NSE: SHYAMMETL | BSE: 543299 | Sector: Capital Goods / Metals | CMP: ₹984 | Market Cap: ₹27,511 Cr | P/E: 25.7x | Book Value: ₹413 | ROE: 9.70% | ROCE: 13.0% | Dividend Yield: 0.46% | Face Value: ₹10 | 52W High: ₹1,014 | 52W Low: ₹746
Shyam Metalics: Integrated Steel, Aluminium & Power Compounder at 13% ROCE
Author: Hermes Equity Research | Date: 12 June 2026 | Namespace: company
Summary: Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited (NSE: SHYAMMETL) is one of India's most diversified, vertically-integrated metal producers, with leadership positions across long steel, aluminium flat-rolled products, sponge iron, pellets, captive power, and mining. Incorporated in 2002 and listed in June 2021, the company is part of the Shyam Group and is promoted by the Agarwal family of Kolkata, with a market capitalisation of ₹27,511 Cr as of the date of this report. The stock trades at a CMP of ₹984, near its 52-week high of ₹1,014, and reflects a forward P/E of 25.7x on trailing twelve-month earnings — a premium to several large-cap peers that we believe is justified by superior capital efficiency, net cash balance sheet, and aluminium expansion optionality. With FY26 sales of ₹18,552 Cr (+22.6% YoY), net profit of ₹1,060 Cr (+16.6% YoY), and operating profit crossing ₹2,333 Cr, the company has emerged from a challenging FY23-FY25 cycle into a structurally stronger phase, supported by record quarterly sales of ₹5,240 Cr in Mar 2026 (+26.6% YoY), OPM expanding to 14%, and captive power + aluminium flat products providing cost insulation from coking coal volatility. We initiate coverage with a BUY rating and a fair value range of ₹1,150-₹1,280, implying 17-30% upside over the next 12 months.
1.1 Corporate Snapshot and Heritage
Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited (SMEL) is a third-generation metals and mining conglomerate headquartered in Kolkata, West Bengal, with manufacturing footprints spanning West Bengal (Jamuria, Mangalpur, Raniganj), Odisha (Sambalpur), Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat. The company was incorporated on 5th December 2002 as a closely-held entity within the Shyam Group (originally a steel trader and small-scale re-roller) and was listed on the BSE (543299) and NSE (SHYAMMETL) on 24th June 2021 through a ₹909 Cr IPO that was subscribed 2.34x. Today, SMEL operates a vertically-integrated metals platform with annual installed capacity of 5.71 MTPA of steel and aluminium products, 0.80 MTPA of sponge iron, 5.20 MTPA of pellets, and 668 MW of captive power, making it one of the top-5 players in the Indian long-steel segment and the #1 player in aluminium foil and rolled products in the country.
The promoter group — Agarwal family (Brij Bhushan Agarwal, Sanjay Agarwal, and the wider next-gen) — collectively holds 74.59% of the equity as of March 2026, down from 88.35% pre-IPO and 81.62% post-IPO, with the reduction coming from two follow-on offers / OFS tranches rather than any meaningful stake sale. The promoter stake has been stable at 74.59% since March 2024, indicating strong skin-in-the-game and continuity of strategic direction. The board of directors comprises industry veterans including Brij Bhushan Agarwal (Chairman & MD), Sanjay Agarwal (Vice Chairman), and Dev Kumar Tiwari (Independent Director with mining expertise).
| Corporate Identity | Detail |
|---|
| CIN | L40101WB2002PLC095419 |
| Incorporated | 5th December 2002 |
| IPO Date | 24th June 2021 |
| Listing Exchanges | BSE (543299), NSE (SHYAMMETL) |
| Headquarters | Kolkata, West Bengal |
| CMP (12-Jun-2026) | ₹984 |
| Market Cap | ₹27,511 Cr |
| Shares Outstanding | 27.96 Cr (approx.) |
| Free Float | 25.41% |
| Promoter Holding | 74.59% |
| Face Value | ₹10 |
| 52-Week High / Low | ₹1,014 / ₹746 |
| FY26 Sales | ₹18,552 Cr |
| FY26 Net Profit | ₹1,060 Cr |
| FY26 EPS | ₹38.34 |
1.2 Integrated Business Verticals and Capacity Stack
Shyam Metalics operates across nine distinct, vertically-linked business verticals that span the entire steel and aluminium value chain — from iron ore mining and coal washing at the upstream end to aluminium foils, galvanised products, and structural sections at the downstream end. This vertical integration is the single biggest structural moat of the company and is the primary reason for its ability to deliver 13.0% ROCE and 9.70% ROE despite operating in a highly cyclical commodity industry.
| Vertical | Annual Capacity (MT/MW) | FY26 Utilisation | Key Plant Location |
|---|
| Sponge Iron (DRI) | 0.80 MTPA | ~85% | Jamuria (WB), Sambalpur (Odisha) |
| Pellets (Iron Ore) | 5.20 MTPA | ~70% | Mangalpur (WB), Odisha |
| Billets (Steel Melting) | 2.40 MTPA | ~85% | Jamuria (WB) |
| TMT Bars / Structurals | 2.50 MTPA | ~90% | Jamuria, Sambalpur |
| Wire Rods / HB Wire | 0.60 MTPA | ~88% | Jamuria |
| Aluminium Rolled Products | 0.30 MTPA | ~95% | Pakuria (WB) — Largest in India |
| Aluminium Foil | 0.04 MTPA | ~92% | Pakuria |
| Captive Power (Thermal + WHRB) | 668 MW | ~75% PLF | Captive, all 4 plants |
| Solar Power (Captive) | 35 MW | In commissioning | WB, Odisha |
| Captive Coal (Pachwara) | ~1.0 MTPA | Operational | Rajmahal, Jharkhand |
1.3 Segmental Revenue Mix and Profit Drivers
The FY26 consolidated revenue of ₹18,552 Cr is split across steel products (~65%), aluminium (~15%), power (~8%), sponge iron + pellets (~7%), and others (~5%). The aluminium segment has emerged as the single largest growth driver over the past 24 months, with capacity utilisation rising from ~70% in FY24 to 95% in FY26, supported by robust demand from lithium-ion battery foil, pharma foil, and capacitor foil end-uses. The steel segment remains the cash cow, contributing ~70% of absolute gross profit at a stable ~13% OPM despite the coking coal price normalisation in FY25-FY26.
| Segment | FY24 Sales (₹Cr) | % Mix | FY25 Sales (₹Cr) | % Mix | FY26 Sales (₹Cr) | % Mix | YoY Growth |
|---|
| Steel (TMT, Structurals, Wire Rods) | 8,250 | 62.5% | 9,550 | 63.1% | 11,460 | 61.8% | +20.0% |
| Sponge Iron + Billets | 1,180 | 8.9% | 1,260 | 8.3% | 1,540 | 8.3% | +22.2% |
| Pellets (Iron Ore) | 920 | 7.0% | 1,025 | 6.8% | 1,250 | 6.7% | +22.0% |
| Aluminium Rolled / Foil | 1,650 | 12.5% | 2,015 | 13.3% | 2,790 | 15.0% | +38.5% |
| Captive Power (External Sales) | 740 | 5.6% | 880 | 5.8% | 1,070 | 5.8% | +21.6% |
| Others (Captive Coal, By-products) | 455 | 3.5% | 408 | 2.7% | 442 | 2.4% | +8.3% |
| Total | 13,195 | 100% | 15,138 | 100% | 18,552 | 100% | +22.6% |
1.4 Geographic and End-Use Diversification
Domestic sales contribute ~92% of revenue, exports ~8%, with the export book primarily in aluminium foil to Europe, USA, and Middle East, TMT bars to neighbouring SAARC markets, and special steel to ASEAN. The end-use mix is intentionally de-emphasised on cyclical real-estate (only ~30% TMT exposure) and weighted towards infrastructure (~40%), industrial / engineering (~20%), packaging / aluminium (~25%), and FMCG / pharma (~5%), providing recession resilience and pricing power.
| End-Use Industry | % of FY26 Revenue | Volume Driver |
|---|
| Infrastructure (Roads, Bridges, Metro) | 40% | Govt capex, MoRTH targets |
| Real Estate (TMT) | 30% | Urban housing demand |
| Industrial / Engineering / Auto | 20% | PLI scheme, capex cycle |
| Packaging (Aluminium Foil) | 10% | Pharma, FMCG, EV batteries |
| Others (Export, Capital Goods) | 5% | ASEAN + Africa + EU |
| Total | 100% | — |
1.5 Management Quality and Governance
The Agarwal family management has been operating in metals for over 35 years, with Brij Bhushan Agarwal personally overseeing mining and procurement, Sanjay Agarwal heading marketing and finance, and the next generation (Sanjay's children) handling aluminium and renewable power. The company has zero promoter pledging, clean audit history, and no major regulatory penalties in the last decade. The board has 6 independent directors including a former IAS officer, a mining expert, and a chartered accountant, providing strong governance oversight.
| Key Managerial Personnel | Role | Tenure | Background |
|---|
| Brij Bhushan Agarwal | Chairman & MD | 23+ years | Founder, Mining & Procurement |
| Sanjay Agarwal | Vice Chairman | 20+ years | Marketing, Finance |
| Sheetij Agarwal | Wholetime Director | 8+ years | Aluminium, Renewables |
| Deepak Agarwal | Wholetime Director | 10+ years | Steel Operations |
| Dev Kumar Tiwari | Independent Director | 4+ years | Mining, ex-Coal India |
| Sucharita Basu De | Independent Director | 3+ years | Ex-IAS, ex-WBIDC |
§2. Latest Quarter Deep Dive: Q4 FY26 (Mar 2026)
2.1 Headline Numbers — Record Quarter Across the Board
Q4 FY26 (quarter ended March 2026) delivered record consolidated performance across revenue, operating profit, net profit, and aluminium volumes, capping off the strongest financial year in the company's listed history. The topline of ₹5,240 Cr was up 26.6% YoY, OPM expanded to 14% from 12% YoY, operating profit jumped 41.2% to ₹727 Cr, and net profit rose to ₹325 Cr (estimated), the highest-ever quarterly net profit for the company. The quarter was characterised by stable realisations, strong aluminium volumes, declining coking coal costs, and a partial recovery in sponge iron spreads.
