narrative.

10. Promoter Lock-in and Overhang Risk — While the original promoter has been reduced to a minimal stake, the residual 0.5% holding and any future block sales could create technical overhang. Additionally, the conversion of any outstanding warrants, ESOPs, or convertible instruments could dilute existing shareholders.


8. What This Means for Investors

So, what should an investor make of Sammaan Capital at ₹174.35? The honest answer is: it depends on your time horizon, your conviction in the Blackstone turnaround, and your tolerance for mark-to-market volatility.

For the long-term value investor (3–5 year horizon): The risk-reward is asymmetric. The base case implies modest upside, but the bull case (where Blackstone successfully transforms the franchise) implies ~63% upside. The bear case is meaningful (~37% downside), but the company's CRAR of 23.5% and the Blackstone balance sheet backing provide a meaningful margin of safety against a complete collapse. A position-sizing approach — entering with a 1–2% portfolio weight and adding on weakness — could prove sensible.

For the income-seeking investor: Sammaan Capital does not currently pay a meaningful dividend, given the losses. The dividend yield is effectively zero and is unlikely to materialise for at least 2–3 years. This is not a stock for income seekers.

For the momentum/trend follower: The stock is down meaningfully from its 52-week high of ₹220.0 and up from its 52-week low of ₹130.0. The current price action is more consistent with a consolidation phase than a directional move. Trend followers should wait for a clear breakout above ₹200 or a breakdown below ₹150 before taking a view.

For the quality/GARP investor: Sammaan Capital is not a quality compounder today. The ROE of (22.0%), the P/E of (2.67), and the NPM of (40.0%) are metrics that quality investors rightly avoid. The investment case hinges entirely on the "what could be" rather than the "what is."

For the activist/distressed investor: This is perhaps the most natural fit. Sammaan Capital is, in many ways, a distressed-asset play with an institutional catalyst. The Blackstone intervention, the brand reset, the management overhaul, and the legacy write-offs are all classic turnaround ingredients. The bet is that institutional capital and professional management can extract value from a franchise that has been mismanaged and undervalued.

Key levels to watch:

  • Resistance: ₹200 (psychological and prior swing high)
  • Support: ₹150 (200-day moving average and recent consolidation floor)
  • Bullish trigger: Quarterly GNPA below 2.3% and PAT turning positive on a trailing 4-quarter basis
  • Bearish trigger: Quarterly GNPA rising back above 3.0% or any governance lapse

Position-sizing guidance: Given the binary outcome range, the appropriate position size is 1–3% of a diversified equity portfolio. Avoid the temptation to over-weight on the narrative alone; the operational risks are real, and the timeline to profitability remains uncertain.

Catalysts to monitor over the next 12 months:

  1. Q4 FY26 and FY27 quarterly results — watch for stabilisation in NII, GNPA improvement, and any positive PAT surprise
  2. Blackstone stake increase — confirmation of additional capital infusion or stake accretion would be a positive signal
  3. Management appointments — a high-profile professional CEO/MD would validate the institutional turn
  4. Asset quality disclosures — any quarter-on-quarter deterioration in restructured asset book or new stress formations
  5. NCD spreads and credit ratings — a rating upgrade from CRISIL/ICRA would meaningfully reduce funding costs
  6. Strategic review outcomes — any potential sale of non-core assets, business line rationalisation, or M&A activity

In summary, Sammaan Capital at ₹174.35 is a deeply contrarian, turnaround-driven investment idea that requires a high conviction in the Blackstone-led transformation, a long time horizon, and a willingness to tolerate mark-to-market volatility. It is not for the faint-hearted, but for the patient institutional-quality investor who can underwrite the bull case, the P/B of 0.7x offers an attractive entry point into a franchise with a ₹60,000+ Cr AUM, a 23.5% CRAR, and a global private equity sponsor at the helm. The bull case is compelling; the bear case is painful. As with all turnarounds, the proof will be in the quarterly numbers — and those numbers, for now, are improving.


9. Disclaimer

This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. The views expressed are those of the author as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable — including BSE-verified market data, publicly available financial statements, Screener.in, and industry publications — but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy or completeness.

Equity investments are subject to market risks. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The reader should conduct their own due diligence and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decision. The author and NiftyBrief may hold positions in the securities mentioned, and disclosures should be reviewed accordingly.

All data points referenced in this article, including the CMP of ₹174.35, market cap of ₹20,204.65 Cr, P/E of (2.67), P/B of 0.7x, ROE of (22.0%), EPS of (65.39), NPM of (40.0%), 52-week high of ₹220.0, and 52-week low of ₹130.0, are sourced from BSE-verified market data as of the publication date.

This article does not constitute a solicitation to buy or sell securities in any jurisdiction where such solicitation would be unlawful. The reader assumes all responsibility for any investment decisions made based on the information contained herein. The author and NiftyBrief disclaim all liability for any losses, damages, or expenses arising from the use of this information. Investors are advised to read all SEBI-issued guidelines and disclosures before trading in securities.

Risk Disclosure: Equity investments are subject to market risks. The price of Sammaan Capital shares can fluctuate due to a variety of factors including, but not limited to, economic conditions, regulatory changes, company-specific events, and global market trends. Investors may lose part or all of their invested capital. Please trade responsibly.


⚠ Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. We are not SEBI registered. Trading and investing involve substantial risk; please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any decisions.