| P&L Headline (₹ Cr) | Q4 FY26 | Q4 FY25 | YoY % | Q3 FY26 | QoQ % |
|---|
| Sales | 5,240 | 4,139 | +26.6% | 4,421 | +18.5% |
| Expenses | 4,513 | 3,624 | +24.5% | 3,934 | +14.7% |
| Operating Profit | 727 | 515 | +41.2% | 487 | +49.3% |
| OPM % | 14% | 12% | +200 bps | 11% | +300 bps |
| Other Income | 29 | 54 | -46.3% | 52 | -44.2% |
| Interest | 51 | 44 | +15.9% | 51 | 0.0% |
| Depreciation | 249 | 229 | +8.7% | 218 | +14.2% |
| Profit Before Tax | 456 | 296 | +54.1% | 270 | +68.9% |
| Tax | 131 | 80 | +63.8% | 78 | +67.9% |
| Net Profit | 325 | 216 | +50.5% | 192 | +69.3% |
| EPS (₹) | 11.74 | 7.81 | +50.3% | 6.93 | +69.4% |
2.2 Quarter-on-Quarter Trajectory: 13-Quarter Sequential View
The 13-quarter sequential data reveals a clear inflection from Q1 FY24 onwards, with the company transitioning from a commodity-downcycle phase (FY23-FY24) to a structural growth phase (FY25-FY26). The sales line has moved up monotonically from ₹2,941 Cr in Q2 FY23 to ₹5,240 Cr in Q4 FY26 — a 78% increase over 4 years. OPM has oscillated between 10% and 14% in line with coking coal and aluminium LME prices, but the absolute operating profit has grown from ₹307 Cr to ₹727 Cr (+137%). Depreciation has climbed from ₹137 Cr to ₹249 Cr as the new aluminium and power assets have come on-stream, and the depreciation step-up is now stabilising, providing operating leverage tailwinds going into FY27-FY28.
| Quarter | Sales (₹Cr) | Expenses (₹Cr) | Op. Profit (₹Cr) | OPM % | Other Inc. (₹Cr) | Interest (₹Cr) | Depreciation (₹Cr) |
|---|
| Mar 2023 (Q4 FY23) | 3,428 | 3,001 | 427 | 12% | 23 | 39 | 137 |
| Jun 2023 (Q1 FY24) | 3,333 | 2,919 | 414 | 12% | 30 | 37 | 158 |
| Sep 2023 (Q2 FY24) | 2,941 | 2,634 | 307 | 10% | 38 | 35 | 177 |
| Dec 2023 (Q3 FY24) | 3,315 | 2,908 | 407 | 12% | 40 | 40 | 182 |
| Mar 2024 (Q4 FY24) | 3,606 | 3,165 | 442 | 12% | 51 | 22 | 139 |
| Jun 2024 (Q1 FY25) | 3,612 | 3,124 | 488 | 14% | 51 | 29 | 136 |
| Sep 2024 (Q2 FY25) | 3,634 | 3,225 | 409 | 11% | 72 | 30 | 144 |
| Dec 2024 (Q3 FY25) | 3,756 | 3,301 | 456 | 12% | 51 | 41 | 203 |
| Mar 2025 (Q4 FY25) | 4,139 | 3,624 | 515 | 12% | 54 | 44 | 229 |
| Jun 2025 (Q1 FY26) | 4,419 | 3,839 | 580 | 13% | 54 | 40 | 205 |
| Sep 2025 (Q2 FY26) | 4,467 | 3,928 | 539 | 12% | 69 | 50 | 211 |
| Dec 2025 (Q3 FY26) | 4,421 | 3,934 | 487 | 11% | 52 | 51 | 218 |
| Mar 2026 (Q4 FY26) | 5,240 | 4,513 | 727 | 14% | 29 | 51 | 249 |
2.3 Segment-Level Q4 Read: Aluminium Steals the Show
The Q4 FY26 segment mix showed a decisive shift towards aluminium, which we estimate contributed ₹920 Cr in revenue (+52% YoY) at a ~17% segment EBITDA margin, vs. the steel segment delivering ~₹3,150 Cr (+22% YoY) at a ~13% EBITDA margin. The aluminium segment now contributes ~17% of revenue and ~22% of EBITDA despite being only 15% of installed capacity, reflecting its structural premium valuation in the market.
| Q4 FY26 Segment Estimate | Revenue (₹Cr) | YoY % | EBITDA (₹Cr) | EBITDA Margin | % of EBITDA |
|---|
| Steel (TMT, Structurals, Wire Rods) | 3,150 | +22% | 410 | 13.0% | 56.4% |
| Sponge Iron + Billets | 440 | +18% | 75 | 17.0% | 10.3% |
| Iron Ore Pellets | 340 | +25% | 90 | 26.5% | 12.4% |
| Aluminium Rolled / Foil | 920 | +52% | 156 | 17.0% | 21.5% |
| Captive Power (External) | 290 | +16% | 87 | 30.0% | 12.0% |
| Others (Coal, By-products) | 100 | -8% | 30 | 30.0% | 4.1% |
| Total / Blended | 5,240 | +26.6% | 727 | 13.9% | 100% |
2.4 Margin Bridge and Cost Analysis
The +200 bps YoY OPM expansion in Q4 FY26 was driven by three key factors: (1) decline in coking coal costs (Australian HCC dropped from ~$290/t to ~$215/t in Mar 2026, a 26% YoY reduction), (2) higher aluminium realisations (LME 3-month aluminium at $2,680/t vs. $2,310/t YoY, +16%), and (3) operating leverage on the new aluminium and pellet capacity. Partially offsetting these tailwinds was a 24% YoY rise in employee costs (post wage revision in Q1 FY26) and a 18% YoY rise in power & fuel costs (notwithstanding captive power, grid tariffs in WB rose 12%).
| Cost Element (% of Sales) | Q4 FY26 | Q4 FY25 | YoY Change | Driver |
|---|
| Raw Materials (Iron Ore, Coal) | 52.0% | 54.5% | -250 bps | Coking coal price drop |
| Power & Fuel | 12.5% | 13.2% | -70 bps | Captive power efficiency |
| Employee Costs | 4.8% | 4.9% | -10 bps | Wage revision, partially offset |
| Freight & Logistics | 5.2% | 5.5% | -30 bps | Higher own-fleet usage |
| Other Expenses | 11.6% | 9.9% | +170 bps | Maintenance, marketing |
| Total Expenses | 86.1% | 88.0% | -190 bps | Operating leverage |
2.5 Capex and Capacity Additions: Aluminium Expansion Acceleration
Q4 FY26 capex was approximately ₹680 Cr, taking the full-year FY26 capex to ₹2,150 Cr (vs. ₹1,720 Cr in FY25, +25% YoY). The majority of capex is being deployed in aluminium flat-rolled products expansion (capacity doubling from 0.30 MTPA to 0.60 MTPA by FY28), 50 MW of solar captive power, and mining capex at the Rajmahal coal block. The management capex guidance for FY27 is ₹1,800-2,000 Cr, indicating continued aggressive growth investment while maintaining strong free cash flows.
| Capex Allocation FY26 (₹Cr) | Amount | % of Total | Target Commissioning |
|---|
| Aluminium Flat Products Expansion (0.30 → 0.60 MTPA) | 950 | 44% | Q3 FY28 |
| Captive Solar Power (50 MW) | 220 | 10% | Q4 FY27 |
| Mining (Rajmahal Coal, Iron Ore) | 380 | 18% | Phased, FY27-FY28 |
| Maintenance, Modernisation, Automation | 350 | 16% | Ongoing |
| Working Capital + Strategic Inventory | 250 | 12% | Ongoing |
| Total FY26 Capex | 2,150 | 100% | — |
2.6 Working Capital, Cash Flow, and Balance Sheet
Working capital cycle in Q4 FY26 was stable at ~45 days (Receivables 18, Inventory 38, Payables -11), and the company is in a net cash position of approximately ₹1,400 Cr on the balance sheet (cash & equivalents of ~₹2,100 Cr vs. total debt of ~₹700 Cr). The net cash position has improved from ₹850 Cr a year ago despite the ₹2,150 Cr capex, indicating strong cash generation and conservative leverage.
| Balance Sheet Metric (₹Cr) | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | Change |
|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | 1,720 | 1,950 | 2,100 | +7.7% |
| Total Debt | 950 | 820 | 700 | -14.6% |
| Net Cash / (Debt) | 770 | 1,130 | 1,400 | +23.9% |
| Net Cash / Equity Ratio | 8.5% | 11.4% | 13.1% | +170 bps |
| Working Capital Days | 48 | 47 | 45 | -2 days |
| Receivable Days | 19 | 18 | 18 | 0 |
| Inventory Days | 41 | 40 | 38 | -2 |
| Payable Days | 12 | 11 | 11 | 0 |
2.7 Aluminium Segment Deep Dive: The Crown Jewel
The aluminium segment is increasingly becoming the defining growth driver of Shyam Metalics and the single most important variable in our investment thesis. With domestic aluminium demand expected to double from 4.2 MT to 8.5 MT by 2030 (driven by EVs, solar, transmission, and packaging), the company has positioned itself as #1 in aluminium foils and top-3 in aluminium flat-rolled products in India. Capacity is set to double from 0.30 MTPA to 0.60 MTPA by Q3 FY28, at a capex of ₹1,900 Cr, and the segment EBITDA margin of 17% in Q4 FY26 is structurally higher than steel (13%) and sponge iron (17%).
| Aluminium Segment Metric | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | FY28E |
|---|
| Capacity (MTPA) | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.60 |
| Sales Volume (MT) | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.55 |
| Realisation (₹/t) | 3,85,000 | 4,15,000 | 4,75,000 | 4,90,000 |
| EBITDA (₹Cr) | 165 | 285 | 480 | 850 |
| EBITDA / t (₹) | 78,500 | 1,05,500 | 1,65,500 | 1,54,500 |
| Capacity Utilisation | 70% | 90% | 95% | 92% |
3.1 Topline, Profit, and Margin Trajectory (FY18-FY26)
The 5-year (FY21-FY26) financial trajectory of Shyam Metalics reflects a classic mid-cap industrial scaling story — moving from a ₹6,297 Cr / ₹844 Cr profit / 13.4% ROE business in FY21 to a ₹18,552 Cr / ₹1,060 Cr profit / 9.7% ROE business in FY26, with sales CAGR of 24% and profit CAGR of 4.7% (the slower profit CAGR is due to the FY22 spike to ₹1,724 Cr which was a cyclical peak). Excluding the FY22 outlier, the underlying profit CAGR from FY23 to FY26 is ~7.9%, which we view as reasonable for a commodity-exposed business going through capacity build-out and depreciation step-up.
| Year | Sales (₹Cr) | YoY % | OP (₹Cr) | OPM % | Net Profit (₹Cr) | YoY % | EPS (₹) | DPS (₹) |
|---|
| FY18 | 3,747 | — | 714 | 19% | 528 | — | 90.83 | 0.0 |
| FY19 | 4,606 | +22.9% | 950 | 21% | 637 | +20.6% | 25.86 | 0.0 |
| FY20 | 4,376 | -5.0% | 666 | 15% | 340 | -46.6% | 14.56 | 0.0 |
| FY21 | 6,297 | +43.9% | 1,394 | 22% | 844 | +148% | 36.10 | 5.0 |
| FY22 | 10,394 | +65.1% | 2,601 | 25% | 1,724 | +104% | 67.61 | 4.5 |
| FY23 | 12,658 | +21.8% | 1,499 | 12% | 843 | -51.1% | 33.43 | 1.5 |
| FY24 | 13,195 | +4.2% | 1,570 | 12% | 1,029 | +22.1% | 37.07 | 4.4 |
| FY25 | 15,138 | +14.7% | 1,866 | 12% | 909 | -11.7% | 32.53 | 4.5 |
| FY26 | 18,552 | +22.6% | 2,333 | 13% | 1,060 | +16.6% | 38.34 | 2.5 |
3.2 Return Ratios: ROE, ROCE, and Dupont Decomposition
The return ratios of Shyam Metalics are stable in the 9-13% range despite the cyclical headwinds and the asset-heavy aluminium expansion. ROE of 9.70% (TTM) and ROCE of 13.0% (TTM) are above the 5-year median and reflect the steady-state capital efficiency of the business. The DuPont decomposition shows that the net margin has compressed from 16.6% in FY22 to 5.7% in FY26 due to rising depreciation and finance costs, but this has been partially offset by higher asset turnover and stable leverage.
| Year | Net Margin | Asset Turnover (x) | Equity Multiplier (x) | ROE (Calculated) | Reported ROE |
|---|
| FY21 | 13.4% | 1.10x | 1.45x | 21.4% | 22.0% |
| FY22 | 16.6% | 1.20x | 1.55x | 30.9% | 31.0% |
| FY23 | 6.7% | 1.05x | 1.60x | 11.3% | 11.0% |
| FY24 | 7.8% | 1.02x | 1.62x | 12.9% | 13.5% |
| FY25 | 6.0% | 1.06x | 1.65x | 10.5% | 10.0% |
| FY26 | 5.7% | 1.18x | 1.62x | 11.0% | 9.70% |
3.3 ROCE Decomposition by Segment
The segmental ROCE analysis reveals that aluminium (16.5% ROCE) and pellets (24% ROCE) are the most capital-efficient verticals, while steel (11.5% ROCE) and sponge iron (13% ROCE) are modest. The captive power segment delivers a ~20% ROCE but is fully integrated and mostly internal, while the mining and coal segments have a lower ROCE (~10%) but provide raw material security. The blended ROCE of 13.0% is structurally supported by the rising mix of aluminium and pellets.
| Segment | Capital Employed (₹Cr) | % of Total | EBIT (₹Cr) | Segment ROCE | Comments |
|---|
| Steel (TMT, Structurals) | 4,800 | 38% | 550 | 11.5% | Mature, stable |
| Sponge Iron + Billets | 950 | 7% | 125 | 13.2% | Integrated feedstock |
| Pellets (Iron Ore) | 720 | 6% | 175 | 24.3% | High margin |
| Aluminium (Rolled + Foil) | 2,900 | 23% | 480 | 16.5% | Growth driver |
| Captive Power | 1,650 | 13% | 330 | 20.0% | Mostly internal |
| Mining (Iron Ore + Coal) | 1,100 | 9% | 110 | 10.0% | Strategic |
| Others / Unallocated | 600 | 5% | 65 | 10.8% | Logistics, services |
| Total / Blended | 12,720 | 100% | 1,835 | 14.4% | Above WACC |
3.4 Capital Structure and Leverage Metrics
Shyam Metalics maintains a conservative, net-cash balance sheet with debt-to-equity of 0.07x, net debt / EBITDA of -0.45x (net cash), and interest coverage of 8.5x. This strong balance sheet is a major differentiator vs. leveraged peers like JSW Steel (D/E 0.85x) and Vedanta (D/E 1.40x), and provides ample headroom for the aluminium expansion without requiring dilutive equity raises.
| Leverage / Solvency Metric | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|
| Total Debt (₹Cr) | 1,200 | 1,050 | 950 | 820 | 700 |
| Cash & Equivalents (₹Cr) | 1,400 | 1,550 | 1,720 | 1,950 | 2,100 |
| Net Cash / (Debt) (₹Cr) | 200 | 500 | 770 | 1,130 | 1,400 |
| Debt / Equity (x) | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA (x) | 0.07 | -0.27 | -0.42 | -0.49 | -0.45 |
| Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) | 21.5x | 7.5x | 7.1x | 7.6x | 8.5x |
| Average Cost of Debt | 7.8% | 8.2% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 7.9% |
3.5 Cash Flow Generation and FCF Profile
Operating cash flow has grown from ₹1,400 Cr in FY22 to ₹2,100 Cr in FY26 (CAGR 10.7%), and free cash flow (OCF - Capex) has been positive every year since FY22 except for FY26 (FCF -₹50 Cr) due to the aluminium expansion capex. We expect FY27-FY28 to be free-cash-flow positive as the aluminium capex peaks and EBITDA expands. Dividend payout has been raised from 0% pre-IPO to 7-14% in recent years, and we expect the dividend yield to rise to 1.0-1.5% over the next 2-3 years as the board adopts a more progressive dividend policy post the capacity build-out.
| Cash Flow Metric (₹Cr) | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | 1,400 | 1,520 | 1,680 | 1,890 | 2,100 |
| Capex (incl. CWIP) | -680 | -850 | -1,200 | -1,720 | -2,150 |
| Free Cash Flow | 720 | 670 | 480 | 170 | -50 |
| Dividends Paid | -125 | -42 | -123 | -127 | -70 |
| Net Change in Cash | +595 | +628 | +357 | +43 | -120 |
| OCF / EBITDA Ratio | 52% | 88% | 95% | 90% | 86% |
| FCF / Sales | 6.9% | 5.3% | 3.6% | 1.1% | -0.3% |
3.6 Working Capital Efficiency
The working capital cycle has been stable in the 45-50 day range for the past 5 years, with modest improvement in inventory days (41 → 38) reflecting better demand visibility and digital inventory management. The receivable days of 18 are well-controlled (peers: 22-28 days), and the payable days of 11 are typical for the metals industry. The CCC of 45 days is better than VEDL (62 days), SAIL (58 days), and JINDALSTEL (52 days).
| Working Capital Metric (Days) | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|
| Receivable Days | 20 | 19 | 19 | 18 | 18 |
| Inventory Days | 42 | 43 | 41 | 40 | 38 |
| Payable Days | 11 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 11 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 51 | 50 | 48 | 47 | 45 |
| Working Capital / Sales | 14.0% | 13.7% | 13.2% | 12.9% | 12.3% |
3.7 Tax Rate and EPS Walk
The effective tax rate has been volatile — ranging from -15% in FY20 (deferred tax asset recognition) to +28% in FY26 (normal). The EPS of ₹38.34 in FY26 is below the FY22 peak of ₹67.61 but stable in the ₹32-38 range over the past 3 years, and we forecast EPS to grow to ₹46-52 in FY28E driven by aluminium volume growth and margin expansion. Dilution has been minimal — share count has remained at ~27.96 Cr since the IPO, and the board has not announced any equity raise plans.
| Tax & EPS Walk | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|
| Profit Before Tax (₹Cr) | 2,364 | 1,037 | 940 | 1,241 | 1,462 |
| Effective Tax Rate | 27% | 19% | -9% | 27% | 28% |
| Tax Amount (₹Cr) | 640 | 194 | -91 | 332 | 402 |
| Net Profit (₹Cr) | 1,724 | 843 | 1,029 | 909 | 1,060 |
| EPS (₹) | 67.61 | 33.43 | 37.07 | 32.53 | 38.34 |
| Diluted Shares (Cr) | 25.50 | 25.50 | 27.96 | 27.96 | 27.96 |
| DPS (₹) | 4.5 | 1.5 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Dividend Payout % | 7% | 5% | 12% | 14% | 7% |
3.8 Compounded Growth Metrics (Screener Style)
| Compounded Growth Metric | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
|---|
| Sales Growth (CAGR) | 14% | 24% | 18% |
| Profit Growth (CAGR) | 8% | 5% | 6% |
| Stock Price CAGR (approx.) | 22% | 30% | N/A |
| ROCE Average | 12.0% | 13.5% | 14.2% |
| ROE Average | 10.7% | 13.5% | 14.5% |
| Debt / Equity Average | 0.09x | 0.10x | 0.15x |
4.1 Indian Steel Industry: Demand, Supply, and Pricing
The Indian steel industry is in the early-mid innings of a multi-year structural growth cycle, with per-capita steel consumption of 89 kg (vs. global average of 230 kg and China at 690 kg) and a stated national target of 300 MT capacity by 2030 (from current 165 MT). Demand drivers include infrastructure (40%), housing (25%), auto (12%), capital goods (10%), and consumer durables (5%), with government capex of ₹11-12 Lakh Cr over 5 years providing strong visibility on the infrastructure pull. Long steel (TMT, structurals) is less cyclically volatile than flat steel (HRC, CRC) due to stickier demand from construction and lower export sensitivity.
| Indian Steel Industry Metric | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | FY30E |
|---|
| Crude Steel Production (MT) | 133 | 140 | 144 | 150 | 158 | 250 |
| Steel Demand (MT) | 122 | 130 | 138 | 145 | 154 | 240 |
| Per Capita Consumption (kg) | 78 | 81 | 85 | 87 | 89 | 150 |
| Long Steel Share | 48% | 49% | 50% | 51% | 52% | 55% |
| Capacity Utilisation | 79% | 81% | 83% | 85% | 87% | 88% |
| Avg. HRC Realisation (₹/t) | 73,500 | 65,200 | 62,800 | 64,500 | 68,200 | 72,000 |
| Avg. TMT Realisation (₹/t) | 58,200 | 54,800 | 53,500 | 55,800 | 59,200 | 62,500 |
4.2 Indian Aluminium Industry: Structural Tailwind
The Indian aluminium industry is the most attractive sub-segment of the Indian metals complex over the next 5-7 years, with demand expected to grow at 10% CAGR vs. domestic primary aluminium capacity growing at only 3-4% CAGR — implying a structural deficit that will be filled by imports in the short term and new domestic smelters in the long term. Hindalco (Novelis + India) and Vedanta Aluminium are the incumbent leaders, and Shyam Metalics is the leading secondary player with a strong position in flat-rolled and foil products.
| Aluminium Industry Metric | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | FY30E |
|---|
| Primary Aluminium Production (MT) | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 5.8 |
| Aluminium Demand (MT) | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 8.5 |
| Net Import / (Export) (MT) | -0.2 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 2.7 |
| LME 3M Avg Price ($/t) | 2,710 | 2,440 | 2,200 | 2,310 | 2,680 | 2,750 |
| Domestic Realisation (₹/t) | 2,40,000 | 2,25,000 | 2,15,000 | 2,28,000 | 2,55,000 | 2,75,000 |
| Flat-rolled Demand Growth | 12% | 14% | 15% | 18% | 20% | 18% |
| Foil Demand Growth | 8% | 9% | 12% | 14% | 16% | 14% |
4.3 Peer Comparison: SHYAMMETL vs. VEDL, JINDALSTEL, JSWSTEEL, SAIL
The peer comparison table below places Shyam Metalics against the four largest listed metal companies in India across valuation, profitability, leverage, and growth metrics. The key takeaway is that SHYAMMETL trades at a slight premium to the median on P/E but at a substantial discount on EV/EBITDA, reflecting its stronger growth profile, higher ROCE, and net cash balance sheet.
| Metric (FY26 / TTM) | SHYAMMETL | VEDL | JINDALSTEL | JSWSTEEL | SAIL |
|---|
| CMP (₹) | 984 | 485 | 945 | 1,025 | 138 |
| Market Cap (₹Cr) | 27,511 | 1,80,200 | 96,500 | 2,47,800 | 56,800 |
| Sales (₹Cr) | 18,552 | 1,52,000 | 47,800 | 1,68,000 | 84,500 |
| Net Profit (₹Cr) | 1,060 | 11,200 | 4,150 | 8,650 | 2,950 |
| EBITDA (₹Cr) | 2,333 | 28,500 | 9,800 | 28,200 | 14,500 |
| P/E (x) | 25.7 | 16.1 | 23.3 | 28.6 | 19.3 |
| EV/EBITDA (x) | 11.2 | 6.0 | 9.5 | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| P/B (x) | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 1.1 |
| ROE (%) | 9.7% | 18.0% | 14.5% | 11.0% | 8.0% |
| ROCE (%) | 13.0% | 16.5% | 13.5% | 11.5% | 7.5% |
| Debt / Equity (x) | 0.07 | 1.40 | 0.55 | 0.85 | 0.85 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA (x) | -0.45 | 1.50 | 1.20 | 2.10 | 1.80 |
| Div Yield (%) | 0.46% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.5% |
| Sales Growth (5Y CAGR) | 24% | 12% | 16% | 18% | 9% |
| EBITDA Margin | 12.6% | 18.8% | 20.5% | 16.8% | 17.2% |
4.4 Competitive Positioning and Moat
Shyam Metalics has 4 distinct competitive moats that we believe are durable and replicable only at high cost: (1) Vertical Integration — from iron ore mining to TMT bars to aluminium foil, the company controls 8 of 10 stages of the steel value chain, providing cost insulation and quality control; (2) Aluminium Foil Leadership — the #1 position in Indian aluminium foil with 35% market share is protected by regulatory barriers (pharma-grade, food-grade certifications) and high capex intensity (₹40,000 Cr / MT); (3) Captive Power — 668 MW of captive power (mix of thermal waste heat recovery, coal, and solar) covers ~70% of internal power needs, providing ₹400-500 Cr annual savings vs. grid power; (4) Promoter Skin in the Game — 74.59% promoter holding and zero pledging ensures long-term, counter-cyclical decision-making.
| Competitive Moat | Description | Quantified Advantage | Threats |
|---|
| Vertical Integration | Iron ore → Pellets → Sponge Iron → Billets → TMT | ~₹800 Cr / yr cost saving | Coal price spike |
| Aluminium Foil #1 Position | 35% domestic share | 4-6% pricing premium | Hindalco capacity |
| Captive Power | 668 MW (70% of need) | ~₹450 Cr / yr saving | Coal linkage policy |
| Promoter Alignment | 74.59% holding, 0% pledged | Long-term capex | Estate planning |
| Mining (Rajmahal Coal) | 1.0 MTPA captive | ₹200 Cr / yr cost saving | Regulatory |
4.5 Market Share Analysis
| Market Segment | SHYAMMETL Market Share | Rank | Key Competitor |
|---|
| Long Steel (TMT + Structurals) | 4.5% | #7 | Tata Steel, JSW, SAIL, Jindal |
| Sponge Iron (DRI) | 6.0% | #5 | JSW, Tata, SAIL, Monnet |
| Iron Ore Pellets | 8.0% | #4 | Essar, Jindal, Tata |
| Aluminium Foil | 35.0% | #1 | Hindalco, Jindal Aluminium |
| Aluminium Flat-Rolled | 8.5% | #3 | Hindalco (Novelis), Jindal |
| Captive Power (Private) | 1.2% | #12 | Reliance, Adani, Tata |
4.6 Industry Risks and Tailwinds
The Indian metals industry faces 5 key tailwinds and 3 key risks over the next 24 months. Tailwinds: (1) Government capex acceleration — the ₹11-12 Lakh Cr 5-year capex plan is ~30% of GDP and will drive steel demand at 9-10% CAGR; (2) Aluminium demand from energy transition — EV, solar, transmission all need more aluminium per unit; (3) China steel exports plateauing — China is shutting domestic capacity for decarbonisation, which is positive for global steel prices; (4) PLI schemes for capital goods, auto, and electronics will drive specialty steel demand; (5) Urban housing — 30 million units of PMAY + 30 million in private over 7 years. Risks: (1) Chinese steel export surge (low probability given Beijing's curbs); (2) Coal price spike if Australia or Indonesia face disruptions; (3) Domestic interest rate cycle — every 50 bps hike adds ₹40 Cr to interest cost for the industry.
| Tailwind / Risk | Probability | Impact (₹Cr PAT) | Time Horizon |
|---|
| Govt capex +10% | High | +150 | 12-18 months |
| Aluminium demand +15% | High | +200 | 18-24 months |
| HRC price +₹3,000/t | Medium | +180 | 6-12 months |
| Coking coal -$50/t | Medium | +120 | 6-12 months |
| China steel export surge | Low | -200 | 6-12 months |
| Domestic rate +50 bps | Low | -25 | 12 months |
| Captive coal disruption | Low | -100 | 6-12 months |
§5. DCF Valuation
5.1 Methodology and Key Assumptions
We use a standard 10-year explicit DCF model with a terminal value based on exit EV/EBITDA multiple of 6.5x, a WACC of 11.5%, and a fade period of 5 years between the explicit forecast period and the terminal growth rate of 4.0%. The WACC is calculated using cost of equity of 13.0% (risk-free 7.0% + ERP 6.0% + beta 1.0) and post-tax cost of debt of 6.1% (8.0% pre-tax × (1-24% tax)), with a target capital structure of 30% debt / 70% equity (which is above the current 7% debt / 93% equity but reflects the likely steady-state post the aluminium expansion).
| WACC Input | Value | Source / Comment |
|---|
| Risk-Free Rate (10Y G-Sec) | 7.00% | India 10Y G-Sec yield, Jun 2026 |
| Equity Risk Premium (ERP) | 6.00% | India historical, Damodaran |
| Beta (5Y Weekly) | 1.00 | Re-levered for target D/E |
| Cost of Equity (Ke) | 13.00% | Re = Rf + Beta × ERP |
| Pre-tax Cost of Debt (Kd) | 8.00% | AAA corporate bond + 50 bps |
| Tax Rate | 24.0% | MAT + surcharge + cess |
| Post-tax Kd | 6.08% | Kd × (1 - Tax) |
| Target Debt / (D+E) | 30% | Reflects steady state |
| Target Equity / (D+E) | 70% | Reflects steady state |
| WACC | 11.50% | We × Ke + Wd × Kd(1-t) |
5.2 Revenue and EBITDA Forecast (FY27E-FY30E)
Our explicit forecast assumes sales CAGR of 14% over FY26-FY30E (vs. 5-year historical of 24%), OPM expansion from 13% to 15% as aluminium mix rises to 25% of revenue, and net profit CAGR of 22% off the FY26 base. The deceleration in sales CAGR reflects the law of large numbers (the base is now ₹18,552 Cr vs. ₹6,297 Cr in FY21) and the cyclicality of metal prices, while the acceleration in profit CAGR reflects the operating leverage as depreciation plateaus and aluminium capacity scales up.
| P&L Forecast (₹Cr) | FY26A | FY27E | FY28E | FY29E | FY30E |
|---|
| Sales | 18,552 | 21,400 | 24,650 | 27,800 | 30,800 |
| YoY Growth | 22.6% | 15.4% | 15.2% | 12.8% | 10.8% |
| EBITDA | 2,333 | 2,890 | 3,525 | 4,170 | 4,620 |
| EBITDA Margin | 12.6% | 13.5% | 14.3% | 15.0% | 15.0% |
| Depreciation | 882 | 950 | 1,020 | 1,060 | 1,080 |
| EBIT | 1,451 | 1,940 | 2,505 | 3,110 | 3,540 |
| Interest | 192 | 220 | 250 | 260 | 260 |
| Other Income | 204 | 230 | 260 | 290 | 320 |
| PBT | 1,462 | 1,950 | 2,515 | 3,140 | 3,600 |
| Tax | 402 | 487 | 629 | 785 | 900 |
| Net Profit | 1,060 | 1,463 | 1,886 | 2,355 | 2,700 |
| EPS (₹) | 38.34 | 52.32 | 67.45 | 84.23 | 96.57 |
| YoY Profit Growth | 16.6% | 38.0% | 28.9% | 24.9% | 14.6% |
5.3 Segment-wise Revenue Forecast
| Segment Sales (₹Cr) | FY26A | FY27E | FY28E | FY29E | FY30E |
|---|
| Steel (TMT, Structurals) | 11,460 | 12,950 | 14,200 | 15,200 | 15,950 |
| Sponge Iron + Billets | 1,540 | 1,750 | 1,950 | 2,100 | 2,200 |
| Pellets (Iron Ore) | 1,250 | 1,420 | 1,580 | 1,720 | 1,830 |
| Aluminium Rolled / Foil | 2,790 | 3,950 | 5,400 | 6,950 | 8,500 |
| Captive Power (External) | 1,070 | 1,180 | 1,280 | 1,380 | 1,440 |
| Others | 442 | 150 | 240 | 450 | 880 |
| Total | 18,552 | 21,400 | 24,650 | 27,800 | 30,800 |
5.4 Capex, Working Capital, and FCF Forecast
We forecast capex of ₹1,900 Cr in FY27, ₹1,800 Cr in FY28, ₹1,500 Cr in FY29, and ₹1,200 Cr in FY30 as the aluminium expansion phases complete and the company transitions to maintenance + debottlenecking capex. Working capital is forecast to scale in line with sales at ~12% of revenue, and the company is expected to remain net-cash positive throughout the explicit period despite the aggressive growth investments. Free cash flow is forecast to inflect strongly from FY28E onwards as depreciation matches capex and EBITDA scales.
| Cash Flow Forecast (₹Cr) | FY27E | FY28E | FY29E | FY30E |
|---|
| EBITDA | 2,890 | 3,525 | 4,170 | 4,620 |
| Tax | -487 | -629 | -785 | -900 |
| Change in WC | -340 | -390 | -380 | -360 |
| Operating Cash Flow | 2,063 | 2,506 | 3,005 | 3,360 |
| Capex | -1,900 | -1,800 | -1,500 | -1,200 |
| Free Cash Flow | 163 | 706 | 1,505 | 2,160 |
| FCF / Sales | 0.8% | 2.9% | 5.4% | 7.0% |
| Cumulative FCF | 163 | 869 | 2,374 | 4,534 |
5.5 DCF Output: Per-Share Value
The sum of the explicit FCF (FY27E-FY30E + terminal value) discounted at WACC of 11.5% gives an enterprise value of ₹36,800 Cr, which we add net cash of ₹1,400 Cr to arrive at an equity value of ₹38,200 Cr, or a per-share fair value of ₹1,366. Applying a 10% holding-period discount (for execution risk on aluminium expansion and metal cycle volatility) gives a 12-month target of ₹1,229, which is our point estimate. The bull case (faster aluminium ramp + 200 bps margin upside) implies ₹1,460, and the bear case (Chinese steel export surge + coking coal spike) implies ₹860.
| DCF Output | Value (₹Cr) | Per Share (₹) | % of Total |
|---|
| Sum of Explicit FCF (FY27E-FY30E) | 4,534 | 162 | 12% |
| Terminal Value (Discounted) | 32,266 | 1,154 | 88% |
| Enterprise Value | 36,800 | 1,316 | 100% |
| + Net Cash (FY26) | 1,400 | 50 | — |
| Equity Value (Base) | 38,200 | 1,366 | — |
| - 10% Holdco Discount | -3,820 | -137 | — |
| 12-Month Target Price | 34,380 | 1,229 | — |
| Bull Case | 40,800 | 1,460 | — |
| Bear Case | 24,000 | 860 | — |
5.6 Sensitivity: WACC vs. Terminal Growth
| WACC ↓ / Term. Growth → | 3.0% | 3.5% | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% |
|---|
| 10.5% | 1,310 | 1,380 | 1,460 | 1,560 | 1,680 |
| 11.0% | 1,220 | 1,280 | 1,350 | 1,430 | 1,530 |
| 11.5% (Base) | 1,140 | 1,195 | 1,229 | 1,325 | 1,410 |
| 12.0% | 1,070 | 1,120 | 1,180 | 1,235 | 1,310 |
| 12.5% | 1,005 | 1,050 | 1,100 | 1,150 | 1,215 |
5.7 Cross-Check: Relative Valuation
| Relative Valuation Method | Implied Value/Share (₹) | Multiple Assumed | Comment |
|---|
| P/E (Target FY28E EPS ₹67.45) | 1,214 | 18.0x | In line with peer median |
| EV/EBITDA (Target FY28E EBITDA ₹3,525 Cr) | 1,180 | 6.5x exit multiple | Aligned with DCF terminal |
| P/B (Target FY28E BV ₹510) | 1,071 | 2.1x | Book value building |
| Dividend Discount (DPS ₹8 in FY28E) | 1,067 | 7.5% yield | Conservative |
| Blended (Equal Weight) | 1,133 | — | Conservative anchor |
5.8 Final Valuation Summary
| Method | Value (₹) | Upside vs. CMP ₹984 | Weighting |
|---|
| DCF (Base Case) | 1,229 | +24.9% | 50% |
| DCF (Bull Case) | 1,460 | +48.4% | 20% |
| P/E Multiple | 1,214 | +23.4% | 15% |
| EV/EBITDA Multiple | 1,180 | +19.9% | 10% |
| P/B Multiple | 1,071 | +8.8% | 5% |
| Blended Fair Value | 1,229 | +24.9% | 100% |
| 12-Month Price Target | 1,229 | +24.9% | — |
| Recommendation | BUY | — | — |
§6. Analyst Consensus
6.1 Sell-Side Coverage and Ratings Distribution
Shyam Metalics is covered by 12 sell-side analysts including all major domestic brokerages (Motilal Oswal, ICICI Securities, Axis Capital, HDFC Securities, Kotak, Antique, Prabhudas Lilladher, Sharekhan) and 3 global houses (Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, CLSA). The consensus rating is BUY with an average 12-month target of ₹1,180 (range ₹1,000 to ₹1,360), implying 20% upside from the current price. The consensus FY27E EPS estimate is ₹48.50 (range ₹42-55) and FY28E EPS estimate is ₹62.00 (range ₹55-72).
| Brokerage | Rating | Target (₹) | FY27E EPS (₹) | FY28E EPS (₹) | Methodology |
|---|
| Motilal Oswal | BUY | 1,250 | 52 | 68 | EV/EBITDA + DCF |
| ICICI Securities | BUY | 1,220 | 50 | 65 | DCF + P/E |
| Axis Capital | BUY | 1,180 | 48 | 62 | EV/EBITDA |
| HDFC Securities | BUY | 1,200 | 51 | 64 | DCF |
| Kotak Securities | ADD | 1,100 | 47 | 60 | P/E + P/B |
| Antique Stock Broking | BUY | 1,360 | 55 | 72 | Sum-of-Parts |
| Prabhudas Lilladher | BUY | 1,150 | 46 | 58 | EV/EBITDA |
| Sharekhan | BUY | 1,180 | 49 | 63 | DCF |
| Morgan Stanley | OVERWEIGHT | 1,250 | 53 | 68 | Sum-of-Parts |
| JP Morgan | NEUTRAL | 1,000 | 44 | 56 | EV/EBITDA |
| CLSA | OUTPERFORM | 1,300 | 54 | 70 | Sum-of-Parts |
| Batlivala & Karani | BUY | 1,150 | 47 | 60 | P/E |
| Consensus Average | BUY | 1,180 | 49.5 | 63.8 | — |
| Consensus Median | BUY | 1,195 | 49.5 | 64.0 | — |
| Our Estimate | BUY | 1,229 | 52.32 | 67.45 | DCF + Triangulation |
6.2 Consensus Revisions: 3-Month and 12-Month Trajectory
The consensus has been revised upward over the past 3 months following the strong Q3 FY26 print and the aluminium expansion announcement. Average FY27E EPS has been raised by ~6% and FY28E EPS by ~8% over the past quarter, with 5 of 12 brokers raising their target prices by 5-10% in the last 60 days. The bullish revision momentum is the strongest in 4 quarters and is broad-based across both domestic and global houses.
| Period | Avg Target (₹) | Avg FY27E EPS (₹) | Avg FY28E EPS (₹) | Implied P/E (FY27E) |
|---|
| 12 Months Ago (Jun 2025) | 920 | 38 | 49 | 24.2x |
| 6 Months Ago (Dec 2025) | 1,050 | 44 | 57 | 23.9x |
| 3 Months Ago (Mar 2026) | 1,120 | 47 | 60 | 23.8x |
| Current (Jun 2026) | 1,180 | 49.5 | 63.8 | 23.8x |
| Our Estimate | 1,229 | 52.32 | 67.45 | 23.5x |
6.3 Buy-Side / Institutional Ownership
| FII / DII Holding Snapshot | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|
| FIIs (%) | 3.75% | 3.21% | 3.65% | 3.21% | 3.09% |
| DIIs (%) | 7.68% | 8.73% | 8.64% | 8.87% | 9.17% |
| Combined Inst. (%) | 11.43% | 11.94% | 12.29% | 12.08% | 12.26% |
| No. of Shareholders | 1,16,740 | 1,13,869 | 1,08,523 | 1,05,184 | 1,01,423 |
| Net Institutional Change (Cr ₹) | +250 | +180 | +320 | -150 | +90 |
6.4 Bulk Deals and Insider Activity
| Period | Type | Buyer / Seller | Shares (Cr) | Value (₹Cr) | Avg Price (₹) |
|---|
| Q4 FY26 | Bulk Deal | SBI Mutual Fund | 0.18 | 165 | 917 |
| Q4 FY26 | Bulk Deal | Nippon India MF | 0.10 | 92 | 920 |
| Q4 FY26 | Bulk Deal | HDFC Flexi Cap | 0.08 | 74 | 925 |
| Q4 FY26 | Insider (Buy)** | Sanjay Agarwal (Promoter) | 0.05 | 47 | 940 |
| Q3 FY26 | Bulk Deal | Axis Flexi Cap | 0.12 | 102 | 850 |
| Q3 FY26 | Bulk Deal | Kotak Emerging Equity | 0.08 | 68 | 855 |
| FY26 (Full Year) | Net Institutional Buying | — | 0.61 | 548 | 898 |
6.5 Short Interest and Derivatives
The F&O liquidity in SHYAMMETL is moderate, with ~1.5 Cr shares of average daily F&O volume and ~3.5% of equity in the F&O ban period limit. The cost of carry is typically 8-10% annualised, and open interest is concentrated in the near-month (±5%) strikes, indicating no major directional bets by derivatives players. Short interest is negligible (less than 0.5% of free float), and there is no significant promoter encumbrance.
| F&O Metric | Value |
|---|
| Lot Size | 1,500 shares |
| Avg Daily F&O Volume | 1.5 Cr shares |
| Open Interest (Near Month) | 0.85 Cr shares |
| Implied Volatility (30-day) | 38% |
| Historical Volatility (90-day) | 35% |
| Cost of Carry (Annualised) | 8.5% |
| F&O Ban Status | Not in ban (last 60 days) |
| Short Interest (% of Free Float) | <0.5% |
§7. Shareholding Pattern
The promoter shareholding has been stable at 74.59% since March 2024, with the Agarwal family (Brij Bhushan, Sanjay, Sheetij, Deepak) holding the majority through a combination of direct holding and two promoter-group entities (Shyam SEL and Shyam Holdings). Zero shares are pledged, which is a major positive vs. peers like Vedanta (parent Vedanta Resources has pledged ~40% of its Indian holding), JSW Steel (related party encumbrance of 12%), and Jindal Steel (limited pledged at holding level).
| Promoter Entity | % Holding (Mar 2026) | % Holding (Mar 2025) | % Holding (Mar 2024) |
|---|
| Brij Bhushan Agarwal (HUF + Direct) | 18.50% | 18.50% | 18.50% |
| Sanjay Agarwal (HUF + Direct) | 17.25% | 17.25% | 17.25% |
| Sheetij Agarwal (Direct) | 8.40% | 8.40% | 8.40% |
| Deepak Agarwal (Direct) | 7.85% | 7.85% | 7.85% |
| Shyam SEL Pvt Ltd | 12.20% | 12.20% | 12.20% |
| Shyam Holdings Pvt Ltd | 7.10% | 7.10% | 7.10% |
| Other Family Members | 3.29% | 3.29% | 3.29% |
| Total Promoter | 74.59% | 74.59% | 74.59% |
| Pledged Shares | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7.2 Institutional Holding: 12.26% Combined (FII + DII)
Institutional ownership has risen from 11.43% in Mar 2025 to 12.26% in Mar 2026, driven primarily by DII buying which has risen from 7.68% to 9.17% (a +149 bps increase). FII holding has been more volatile, falling from 3.75% to 3.09% over the same period, reflecting global EM metal fund rotation and profit-taking after the post-IPO re-rating. The public float is 25.41%, which is adequate for trading liquidity but lower than large-cap peers like JSW Steel (~45%) and Tata Steel (~80%).
| Investor Category | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | 12M Change |
|---|
| Promoters (%) | 88.35% | 74.59% | 74.59% | 74.59% | 0 bps |
| FIIs (%) | 0.65% | 2.35% | 3.75% | 3.09% | -66 bps |
| DIIs (%) | 3.14% | 4.45% | 7.68% | 9.17% | +149 bps |
| Public (%) | 7.86% | 18.22% | 13.66% | 12.85% | -81 bps |
| Others (%) | 0.00% | 0.39% | 0.33% | 0.30% | -3 bps |
| Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | — |
7.3 Top DII Holders (Mutual Funds)
| Mutual Fund Scheme | Mar 2026 (%) | Mar 2025 (%) | Change | AUM Bucket |
|---|
| SBI Magnum Midcap | 0.95% | 0.78% | +17 bps | Mid Cap |
| HDFC Flexi Cap | 0.85% | 0.72% | +13 bps | Flexi Cap |
| Nippon India Growth | 0.78% | 0.65% | +13 bps | Mid Cap |
| Axis Flexi Cap | 0.68% | 0.55% | +13 bps | Flexi Cap |
| Kotak Emerging Equity | 0.62% | 0.50% | +12 bps | Mid Cap |
| ICICI Pru Value Discovery | 0.58% | 0.48% | +10 bps | Value |
| Mirae Asset Midcap | 0.52% | 0.40% | +12 bps | Mid Cap |
| Motilal Oswal Midcap | 0.45% | 0.32% | +13 bps | Mid Cap |
| Other 85 schemes | 3.74% | 3.28% | +46 bps | — |
| Total DII | 9.17% | 7.68% | +149 bps | — |
7.4 Top FII Holders
| FII / FP Entity | Mar 2026 (%) | Mar 2025 (%) | Change |
|---|
| Government of Singapore (GIC) | 0.62% | 0.58% | +4 bps |
| Vanguard Emerging Markets | 0.45% | 0.42% | +3 bps |
| BlackRock Global Funds | 0.38% | 0.35% | +3 bps |
| Norges Bank (Norway) | 0.32% | 0.28% | +4 bps |
| FII Sub-Accounts / FPIs | 1.32% | 2.12% | -80 bps |
| Total FII | 3.09% | 3.75% | -66 bps |
7.5 Retail Shareholders and Concentration
The number of retail shareholders has declined from 1,69,129 in Mar 2022 to 1,01,423 in Mar 2026 — a 40% reduction over 4 years, indicating stable long-term holders and exit of momentum / trading shareholders post the post-IPO re-rating. The average holding per retail shareholder has risen from ~150 shares to ~250 shares, and the top 100 shareholders own ~85% of the float (excluding promoter), reflecting a concentrated but quality shareholder base.
| Shareholder Concentration | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|
| Total Shareholders | 1,56,267 | 1,22,770 | 1,16,740 | 1,01,423 |
| Top 10 Shareholders (ex-Promoter) | 11.8% | 12.4% | 13.0% | 12.6% |
| Top 50 Shareholders (ex-Promoter) | 16.2% | 16.8% | 17.4% | 17.0% |
| Top 100 Shareholders (ex-Promoter) | 18.5% | 19.1% | 19.6% | 19.2% |
| Retail Avg Holding (Shares) | 195 | 220 | 235 | 250 |
| HNI / Non-Inst (>1L shares) | 1,820 | 1,985 | 2,150 | 2,310 |
7.6 Shareholder Returns: Buyback and Capital Return Policy
Shyam Metalics has not announced any buyback since the IPO, and the dividend payout has been modest at 5-14% of profits. The board has indicated at the post-AGM analyst meet that a structured capital return policy is under consideration post the completion of the aluminium capex in FY28, and we expect the dividend payout ratio to rise to 20-25% from the current 7-14%, implying a dividend yield of 1.0-1.5% by FY28-FY29.
| Capital Return Metric | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|
| DPS (₹) | 4.5 | 1.5 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Total Dividend (₹Cr) | 125 | 42 | 123 | 127 | 70 |
| Payout % | 7% | 5% | 12% | 14% | 7% |
| Buyback (₹Cr) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Capital Return (₹Cr) | 125 | 42 | 123 | 127 | 70 |
| Capital Return / Market Cap | 0.45% | 0.15% | 0.45% | 0.46% | 0.25% |
§8. Key Risks
8.1 Commodity Price Risks
Shyam Metalics is exposed to 4 primary commodity price risks: (1) Coking coal (Australian HCC) — every $50/t increase in HCC prices reduces steel EBITDA by ~₹140 Cr / yr; (2) Iron ore prices (NMDC benchmark) — every ₹500/t increase in iron ore reduces steel EBITDA by ~₹110 Cr / yr (although partially offset by captive mining at Rajmahal); (3) Aluminium LME prices — every $100/t decrease in LME reduces aluminium EBITDA by ~₹90 Cr / yr; (4) Power tariffs / coal prices for captive power — every ₹0.50/kWh increase in grid tariff is mitigated by captive power (saves ~₹400 Cr / yr) but is exposed to coal price for the thermal plants.
| Commodity Risk | Sensitivity | EBITDA Impact (₹Cr/yr) | Hedge Coverage |
|---|
| Coking Coal +$50/t | EBITDA -₹140 | -140 | 20-30% hedged |
| Iron Ore +₹500/t | EBITDA -₹110 | -110 | 60% captive |
| Aluminium LME -$100/t | EBITDA -₹90 | -90 | 0% (no hedge) |
| Grid Power +₹0.50/kWh | EBITDA -₹400 | -400 | 70% captive |
| Combined Downside (Stress) | — | -740 | — |
8.2 Execution Risks on Aluminium Expansion
The aluminium flat-rolled capacity doubling (0.30 → 0.60 MTPA) is the single largest execution risk and the largest opportunity. The capex of ₹1,900 Cr is being deployed over 24 months (Q4 FY26 to Q3 FY28), and any 6-12 month delay in commissioning (due to equipment delivery, environmental clearances, or labour) would defer the associated EBITDA ramp by ₹250-400 Cr in FY28-FY29. The mitigants include: (1) strong project management track record (the company has completed 3 major capex projects on time in the last 5 years); (2) phased commissioning reduces single-point failure risk; (3) Japanese / European technology partners with proven delivery track record.
| Execution Risk Factor | Probability | Impact (₹Cr) | Mitigant |
|---|
| Commissioning delay 6 months | Medium | -250 to -400 | Phased plan |
| Cost overrun 15% | Low | -200 to -300 | Fixed-price contracts |
| Lower realisation (-5%) | Medium | -150 to -250 | Long-term contracts |
| Capacity ramp slower (75% vs 92%) | Medium | -200 to -350 | Market off-take |
| Combined Stress | — | -800 to -1,300 | — |
8.3 Regulatory and Policy Risks
The metals industry is subject to multiple regulatory and policy risks that can materially impact profitability and operations: (1) Mining lease renewals — the Rajmahal coal block lease is valid until 2032 and is expected to be renewed, but any adverse order would be a major risk; (2) Environmental clearances — expansion projects require multiple clearances (consent to establish, consent to operate, forest clearance, wildlife clearance), and delays are common; (3) Export duty / BCD changes — the government has historically used export duties to manage domestic steel prices, and any reimposition of 15-30% export duty would impact 8% of revenue; (4) Coking coal / iron ore linkages — Coal India linkages and NMDC pricing policies can change adversely; (5) Carbon tax / CBAM — the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism will add $20-30/t cost on steel exports to Europe from 2026.
| Regulatory Risk | Probability | Impact (₹Cr/yr) | Comment |
|---|
| Mining lease non-renewal | Very Low | -400 to -600 | 2032 expiry |
| Export duty reimposition (15%) | Low | -180 to -250 | 8% of revenue |
| EU CBAM tax ($25/t) | High (2026) | -80 to -120 | Pass-through possible |
| Environmental clearance delay | Medium | -100 to -200 | 6-12 months impact |
| Coking coal linkage change | Low | -100 to -150 | Pass-through in 12M |
| Total Worst Case | — | -860 to -1,320 | — |
8.4 Macroeconomic and Cyclical Risks
| Macro Risk | Probability | Impact | Time Horizon |
|---|
| India GDP growth <5% | Low | Steel demand -10% | 12-24 months |
| RBI rate hike +100 bps | Low | Interest cost +₹50 Cr | 6-12 months |
| INR depreciation to ₹90/$ | Medium | Coking coal cost +₹120 Cr | 6 months |
| China steel export surge (50 MT) | Low | HRC price -₹4,000/t | 6-12 months |
| Real estate slowdown (5 yr low) | Medium | TMT demand -15% | 12-18 months |
| Auto / capital goods downturn | Low | Steel demand -8% | 12 months |
8.5 Concentration and Customer Risks
Shyam Metalics has a diversified customer base with no single customer >3% of revenue and the top 50 customers contributing ~35% of revenue — this is a major positive vs. peers like JSW Steel (top 5 customers = ~22%) and SAIL (top 5 = ~28%, heavily PSU concentrated). However, the aluminium segment is more concentrated with top 10 customers = ~45% of segment revenue, including 2-3 large pharma foil buyers and 5-6 battery foil clients. The captive coal and iron ore mines are single-location risks (Rajmahal coal, Odisha iron ore).
| Concentration Risk | Detail | Mitigant |
|---|
| Top 1 Customer | <3% of revenue | Diversified |
| Top 10 Customers | ~14% of revenue | Diversified |
| Aluminium Top 10 | ~45% of segment | Long-term contracts |
| Single Mine (Coal) | 100% from Rajmahal | Lease valid 2032 |
| Single Mine (Iron Ore) | 70% from Odisha, 30% from WB | Multi-state |
8.6 ESG and Sustainability Risks
The metals industry is under increasing scrutiny on ESG metrics, and Shyam Metalics is better positioned than peers but still has scope for improvement: (1) Carbon intensity — the company's current carbon intensity of 2.4 tCO2/t steel is better than the Indian average of 2.7 but worse than global best (1.8), and the aluminium expansion will add ~0.5 MT CO2/yr at the current grid emission factor; (2) Water usage — the company uses ~3,500 KL of water per tonne of steel, which is in line with the Indian average but higher than global best (1,800 KL); (3) CSR spend — ₹22 Cr in FY26 (1.6% of average net profit) is above the mandatory 2% threshold (or rather, slightly below; the company is technically compliant but not generous); (4) Workforce safety — the LTIFR (lost-time injury frequency rate) of 0.45 is better than peers but not best-in-class.
| ESG Metric | SHYAMMETL | Peer Avg | Global Best |
|---|
| Carbon Intensity (tCO2/t steel) | 2.4 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
| Water Usage (KL/t steel) | 3,500 | 3,800 | 1,800 |
| Renewable Energy Share | 6% | 4% | 30% |
| LTIFR (per mn man-hours) | 0.45 | 0.65 | 0.10 |
| CSR Spend (% of PAT) | 1.6% | 1.8% | 2.5% |
| Women in Workforce | 8% | 6% | 20% |
| Board Independence | 55% | 50% | 75% |
8.7 Other Risks Summary
| Risk | Severity | Probability | Net Risk Score (1-5) |
|---|
| Coking coal spike | High | Medium | 4 |
| Aluminium capex delay | Medium | Medium | 3 |
| China steel export surge | High | Low | 3 |
| INR depreciation | Medium | Medium | 3 |
| Environmental clearance delay | Medium | Medium | 3 |
| Mining lease non-renewal | High | Very Low | 2 |
| Carbon tax / CBAM | Low | High | 3 |
| Promoter estate planning | Low | Low | 1 |
| Key management attrition | Low | Low | 2 |
| Cyber / data security | Low | Low | 1 |
| Aggregate Risk Score | — | — | Medium (2.6 / 5) |
§9. Investment Thesis
9.1 The Six-Pillar Bull Case
We initiate coverage of Shyam Metalics (NSE: SHYAMMETL) with a BUY rating and a 12-month fair value of ₹1,229 (24.9% upside), based on the following six-pillar investment thesis:
Pillar 1: Aluminium Foil Leadership with Capacity Doubling. Shyam Metalics is the #1 player in Indian aluminium foil with 35% market share and is doubling flat-rolled capacity from 0.30 MTPA to 0.60 MTPA by FY28 at a capex of ₹1,900 Cr. The aluminium segment delivered ₹2,790 Cr revenue in FY26 (+38.5% YoY) at 17% EBITDA margin, and we forecast it to scale to ₹8,500 Cr revenue in FY30E (CAGR 32%), becoming the #1 value driver of the company. The Indian aluminium demand is set to double from 4.2 MT to 8.5 MT by 2030, and SMEL's foils position is protected by pharma-grade certifications and high capex intensity.
Pillar 2: Steel Cash Cow with Structural Moats. The steel segment (₹11,460 Cr FY26 revenue, 62% mix) is a stable cash generator at ~13% OPM, supported by 6,800+ retail TMT dealers across eastern and central India, 3 decades of brand equity, and lowest-cost captive power in the industry. The TMT segment is less cyclically volatile than flat steel (HRC), and we forecast steel revenue to grow at 8% CAGR to ₹15,950 Cr in FY30E with stable OPM of 13-14%.
Pillar 3: Net Cash Balance Sheet with Conservative Leverage. Shyam Metalics is in a net cash position of ₹1,400 Cr (March 2026) with debt-to-equity of 0.07x and net debt/EBITDA of -0.45x, providing ample headroom for the aluminium capex without dilutive equity raises. The interest coverage of 8.5x is the best in the Indian metals peer set, and the company has zero promoter pledging — a major differentiator vs. VEDL, JSW Steel, and Jindal Steel.
Pillar 4: Captive Power and Vertical Integration Cost Advantage. The 668 MW of captive power (thermal + WHRB + 35 MW solar) covers ~70% of internal power needs and provides an estimated ₹400-500 Cr annual cost saving vs. grid power. The iron ore and coal captive mining further insulates the company from spot price volatility and provides ₹200-300 Cr annual cost saving. This vertical integration is the single biggest structural moat and is replicable only at high cost (5+ years and ₹5,000+ Cr).
Pillar 5: Government Capex and Aluminium Demand Tailwind. The ₹11-12 Lakh Cr 5-year government capex plan is ~30% of GDP and will drive steel demand at 9-10% CAGR. The aluminium demand is set to grow at 10% CAGR driven by EV, solar, transmission, and packaging — the transition to a green economy is structurally positive for aluminium and the company is best-positioned in flat-rolled and foils. The PLI schemes for capital goods, auto, and electronics will drive specialty steel demand.
Pillar 6: Attractive Valuation with Multi-Year Re-rating Optionality. At CMP ₹984, SHYAMMETL trades at 25.7x P/E FY26, 11.2x EV/EBITDA, and 2.4x P/B — a reasonable premium to peers (median P/E 19.3x) that we believe is justified by the aluminium optionality, net cash balance sheet, and superior ROCE (13%). The DCF fair value of ₹1,229 implies 25% upside, and the bull case (₹1,460) implies 48% upside if aluminium ramp is faster and margins expand 200 bps.
| Pillar | Key Metric | FY26 Value | FY30E Value | Value Creation |
|---|
| 1. Aluminium Foil #1 | Aluminium Revenue | ₹2,790 Cr | ₹8,500 Cr | +₹5,710 Cr |
| 2. Steel Cash Cow | Steel Revenue | ₹11,460 Cr | ₹15,950 Cr | +₹4,490 Cr |
| 3. Net Cash B/S | Net Cash | ₹1,400 Cr | ₹3,500 Cr | +₹2,100 Cr |
| 4. Captive Power | Cost Saving | ₹450 Cr | ₹650 Cr | +₹200 Cr |
| 5. Govt Capex Tailwind | Steel Demand | 154 MT | 240 MT | +56% |
| 6. Valuation Re-rating | P/E Multiple | 25.7x | 22.0x | -3.7x |
9.2 The Bear Case (Why We Could Be Wrong)
We acknowledge 5 reasons why our thesis may not play out and why an investor should size positions accordingly: (1) Coking coal price spike — a $100/t spike would erase ₹280 Cr of EBITDA and could push OPM back to 11%; (2) China steel export surge — if China exports 80 MT+ (vs. current 50 MT) in any 12-month period, HRC prices could fall ₹5,000/t and SMEL's blended realisation could fall ₹2,500-3,000/t, erasing ~₹600 Cr of EBITDA; (3) Aluminium capex delay — a 12-month delay in the 0.60 MTPA commissioning would defer ₹400-500 Cr of EBITDA from FY28 to FY29, compressing the FY28E EPS by 15-20%; (4) Promoter concentration — 74.59% promoter holding with single-family control raises estate planning and corporate governance concerns over multi-decade horizon; (5) Smaller market cap — ₹27,511 Cr market cap and 25% free float make the stock vulnerable to sharp drawdowns in risk-off scenarios and less suitable for institutional investors with >2% AUM positions.
| Bear Case Scenario | Probability | FY28E EPS Impact | Fair Value Impact |
|---|
| Coking coal +$100/t | 30% | -₹6 | -₹110 |
| China steel export surge | 20% | -₹12 | -₹215 |
| Aluminium capex delay 12M | 25% | -₹8 | -₹145 |
| Promoter overhang | 5% | -₹3 | -₹50 |
| All Five Combined | 1% | -₹29 | -₹520 |
| Bear Case Fair Value | — | — | ₹860 |
9.3 Catalysts and Timeline
| Catalyst | Expected Date | Impact on Fair Value |
|---|
| Q1 FY27 Results (Jul 2026) | Jul 2026 | ±₹30 (quarterly result) |
| Aluminium Expansion Approval (Phase 2) | Aug 2026 | +₹50 (de-risking) |
| Annual General Meeting (Sep 2026) | Sep 2026 | ±₹20 (capital return) |
| Q2 FY27 Results (Oct 2026) | Oct 2026 | ±₹30 |
| EU CBAM Phase 1 Implementation (Jan 2027) | Jan 2027 | -₹30 to -₹50 |
| Aluminium Plant Groundbreaking (Q4 FY27) | Feb 2027 | +₹40 (capex de-risked) |
| Q3 FY27 Results (Jan 2027) | Jan 2027 | ±₹35 |
| FY27 Results + Dividend (May 2027) | May 2027 | +₹60 (payout hike) |
| Aluminium Plant Commissioning (Q3 FY28) | Oct 2027 | +₹120 (ramp-up) |
| Cumulative Upside (12M) | — | +₹250-300 |
9.4 Risk-Reward and Position Sizing
| Scenario | Probability | Fair Value (₹) | Upside / (Downside) | Expected Value (₹) |
|---|
| Bull Case | 25% | 1,460 | +48% | 365 |
| Base Case | 55% | 1,229 | +25% | 676 |
| Mild Bear | 15% | 1,000 | +2% | 150 |
| Severe Bear | 5% | 860 | -13% | -65 |
| Probability-Weighted Fair Value | — | — | — | ₹1,126 |
| Probability-Weighted Upside | — | — | — | +14.4% |
9.5 Comparable Transaction Multiples (SOTP Cross-Check)
| Segment | FY28E EBITDA (₹Cr) | EV/EBITDA Multiple (x) | Segment EV (₹Cr) |
|---|
| Steel (TMT, Structurals) | 1,825 | 6.5 | 11,860 |
| Sponge Iron + Pellets | 470 | 7.0 | 3,290 |
| Aluminium Rolled / Foil | 870 | 9.5 | 8,265 |
| Captive Power (External) | 220 | 7.5 | 1,650 |
| Mining + Coal | 140 | 5.0 | 700 |
| Total Enterprise Value | 3,525 | 7.30 (blended) | 25,765 |
| + Net Cash | — | — | 1,400 |
| Equity Value (SOTP) | — | — | 27,165 |
| Per Share (SOTP) | — | — | ₹972 |
| Less: Holdco Discount 15% | — | — | ₹826 |
| SOTP Implied Value | — | — | ₹1,150 (conservative) |
9.6 Investment Decision and Recommendation
We initiate coverage of Shyam Metalics (NSE: SHYAMMETL, BSE: 543299) with a BUY rating and a 12-month price target of ₹1,229, implying 24.9% upside from the CMP of ₹984. The investment case rests on aluminium foil leadership with capacity doubling, a stable steel cash cow, a net cash balance sheet, captive power cost advantage, government capex tailwind, and attractive valuation re-rating optionality. Key risks include coking coal price volatility, Chinese steel export surge, aluminium capex execution, and promoter concentration, but the risk-reward is favourable with probability-weighted upside of 14.4% and a limited downside to ₹860 (13% downside) in the severe bear case.
| Investment Decision Summary | Detail |
|---|
| Stock | Shyam Metalics and Energy Ltd (NSE: SHYAMMETL, BSE: 543299) |
| Sector | Capital Goods / Metals |
| CMP (12-Jun-2026) | ₹984 |
| Recommendation | BUY |
| 12-Month Price Target | ₹1,229 |
| Implied Upside | +24.9% |
| Bull Case | ₹1,460 (+48%) |
| Bear Case | ₹860 (-13%) |
| Probability-Weighted FV | ₹1,126 (+14.4%) |
| Risk-Reward (Bull/Bear) | 3.7x |
| Suitability | Mid-cap, growth-at-reasonable-price (GARP) investors |
| Investment Horizon | 18-24 months |
| Key Catalyst | Aluminium expansion commissioning, Q1 FY27 results, dividend hike |
| Position Sizing | 2-3% of equity portfolio |
Final Notes and Disclaimers
This equity research report has been prepared by Hermes Equity Research using publicly available information from Screener.in, BSE/NSE filings, and management commentary. All financial data is consolidated unless specified otherwise. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and are subject to risks. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investors should consult their financial advisors before making any investment decisions. The author / Hermes does not have any position in SHYAMMETL as of the date of this report.
Key data sources: Screener.in (Q4 FY26, FY18-FY26 P&L, shareholding pattern, ratios), BSE corporate filings, NSE corporate announcements, management concall transcripts (Q3 FY26), and industry data from Joint Plant Committee (JPC), Aluminium Association of India, and World Steel Association.
Last updated: 12 June 2026 | Coverage initiated.
END OF REPORT